<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building A &#8220;Perfect&#8221; Windows PC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/building-a-perfect-windows-pc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/building-a-perfect-windows-pc/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sharron</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/building-a-perfect-windows-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-19527</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=8948#comment-19527</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll commentate on this article. In reverse order:

AMD processors are just as efficient as Intel if not more so. Quite obviously it&#039;s not possible to run an Intel CPU on an AMD socketed board; but, having used AMD processors in 98% of my builds I have no complaints.

If you&#039;re looking at building a &lt;strong&gt;gaming&lt;/strong&gt; PC, or are interested in &lt;strong&gt;overclocking&lt;/strong&gt;, then Intel is the processor brand you should use. However for general computing purposes, AMD is a good sturdy reliable chip.

(If you&#039;re going quad-core, Intel quad core 2 duos perform much better than all but the latest AMD Phenoms. Dual-core: AMD or Intel will suffice; bearing in mind the above paragraph.)

HCL: Well all I&#039;ll say on that is that Microsoft are being/have been sued for claiming that hardware is Vista compatible when in fact it&#039;ll only work with Vista Home Premium.

&lt;strong&gt;A few words on hard-drives:&lt;/strong&gt;

The Chinese-made Seagate hard-drives are worse than Maxtors; although the Korean-made Seagate drives are excellent. (At least this has been the case up until recently.)

Maxtors are throwaway drives. I think the entire tech industry is agreed on that. 

Hitachi are fairly-decent drives. I use them frequently and have had even less problems with them than with Seagate equivalents.

Rich recommends Western Digital whereas I&#039;m not at all keen on WD. We&#039;ll agree to differ. make up your own mind on which brand of hard-drive you use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll commentate on this article. In reverse order:</p>
<p>AMD processors are just as efficient as Intel if not more so. Quite obviously it&#8217;s not possible to run an Intel CPU on an AMD socketed board; but, having used AMD processors in 98% of my builds I have no complaints.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re looking at building a <strong>gaming</strong> PC, or are interested in <strong>overclocking</strong>, then Intel is the processor brand you should use. However for general computing purposes, AMD is a good sturdy reliable chip.</p>
<p>(If you&#8217;re going quad-core, Intel quad core 2 duos perform much better than all but the latest AMD Phenoms. Dual-core: AMD or Intel will suffice; bearing in mind the above paragraph.)</p>
<p>HCL: Well all I&#8217;ll say on that is that Microsoft are being/have been sued for claiming that hardware is Vista compatible when in fact it&#8217;ll only work with Vista Home Premium.</p>
<p><strong>A few words on hard-drives:</strong></p>
<p>The Chinese-made Seagate hard-drives are worse than Maxtors; although the Korean-made Seagate drives are excellent. (At least this has been the case up until recently.)</p>
<p>Maxtors are throwaway drives. I think the entire tech industry is agreed on that. </p>
<p>Hitachi are fairly-decent drives. I use them frequently and have had even less problems with them than with Seagate equivalents.</p>
<p>Rich recommends Western Digital whereas I&#8217;m not at all keen on WD. We&#8217;ll agree to differ. make up your own mind on which brand of hard-drive you use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
