<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: A CPU History</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/</link> <description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Patricia</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-40903</link> <dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:14:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://2062623521#comment-40903</guid> <description>u probably have the one that was made in 1990 then that was the 1 that did make it in2 the personal computer as is later stated in there</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u probably have the one that was made in 1990 then that was the 1 that did make it in2 the personal computer as is later stated in there</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: slimm</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-40713</link> <dc:creator>slimm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 21:16:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://2062623521#comment-40713</guid> <description>thanks for the notess</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the notess</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: prajjwol</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-40239</link> <dc:creator>prajjwol</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:15:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://2062623521#comment-40239</guid> <description>what is the significances of the number like 8086 in the processor</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the significances of the number like 8086 in the processor</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mary Alice Thauvette</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-40007</link> <dc:creator>Mary Alice Thauvette</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:55:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://2062623521#comment-40007</guid> <description>This article was posted 23-Mar-01.  That was nine years ago.  It is time to update the article.  Or, at least change the title of the last section from :1999 – Present&quot; to &quot;1999 - March 2001&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article was posted 23-Mar-01.  That was nine years ago.  It is time to update the article.  Or, at least change the title of the last section from :1999 – Present&#8221; to &#8220;1999 &#8211; March 2001&#8243;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chelle-marie</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-39907</link> <dc:creator>chelle-marie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:59:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://2062623521#comment-39907</guid> <description>that is great i loved the little joke:&quot;The following chips are considered the dinosaurs of the computer world. PC’s based on these processors are the kind that usually sit around in the garage or warehouse collecting dust. They are not of much use anymore, but us geeks don’t like throwing them out because they still work. You know who you are.&quot;sounds just like my tech teacher becouse he is always complaining about how things have changed and shows us pictures from back when computers still used tapes and how he used to get paid to change the tapes every two hours for a hospitle</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is great i loved the little joke:</p><p>&#8220;The following chips are considered the dinosaurs of the computer world. PC’s based on these processors are the kind that usually sit around in the garage or warehouse collecting dust. They are not of much use anymore, but us geeks don’t like throwing them out because they still work. You know who you are.&#8221;</p><p>sounds just like my tech teacher becouse he is always complaining about how things have changed and shows us pictures from back when computers still used tapes and how he used to get paid to change the tapes every two hours for a hospitle</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: steven</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-38376</link> <dc:creator>steven</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:21:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://2062623521#comment-38376</guid> <description>Really your services are good we like it please keep it up.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really your services are good we like it please keep it up.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: History of processor!!! - Raymond.CC Forum</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-36794</link> <dc:creator>History of processor!!! - Raymond.CC Forum</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:03:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://2062623521#comment-36794</guid> <description>[...] for my Microprocessors exam, i just came up with an article. Thought of sharing it with you guys.  History of Processor  Its worth to be known, (though they had left 8085 which came years before 8086).   [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for my Microprocessors exam, i just came up with an article. Thought of sharing it with you guys.  History of Processor  Its worth to be known, (though they had left 8085 which came years before 8086).   [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The World&#8217;s Most Powerful Telescopes and Best Observatories &#124; Travel in the Sky</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-36272</link> <dc:creator>The World&#8217;s Most Powerful Telescopes and Best Observatories &#124; Travel in the Sky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:07:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://2062623521#comment-36272</guid> <description>[...] 20 years old, Hubble runs on some old-school computing technology, including a relatively ancient Intel 486 processor. Hubble is one of NASA&#8217;s four &#8220;great observatories&#8221;—the others include the [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 20 years old, Hubble runs on some old-school computing technology, including a relatively ancient Intel 486 processor. Hubble is one of NASA&#8217;s four &#8220;great observatories&#8221;—the others include the [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: manzoor</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-33921</link> <dc:creator>manzoor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:45:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://2062623521#comment-33921</guid> <description>Very knowledgeful. Please update with latest changes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very knowledgeful. Please update with latest changes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hugh Wyn Griffith</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-cpu-history/comment-page-1/#comment-32824</link> <dc:creator>Hugh Wyn Griffith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:59:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://2062623521#comment-32824</guid> <description>That Tandy 186 was the Tandy 2000 and its graphics were not 100% compatible with Windows much to the distress of users (I was one when I bought my first &quot;almost-PC&quot; in the UK back in the &#039;90&#039;s). This caused a lot of ill feeling between users and Tandy. The Users Group launched a monthly called &quot;Orphans&quot; and hated Ed Juge (who died recently) the then CEO of Tandy for not providing any support.I was amused a few years ago when Googling on Tandy 2000 to pull up a full page advert for it from one of the well known magazines at that time in which Bill Gates lauded it saying how much his programmers depended on it for its performance! Might explain some of Windows problems if they were using a non-conforming PC !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Tandy 186 was the Tandy 2000 and its graphics were not 100% compatible with Windows much to the distress of users (I was one when I bought my first &#8220;almost-PC&#8221; in the UK back in the &#8217;90&#8242;s). This caused a lot of ill feeling between users and Tandy. The Users Group launched a monthly called &#8220;Orphans&#8221; and hated Ed Juge (who died recently) the then CEO of Tandy for not providing any support.</p><p>I was amused a few years ago when Googling on Tandy 2000 to pull up a full page advert for it from one of the well known magazines at that time in which Bill Gates lauded it saying how much his programmers depended on it for its performance! Might explain some of Windows problems if they were using a non-conforming PC !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 38/53 queries in 0.021 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.pcmech.com @ 2012-02-11 20:54:54 -->
