<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMD vs Intel 2007: State of the Processors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/amd-vs-intel-2007-state-of-the-processors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/amd-vs-intel-2007-state-of-the-processors/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:37:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin Hitchborn (hitchface)</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/amd-vs-intel-2007-state-of-the-processors/comment-page-1/#comment-4978</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Hitchborn (hitchface)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 06:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/amd-vs-intel-2007-state-of-the-processors/#comment-4978</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately it seemed to be the only thing they could do. The ATI purchase was crippling their finances, so production had to suffer. They have been the R&amp;D magicians for a good while, so that is one game they cannot afford to lose, whereas they will never (shouldn&#039;t say never I guess) match Intel&#039;s production capacity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately it seemed to be the only thing they could do. The ATI purchase was crippling their finances, so production had to suffer. They have been the R&amp;D magicians for a good while, so that is one game they cannot afford to lose, whereas they will never (shouldn&#8217;t say never I guess) match Intel&#8217;s production capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Moreno</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/amd-vs-intel-2007-state-of-the-processors/comment-page-1/#comment-4898</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Moreno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/amd-vs-intel-2007-state-of-the-processors/#comment-4898</guid>
		<description>AMD got in to a very dangerous game of selling their product
way too low, in hopes of beating Intel.That gamble cost them
huge amounts of cash and very well could have been their swan song. Maybe they will get lucky....Intel will buy them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMD got in to a very dangerous game of selling their product<br />
way too low, in hopes of beating Intel.That gamble cost them<br />
huge amounts of cash and very well could have been their swan song. Maybe they will get lucky&#8230;.Intel will buy them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Hitchborn (hitchface)</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/amd-vs-intel-2007-state-of-the-processors/comment-page-1/#comment-4691</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Hitchborn (hitchface)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/amd-vs-intel-2007-state-of-the-processors/#comment-4691</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t look at a company&#039;s growth or recession with a daily chart and make an accurate conclusion. Look quarterly, then yearly, then over a decade. Nothing happens overnight in this industry (though it certainly seems like it sometimes), so you need to take a look at wider statistics. According to quarterly reports, losses are being cut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t look at a company&#8217;s growth or recession with a daily chart and make an accurate conclusion. Look quarterly, then yearly, then over a decade. Nothing happens overnight in this industry (though it certainly seems like it sometimes), so you need to take a look at wider statistics. According to quarterly reports, losses are being cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David M</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/amd-vs-intel-2007-state-of-the-processors/comment-page-1/#comment-4686</link>
		<dc:creator>David M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/amd-vs-intel-2007-state-of-the-processors/#comment-4686</guid>
		<description>&quot;However, looking at the charts, we can see a very clear recovery happening.&quot;

This is a recovery? (Enter in AMD)
http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/advchart/frames/frames.asp?symb=&amp;time=&amp;freq=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;However, looking at the charts, we can see a very clear recovery happening.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a recovery? (Enter in AMD)<br />
<a href="http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/advchart/frames/frames.asp?symb=&amp;time=&amp;freq=" rel="nofollow">http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/advchart/frames/frames.asp?symb=&amp;time=&amp;freq=</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
