<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Another Fully Featured Free Firewall</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/another-fully-featured-free-firewall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/another-fully-featured-free-firewall/</link> <description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: marc</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/another-fully-featured-free-firewall/comment-page-1/#comment-32602</link> <dc:creator>marc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:47:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10317#comment-32602</guid> <description>Thanks, Jason, for the heads-up on the PC Tools FW. I&#039;ll check it out.I ran Comodo&#039;s 64-bit firewall for about a year. It&#039;s a very robust firewall with an amazing degree of features. It&#039;s also very user-intensive, much more so than any other firewall I have used. I would still be using it if it were more reliable, i.e., didn&#039;t get corrupted on a regular basis.The typical scenario would be a computer on my network would suddenly be unable to reach a printer hosted on the machine with Comodo. I&#039;d check this and that, even shut down Comodo and no joy. I would have to uninstall Comodo to restore network printing. Then I would reinstall it and everything would be fine... for a while, until it corrupted again. That got a little tiresome.This was the only issue I had with it and if you&#039;re not on a network it may function fine. It is an effective firewall.Ghostwall isn&#039;t bad, either, for a free firewall.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jason, for the heads-up on the PC Tools FW. I&#8217;ll check it out.</p><p>I ran Comodo&#8217;s 64-bit firewall for about a year. It&#8217;s a very robust firewall with an amazing degree of features. It&#8217;s also very user-intensive, much more so than any other firewall I have used. I would still be using it if it were more reliable, i.e., didn&#8217;t get corrupted on a regular basis.</p><p>The typical scenario would be a computer on my network would suddenly be unable to reach a printer hosted on the machine with Comodo. I&#8217;d check this and that, even shut down Comodo and no joy. I would have to uninstall Comodo to restore network printing. Then I would reinstall it and everything would be fine&#8230; for a while, until it corrupted again. That got a little tiresome.</p><p>This was the only issue I had with it and if you&#8217;re not on a network it may function fine. It is an effective firewall.</p><p>Ghostwall isn&#8217;t bad, either, for a free firewall.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cody</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/another-fully-featured-free-firewall/comment-page-1/#comment-32599</link> <dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:09:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10317#comment-32599</guid> <description>I have tried both. I had Comodo Firewall installed first and then switched to PC Tools. Everything was fine with Comodo no network problems etc. When I switched to PC Tools I had nothing but problems. Internet was going on and off and everything. I&#039;ll stay with Comodo.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried both. I had Comodo Firewall installed first and then switched to PC Tools. Everything was fine with Comodo no network problems etc. When I switched to PC Tools I had nothing but problems. Internet was going on and off and everything. I&#8217;ll stay with Comodo.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Silki @ Internet Security Blog</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/another-fully-featured-free-firewall/comment-page-1/#comment-32406</link> <dc:creator>Silki @ Internet Security Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:42:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10317#comment-32406</guid> <description>Hi Jason,
Thanks for the mention of the link.
I am the webmaster and sole author of the Internet Security Blog.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason,<br
/> Thanks for the mention of the link.<br
/> I am the webmaster and sole author of the Internet Security Blog.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 33/44 queries in 0.017 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.pcmech.com @ 2012-02-15 07:47:43 -->
