<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A CPU History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:49:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: steven</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-38376</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">2062623521#comment-38376</guid>
		<description>Really your services are good we like it please keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really your services are good we like it please keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: History of processor!!! - Raymond.CC Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-36794</link>
		<dc:creator>History of processor!!! - Raymond.CC Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">2062623521#comment-36794</guid>
		<description>[...] for my Microprocessors exam, i just came up with an article. Thought of sharing it with you guys.  History of Processor  Its worth to be known, (though they had left 8085 which came years before 8086).   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for my Microprocessors exam, i just came up with an article. Thought of sharing it with you guys.  History of Processor  Its worth to be known, (though they had left 8085 which came years before 8086).   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The World&#8217;s Most Powerful Telescopes and Best Observatories &#124; Travel in the Sky</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-36272</link>
		<dc:creator>The World&#8217;s Most Powerful Telescopes and Best Observatories &#124; Travel in the Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">2062623521#comment-36272</guid>
		<description>[...] 20 years old, Hubble runs on some old-school computing technology, including a relatively ancient Intel 486 processor. Hubble is one of NASA&#8217;s four &#8220;great observatories&#8221;—the others include the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 20 years old, Hubble runs on some old-school computing technology, including a relatively ancient Intel 486 processor. Hubble is one of NASA&#8217;s four &#8220;great observatories&#8221;—the others include the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manzoor</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-33921</link>
		<dc:creator>manzoor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">2062623521#comment-33921</guid>
		<description>Very knowledgeful. Please update with latest changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very knowledgeful. Please update with latest changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Wyn Griffith</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-32824</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Wyn Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">2062623521#comment-32824</guid>
		<description>That Tandy 186 was the Tandy 2000 and its graphics were not 100% compatible with Windows much to the distress of users (I was one when I bought my first &quot;almost-PC&quot; in the UK back in the &#039;90&#039;s). This caused a lot of ill feeling between users and Tandy. The Users Group launched a monthly called &quot;Orphans&quot; and hated Ed Juge (who died recently) the then CEO of Tandy for not providing any support.

I was amused a few years ago when Googling on Tandy 2000 to pull up a full page advert for it from one of the well known magazines at that time in which Bill Gates lauded it saying how much his programmers depended on it for its performance! Might explain some of Windows problems if they were using a non-conforming PC !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Tandy 186 was the Tandy 2000 and its graphics were not 100% compatible with Windows much to the distress of users (I was one when I bought my first &#8220;almost-PC&#8221; in the UK back in the &#8217;90&#8217;s). This caused a lot of ill feeling between users and Tandy. The Users Group launched a monthly called &#8220;Orphans&#8221; and hated Ed Juge (who died recently) the then CEO of Tandy for not providing any support.</p>
<p>I was amused a few years ago when Googling on Tandy 2000 to pull up a full page advert for it from one of the well known magazines at that time in which Bill Gates lauded it saying how much his programmers depended on it for its performance! Might explain some of Windows problems if they were using a non-conforming PC !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archetype</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-31008</link>
		<dc:creator>archetype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">2062623521#comment-31008</guid>
		<description>There was also a Tandy / Radio Shack PC that used an 80186. Just one model that didn&#039;t last for more than a year.  Their usual black and silver case. I can&#039;t swear that it was 100% compatible with the usual instruction sets that software depended on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was also a Tandy / Radio Shack PC that used an 80186. Just one model that didn&#8217;t last for more than a year.  Their usual black and silver case. I can&#8217;t swear that it was 100% compatible with the usual instruction sets that software depended on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Jelusic</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-19401</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Jelusic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">2062623521#comment-19401</guid>
		<description>I have at home an pc desktop powered by an 8088 at 3.5 mhz with turbo mode, black-yellow monitor, 20mb disk and only 5.25&#039;&#039; floppy. As for dos I think it&#039;s ibm-dos. Not really certain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have at home an pc desktop powered by an 8088 at 3.5 mhz with turbo mode, black-yellow monitor, 20mb disk and only 5.25&#8221; floppy. As for dos I think it&#8217;s ibm-dos. Not really certain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick Russom</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-10017</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Russom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">2062623521#comment-10017</guid>
		<description>Acorn&#039;s Master 512 PC had a 10MHz 80186 CPU which ran MS-DOS and GEM. I would say this qualifies it as a &quot;PC&quot; running a 80186 running MS-DOS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acorn&#8217;s Master 512 PC had a 10MHz 80186 CPU which ran MS-DOS and GEM. I would say this qualifies it as a &#8220;PC&#8221; running a 80186 running MS-DOS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Buchanan</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-9761</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Buchanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">2062623521#comment-9761</guid>
		<description>Correction to information provided on the Intel 80186 (1980).
This Processor was used in one desk top system but the system did not sell well. The company was Tandy and the model was Tandy 2000. There is a very good page at: http://www.old-computers.com/museum/computer.asp?c=1219 covering the processor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction to information provided on the Intel 80186 (1980).<br />
This Processor was used in one desk top system but the system did not sell well. The company was Tandy and the model was Tandy 2000. There is a very good page at: <a href="http://www.old-computers.com/museum/computer.asp?c=1219" rel="nofollow">http://www.old-computers.com/museum/computer.asp?c=1219</a> covering the processor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4723</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 11:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">2062623521#comment-4723</guid>
		<description>This is great, im supposed to be at work, but im reading this, just spent quite a while reading it. Its very interesting, Thank You</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great, im supposed to be at work, but im reading this, just spent quite a while reading it. Its very interesting, Thank You</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
