<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Note Before Modifying Your Windows Registry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-note-before-modifying-your-windows-registry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-note-before-modifying-your-windows-registry/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sharron Field</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-note-before-modifying-your-windows-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-19648</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharron Field</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=8950#comment-19648</guid>
		<description>For my part I have used Uniblue Registry Booster without any problems for a while several years ago. Lately I&#039;ve been using PC Pitstop Optimize, which is advertised on this site somewhere I recently saw, and it too is very effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my part I have used Uniblue Registry Booster without any problems for a while several years ago. Lately I&#8217;ve been using PC Pitstop Optimize, which is advertised on this site somewhere I recently saw, and it too is very effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-note-before-modifying-your-windows-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-19611</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Faulkner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=8950#comment-19611</guid>
		<description>Personally, I don&#039;t like these kinds of programs. Modifying the registry manually I will do because I know _exactly_ what I am doing.

Programs which attempt to detect and repair errors can seriously mess up your system. Granted the odds of this are probably remote, I still avoid them. The reward of a potential few blinks of an eye in performance gain are not worth the risk of seriously messing up your system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t like these kinds of programs. Modifying the registry manually I will do because I know _exactly_ what I am doing.</p>
<p>Programs which attempt to detect and repair errors can seriously mess up your system. Granted the odds of this are probably remote, I still avoid them. The reward of a potential few blinks of an eye in performance gain are not worth the risk of seriously messing up your system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bud</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/a-note-before-modifying-your-windows-registry/comment-page-1/#comment-19599</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=8950#comment-19599</guid>
		<description>What is your opinion of the &quot;Free&quot; Registry Cleaners which are not free of course since maybe 15 of the errors can be deleted while the other 500 errors cannot be until one enrolls in the &quot;pay&quot; version.     Are these reliable?  Many of them would be very confusing when decisions are given to the user.  The explanations are usually way above the heads of most computer operators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is your opinion of the &#8220;Free&#8221; Registry Cleaners which are not free of course since maybe 15 of the errors can be deleted while the other 500 errors cannot be until one enrolls in the &#8220;pay&#8221; version.     Are these reliable?  Many of them would be very confusing when decisions are given to the user.  The explanations are usually way above the heads of most computer operators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
