<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All-In-One Security Suite Ratings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/all-in-one-security-suite-ratings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/all-in-one-security-suite-ratings/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/all-in-one-security-suite-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-17048</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6099#comment-17048</guid>
		<description>Because a bad experience with NIS passing all kind of spywares and/or virus,and requesting me to clean systems at a secure mode, (&quot;computer security&quot; must work the usual way ). I better prefer other suites,as Mc Afee,
AVG,Trend Micro,(or better yet),the use of Microsoft Windows Live One care that clean any kind of virus,spywares,troyan horses,and more,and a good system tune up,taking the computer
to a better performance.
Norton Internet Security is a bad choice if you care  about security</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because a bad experience with NIS passing all kind of spywares and/or virus,and requesting me to clean systems at a secure mode, (&#8221;computer security&#8221; must work the usual way ). I better prefer other suites,as Mc Afee,<br />
AVG,Trend Micro,(or better yet),the use of Microsoft Windows Live One care that clean any kind of virus,spywares,troyan horses,and more,and a good system tune up,taking the computer<br />
to a better performance.<br />
Norton Internet Security is a bad choice if you care  about security</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/all-in-one-security-suite-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-10143</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6099#comment-10143</guid>
		<description>sorry... wrong link... maybe the NEXT tab over on &quot;Products&quot; would have helped with that...

http://www.eset.com/smartsecurity/

forgive me... got to typing to fast...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry&#8230; wrong link&#8230; maybe the NEXT tab over on &#8220;Products&#8221; would have helped with that&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eset.com/smartsecurity/" rel="nofollow">http://www.eset.com/smartsecurity/</a></p>
<p>forgive me&#8230; got to typing to fast&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/all-in-one-security-suite-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-10112</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 03:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6099#comment-10112</guid>
		<description>Derek: I appreciate your comment, and the article you reference does rate eset very highly, but unless I missed something, I thought we were comparing all-in one packages for novis users, and this software apeares to be a AV only package. PS: I am not familuar with eset. I wish someone would compare all commerically availible AV softewares, strictly on merit, in one article, reguardless of who advertises where.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek: I appreciate your comment, and the article you reference does rate eset very highly, but unless I missed something, I thought we were comparing all-in one packages for novis users, and this software apeares to be a AV only package. PS: I am not familuar with eset. I wish someone would compare all commerically availible AV softewares, strictly on merit, in one article, reguardless of who advertises where.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Iannelli-Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/all-in-one-security-suite-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-10089</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Iannelli-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 12:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6099#comment-10089</guid>
		<description>1st, catchy headline, got me to read it right away... however, the date on the article you linked to was old (actually 6 months counting this month).
2nd.  PC mag tends to review the vendors that support its publication the most versus some vendors that actually have software that works better...

For instance:  http://www.eset.com/products/compare-NOD32-vs-competition.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1st, catchy headline, got me to read it right away&#8230; however, the date on the article you linked to was old (actually 6 months counting this month).<br />
2nd.  PC mag tends to review the vendors that support its publication the most versus some vendors that actually have software that works better&#8230;</p>
<p>For instance:  <a href="http://www.eset.com/products/compare-NOD32-vs-competition.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.eset.com/products/compare-NOD32-vs-competition.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/all-in-one-security-suite-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-10072</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 17:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6099#comment-10072</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s all the proof you need to know these reviews are rigged. They always are.
Like a political campaign - the more money big businesses put in to the campaign, the better kickbacks they get when their political figure wins.
Same with these kinds of reviews - companies pay big money to have the products rated highly. Those who don&#039;t know any better will then rely on these reviews to buy the product they need. It&#039;s basically advertising money really.
I never rely on &quot;paid&quot; reviews - I rely on tech forums and on people who actually use the product to gain my knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s all the proof you need to know these reviews are rigged. They always are.<br />
Like a political campaign &#8211; the more money big businesses put in to the campaign, the better kickbacks they get when their political figure wins.<br />
Same with these kinds of reviews &#8211; companies pay big money to have the products rated highly. Those who don&#8217;t know any better will then rely on these reviews to buy the product they need. It&#8217;s basically advertising money really.<br />
I never rely on &#8220;paid&#8221; reviews &#8211; I rely on tech forums and on people who actually use the product to gain my knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glc</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/all-in-one-security-suite-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-10069</link>
		<dc:creator>glc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 13:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6099#comment-10069</guid>
		<description>Not only didn&#039;t they test Panda and F-Secure, they didn&#039;t test AVG either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only didn&#8217;t they test Panda and F-Secure, they didn&#8217;t test AVG either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/all-in-one-security-suite-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-10060</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6099#comment-10060</guid>
		<description>Personally I would rather have the virus than use Norton or McAfee. Better choices would be Panda Software or F-Secure, but they are not on the list because they dont advertise enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I would rather have the virus than use Norton or McAfee. Better choices would be Panda Software or F-Secure, but they are not on the list because they dont advertise enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/all-in-one-security-suite-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-10055</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 16:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6099#comment-10055</guid>
		<description>Why reviewers always choose NIS &amp; KIS as the top security suite is beyond me. The resources NIS sucks out of your PC on boot are ridiculous. I myself am a fan of NIS, based on using it 5 years straight. It has a highly advanced firewall and virus definitions IMO. Only issue is that you get so used to resources being sucked bone dry that you tend to deal with it and become complacent.
I switched to BitDefender after a few recommendations and haven&#039;t looked back. It&#039;s very low on the resources, has a much easier interface to navigate and is easy to use for even the non-geeks out there :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why reviewers always choose NIS &amp; KIS as the top security suite is beyond me. The resources NIS sucks out of your PC on boot are ridiculous. I myself am a fan of NIS, based on using it 5 years straight. It has a highly advanced firewall and virus definitions IMO. Only issue is that you get so used to resources being sucked bone dry that you tend to deal with it and become complacent.<br />
I switched to BitDefender after a few recommendations and haven&#8217;t looked back. It&#8217;s very low on the resources, has a much easier interface to navigate and is easy to use for even the non-geeks out there <img src='http://www.pcmech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
