<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>PCMech &#187; Hardware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/category/hardware/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
		<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9;PC Mechanic (www.pcmech.com) </copyright>
		<managingEditor>drisley@pcmech.com (PC Mechanic (www.pcmech.com))</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>drisley@pcmech.com(PC Mechanic (www.pcmech.com))</webMaster>
		<category></category>
		<ttl>1440</ttl>
		<itunes:keywords>computers,technology,internet,software,hardware,blogs</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle>Rich Menga discusses various issues in technology.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Listen in to the PC Mechanic podcast, from www.pcmech.com. Each week, Rich Menga will discuss a new issue in the world of technology.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>PC Mechanic (www.pcmech.com)</itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Technology"/>
<itunes:category text="Technology">
  <itunes:category text="Gadgets"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Technology">
  <itunes:category text="Tech News"/>
</itunes:category>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name>PC Mechanic (www.pcmech.com)</itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>drisley@pcmech.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://www.pcmech.com/design/pcmech_podcast_small.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>Make Money With Your Digital Camera</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/make-money-with-your-digital-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/make-money-with-your-digital-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Risley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stock photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Digital cameras are everywhere today. Just about everyone owns one. Not only that, they are good cameras. Even the cheapest digital cameras today are capable of taking really great photography if in the hands of somebody who knows how to do so.
Blatant Plug: We have just launched a brand new course at PCMech University which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digital cameras are everywhere today. Just about everyone owns one. Not only that, they are good cameras. Even the cheapest digital cameras today are capable of taking really great photography if in the hands of somebody who knows how to do so.</p>
<p>Blatant Plug: We have just launched a brand new course at <a href="http://www.pcmechuniversity.com">PCMech University</a> which is designed to give you tactics you need to know on how to take professional photographs using any standard digital camera. No, you don&#8217;t need the expensive model to make good images. The secret is in the person holding the camera, not the equipment (in most cases). Come by <a href="http://www.pcmechuniversity.com">PCMech University</a> for more information.</p>
<p>But, that&#8217;s not the purpose of this article. I promise. Let&#8217;s say you are taking some cool shots with your camera. What can you do with them besides impress yourself?</p>
<p><span id="more-6085"></span></p>
<h3>Go Quasi-Pro Online</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/digital-camera-749671.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" src="http://www.pcmech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/digital-camera-749671-thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="digital-camera-749671" width="240" height="223" align="right" /></a> Anybody who is a hobbyist photographer would love to make some money doing what they love - namely taking pictures. The Internet makes it much easier to do.</p>
<p>In the old days, you would need to make the right contacts and even strike up a deal with an agency. You&#8217;d have to send in your negatives and get approved, yada yada. Today, stock photography sites are online. And with photography being mostly digital today, you can now simply upload your photos.</p>
<p>One such site is <a href="http://www.istockphoto.com">iStockPhoto</a>. iStockPhoto is a large online marketplace for stock photography. Anybody looking to buy a photo for use on the web or in print advertising, for instance, can come to this site and buy rights to use a photo. That is what stock photography is all about. As a photographer, you can <a href="http://www.istockphoto.com/introduction_photographer.php">submit your photos to iStockPhoto</a> and earn money if anybody purchases your work. Pay rates usually hover around 20% of the purchase price. You can set the purchase price yourself (ranging from $1 up to $40).</p>
<p>Now, to keep the quality of the collection up, yes you do need to get approval from Istockphoto before you can participate. They will check the quality of the work as well as any possible copyright issues and appropriate model releases (if there are people in your photo).</p>
<p>Other sites you can check out are <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com">ShutterStock</a> (pays 25 cents per purchase, which can add up if you keep things fresh) <a href="http://www.shutterpoint.com/">ShutterPoint</a>, <a href="http://www.fotolia.com/">Fotolia</a> (between 30 cents and $1 per download) and <a href="http://www.dreamstime.com/">Dreamstime</a> (pays between 50% and 80% commission).</p>
<h3>Some Tips</h3>
<p>As I end off this article, here is some quick advice if you want to start making money doing this:</p>
<ol>
<li>Takes LOTS of pictures. As any photographer will tell you, you snap snap snap to end up with a few good ones.</li>
<li>Pay attention to what sells and take those kinds of photos. Feed the demand.</li>
</ol>
<p>If you take it seriously, then yes, you can make money with your digital camera. It doesn&#8217;t have to be a full-time job, either. It could be a spare time thing and still work out in your favor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/make-money-with-your-digital-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old Printer Tips: Convert, Network-Enable or Go Wireless</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/old-printer-tips-convert-network-enable-or-go-wireless/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/old-printer-tips-convert-network-enable-or-go-wireless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Menga</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bluetooth]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[centronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hewlett-packard]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[print server]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[printer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/old-printer-tips-convert-network-enable-or-go-wireless/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve been using computers a long while you probably have an old printer lying around somewhere. And it&#8217;s most likely true the only reason you don&#8217;t use it is either because:

It&#8217;s too big to fit on the desk.
It uses an insanely thick cable with a Centronics connector to connect to your computer.
Your computer (especially [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve been using computers a long while you probably have an old printer lying around somewhere. And it&#8217;s most likely true the only reason you don&#8217;t use it is either because:</p>
<ol type="a">
<li>It&#8217;s too big to fit on the desk.
<li>It uses an <em>insanely</em> thick cable with a <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=centronics">Centronics connector</a> to connect to your computer.
<li>Your computer (especially if a laptop) doesn&#8217;t have the port where that insanely thick cable is supposed to plug into.</li>
</ol>
<p>Assuming you can acquire a printer ribbon (if dot matrix) or replacement toner (if laser) for it, you can resurrect that printer using modern tech.</p>
<p><strong>Converting Centronics to USB</strong>: <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812107958">Only takes a single cable to do this</a>. And being the printer is old it&#8217;s more or less guaranteed to be recognized by your computer without the need to install any drivers whatsoever.</p>
<p><strong>Connect printer directly to the router</strong>: <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833122028">Requires a miniature print server</a>. This connects via Ethernet directly to the router and network-enables the printer. No connection to the computer required (but some setup does need to take place.)</p>
<p><strong>Connect printer over Bluetooth wireless</strong>: <a href="http://www.usbgear.com/USBG-0260.html">Requires an (expensive) adapter</a>. Also may require <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833127117">another (not-so-expensive) USB Bluetooth adapter</a> if your PC isn&#8217;t Bluetooth-enabled. The adapter mentioned for the printer does Centronics <em>and</em> USB! Wireless range is stated to be 100 meters (328 feet) but in practical application you&#8217;re &#8220;safe&#8221; with about 25 meters (82 feet) at the most. Works well in most instances. The best part is that you can have the printer in a completely separate room - leaving you more desk space.</p>
<h3>Some quick truths about older printers</h3>
<p><strong>Dot matrix printers</strong> while loud and have a slow PPM (page per minute) speed have two distinct advantages.</p>
<ol>
<li>Tractor feed paper, if available, <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/IBM-14-7-8-11-Continuous-Tractor-Feed-Printer-Paper_W0QQitemZ150200680342QQihZ005QQcategoryZ86728QQrdZ1QQssPageNameZWD1VQQcmdZViewItemQQ_trksidZp1638Q2em118Q2el1247">is dirt cheap</a>.</li>
<li>You can easily go for an entire year without having to change the printer ribbon.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Older business-grade HP LaserJet printers</strong> also have a slow PPM but have the following advantages.</p>
<ol>
<li>New toner, shockingly, is sometimes cheaper than inkjet replacement cartridges.</li>
<li>Toner lasts far longer than inkjet cartridges do.</li>
<li>Biz-grade LaserJets can be easily serviced. Chances are high that there&#8217;s a local certified HP tech close to where you live - and he does house calls.</li>
<li>Older LaserJets require <strong>no stupid proprietary drivers</strong> because support is built-in to the OS. Windows, Mac and Linux will &#8220;see&#8221; these printers with no fuss, no muss.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/old-printer-tips-convert-network-enable-or-go-wireless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buy Replacement Laptop Batteries Off eBay</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/buy-replacement-laptop-batteries-off-ebay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/buy-replacement-laptop-batteries-off-ebay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 07:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Faulkner</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Tips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We recently had a laptop battery go dead (well, it wouldn&#8217;t hold a charge for over 10 minutes) on us and needed a replacement. The laptop (a Dell), itself is about 3 year old but running like a champ (knock on wood). So we call up Dell and find out the battery will cost over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We recently had a laptop battery go dead (well, it wouldn&#8217;t hold a charge for over 10 minutes) on us and needed a replacement. The laptop (a Dell), itself is about 3 year old but running like a champ (knock on wood). So we call up Dell and find out the battery will cost over $300 and wouldn&#8217;t ship for over a month&#8230; seriously.</p>
<p>No thanks we said and went over to eBay and found the exact same part number, brand new, for $80. We placed the order and the part shipped the next day. A 375+% savings isn&#8217;t bad at all.</p>
<p>So the next time you need a part for something off-warranty, consider eBay. There are tons of surplus resellers which are running constant &#8220;Buy It Now&#8221; auctions so you can get exactly what you need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/buy-replacement-laptop-batteries-off-ebay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reducing Power Usage On Overclocked PC&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/reducing-power-usage-on-overclocked-pcs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/reducing-power-usage-on-overclocked-pcs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 07:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Faulkner</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Tips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Power &amp; Chassis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reduce power consumption]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[save energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of you computer enthusiasts out there like to overclock your PC&#8217;s (personally, I avoid it like the plague), however a direct side effect to this is the increased power usage your steroid pumped PC consumes. Increased power usage not only contributes to a higher power bill, but also increased output of heat (which will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of you computer enthusiasts out there like to overclock your PC&#8217;s (personally, I avoid it like the plague), however a direct side effect to this is the increased power usage your steroid pumped PC consumes. Increased power usage not only contributes to a higher power bill, but also increased output of heat (which will cost even more to cool down with the summer months approaching).</p>
<p>Well, give your overclocked PC a power reducing tune-up with the help of this Tech ARP article titled &#8220;<a href="http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=537">Reducing The Power Consumption Of Overclocked PCs</a>&#8220;. From what I gathered in the article, the steps which decrease power usage have no noticable impact on the performance of your overclocked PC, so you have nothing to lose&#8230; except some power consumption.</p>
<p>After all, if you are overclocking, you probably like to tweak&#8230; this helps you make more tweaks to save some cash to apply to your next project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/reducing-power-usage-on-overclocked-pcs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;In The Beginning&#8230;&#8221; - My First Computer</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/in-the-beginning-my-first-computer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/in-the-beginning-my-first-computer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Dyok</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[first computer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I broke into the world of computers and technology at around the ripe old age of 10. Not so amazing really, but remember&#8230;that was in 1984&#8230;back when most people on the street didn&#8217;t know what a computer was. The day my father came home from Radio Shack with a brand new Tandy 1000 was the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I broke into the world of computers and technology at around the ripe old age of 10. Not so amazing really, but remember&#8230;that was in 1984&#8230;back when most people on the street didn&#8217;t know what a computer was. The day my father came home from Radio Shack with a brand new Tandy 1000 was the beginning of what has turned into a passion for technology.<span id="more-6119"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://bizriver.com/blog/imgs/tandy1000.png" alt="" align="right" />The Tandy 1000, introduced in 1984, was manufactured to compete directly with the IBM PC. The one I had came standard 128Kb of RAM, one double density 5.25&#8243; floppy disk drive and a 16 color RGB monitor. As add-ons, dad had the foresight to also purchase a matching dot-matrix printer and a Tandy joystick. The system ran on MS DOS 2.11 (maybe the most stable Microsoft OS to date?) and came bundled with DeskMate 1.0. DeskMate was pretty remarkable for it&#8217;s time. It was a word processor, spreadsheet, database and calendaring suite that fit on a single 5.25&#8243; floppy&#8230;let&#8217;s see Microsoft Office do that!</p>
<p><strong>Messing with DeskMate (not me and version 2, but still the same DeskMate)</strong></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="355" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KRiS_o1NWpQ&amp;rel=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KRiS_o1NWpQ&amp;rel=1" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I cut my teeth on. There was nobody to ask questions to, no classes to take. I taught myself BASIC programming from the rudimentary manual that came with the system and hours of trial and error. We still had this system up until last year when an unfortunate flood at my parents&#8217; washed this part of my past away&#8230;but the memories remain.</p>
<p>What was your first computer? How did it all start for you? Leave a comment and share with the community at large. I would sure be interested in hearing about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/in-the-beginning-my-first-computer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Directx 11 to Reveal a New Era of Graphics</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/directx-11-to-reveal-a-new-era-of-graphics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/directx-11-to-reveal-a-new-era-of-graphics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Naylor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video Cards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ATI]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DirectX]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ray tracing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor&#8217;s Note 4/49/08 12:36 PM: OK, I&#8217;ll admit it. I got HAD by this article. It was based on an April&#8217;s Fools joke and made it&#8217;s way to PCMech well after April Fools. I&#8217;ll leave it up here since people have already commented on it. I&#8217;m not sure if Nathan (the author) knew it was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Editor&#8217;s Note 4/49/08 12:36 PM</strong>: OK, I&#8217;ll admit it. I got HAD by this article. It was based on an April&#8217;s Fools joke and made it&#8217;s way to PCMech well after April Fools. I&#8217;ll leave it up here since people have already commented on it. I&#8217;m not sure if Nathan (the author) knew it was a farce, but one thing is for sure: I need to pay much better attention when I&#8217;m publishing guest posts for PCMech. Sheesh&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8211;START OF THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE&#8211;</p>
<p>It has been announced that DirectX 11 will include a completely new type of graphics rendering called ray-tracing. Wait a minute. It’s not new. In fact, it’s been around since the 80’s. How come it took so long to be implemented for public use? How does it work? What advantages does it have over current-gen graphics? These questions are about to be answered.</p>
<p><span id="more-6060"></span></p>
<h3>Ray-Tracing</h3>
<p>Ray-Tracing was first introduced in 1986, and is basically defined as tracing the paths of light as they interact with objects. This is essentially what our eyes do, so it creates quite a vivid and realistic picture. Unfortunately it wasn&#8217;t practical to use in everyday graphics because it took up so much raw power to compute. It was used scarcely in the 90&#8217;s, but only for demonstrations and now in the 21st century with multi-core technology it is finally possible to make Ray-Tracing practical.</p>
<p>So what happened? Well the movie-industry took advantage of it right off the bat. Many special effects were ray-traced to give a more realistic look. The movie <em>Beowulf</em> was entirely ray-traced. It wasn’t perfect, but it was damn close, and a heck of a lot better than what people have now. To give you an example of how much power it takes to ray-trace though, a person created a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLte5f34ya8">video of real-time ray tracing of a convertible on YouTube</a>, and it takes the combined effort of THREE PS3 consoles. You can check it out here, it&#8217;s pretty cool. Remember each PS3 has 8 processors (6 active), so we are looking at over 20 processors for one, non-moving object.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/sony-ps3-sales-uk.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" src="http://www.pcmech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/sony-ps3-sales-uk-thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="Sony_PS3_sales_UK" width="169" height="244" align="right" /></a> Hmm. This is starting to explain some things. Like Why <a href="http://www.nvidia.com">Nvidia</a> did not support DX10.1 on their 9-series cards, and not have any new technology on the cards other than smaller chip-sizes. They realized that the old ways of graphics are dying. What’s the point of Directx 10.1 anyway? Rasterisation, what Nvidia and <a href="http://www.ati.com">ATI</a> use, has reached its peak. They both have perfected the art of essentially faking graphics. Now it’s time for the real stuff. It’s an open field, and apparently <a href="http://www.intel.com">Intel</a> is planning on joining the competition. They recently have been experimenting with combining a processor with the graphics card with successful results. This could spell bad news for both ATI and Nvidia, but knowing the way Intel prices things I’m sure there will still be close competition.</p>
<p>An interesting thing about ray-tracing is that it is fairly scalable. With rasterisation, you notice less and less with each improvement. For example the new 8-core skull-trail beast from Intel hardly earns gamers a few FPS on rasterisation. For ray-tracing however, it will be exactly 8 times better than a single-core. So what will this do? Well there will probably be a new multi-core processor every couple months, possibly reaching over 100 before 2010. If each has implemented graphics with ray-tracing technology, you can see the benefit of that over getting a separate graphics card.</p>
<h3>Benefits of Ray Tracing</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/ray-tracedvsrasterized.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" src="http://www.pcmech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/ray-tracedvsrasterized-thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="Ray-tracedVsRasterized" width="196" height="322" align="right" /></a> By now you probably want to see what ray-tracing can do compared to rasterizing. Well take a look at this image on the right. As you can plainly see, the ray-tracing image has more realistic reflections and shadows. Nvidia has worked their butts with their 3D shader processors, but they could never get anything close to this. It’s very encouraging to see the difference, but remember we are a ways off from getting objects of that clarity interactive on our computers. Directx 11 is only going to support a few limited things, so that the transition to ray-tracing is gradual, and not all at once. I won’t be surprised if Ray-Tracing Processing Units (RPU’s) are implemented on the Nvidia 10 series cards. At first maybe only characters are ray-traced. Then as new hardware is introduced, textures and objects within certain draw distance are ray-traced, until eventually everything as far as the eye can see is ray-traced and rasterisation becomes a thing of the past.</p>
<h3>And This Matters Because&#8230;</h3>
<p>Is this a good thing? Maybe. Everything would be a lot more predictable and you would be able to confidently tell which brand of graphics card is better just by looking at the data sheet, unlike today, where the only real way of telling which of two cards are better is by rigorously testing them in 3D programs, measuring their temperatures, calculating wattage, etc. So there will be two consequences. Either we will finally end the number game by being able to really tell what is what without any background info, or, more likely, it will simply enter the next stage of confusing the common public in return for profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/directx-11-to-reveal-a-new-era-of-graphics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For Those Of You With Pets</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/for-those-of-you-with-pets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/for-those-of-you-with-pets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 07:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Faulkner</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Tips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cleaning]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I wrote about periodically cleaning out the insides of your computer, but I thought I would post a follow up for those who have pets.
We have a couple of cats and a dog, all of which shed a good bit. Of course, this creates a problem as whenever I clean out my computer, there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I wrote about periodically <a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/cleaning-out-the-insidescleaning-out-the-insides/">cleaning out the insides of your computer</a>, but I thought I would post a follow up for those who have pets.</p>
<p>We have a couple of cats and a dog, all of which shed a good bit. Of course, this creates a problem as whenever I clean out my computer, there is an abundance of pet hair which accumulates on the inside (having hardwood floors doesn&#8217;t help this either) of the computer.</p>
<p>If you do a Google search, you can find a variety of methods for managing this, from <a href="http://www.lockergnome.com/it/2007/11/01/keeping-dog-hair-out/">the very simple</a> to <a href="http://www.computerdust.com/">the really extreme</a>, however the most effective method I have found is that by simply moving the computer case off the floor, the hair doesn&#8217;t accumulate nearly as much. Granted, you do have to give up some desk space to accomplish this, but overall it is very effective.</p>
<p>If anyone has any other ideas on how to keep the pet hair out, please post them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/for-those-of-you-with-pets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cleaning Out The Insides</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/cleaning-out-the-insides/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/cleaning-out-the-insides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Faulkner</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Tips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cleaning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Periodically, it is a good idea to clean out the inside of your computer. Doing so prevents dust from building up on your components which acts as an insulator to bottle in heat. There are many different ways to go about cleaning your computer (for example, see this article), but personally, I just do the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Periodically, it is a good idea to clean out the inside of your computer. Doing so prevents dust from building up on your components which acts as an insulator to bottle in heat. There are many different ways to go about cleaning your computer (for example, <a href="http://www.smartcomputing.com/editorial/article.asp?guid=&amp;bJumpto=true&amp;Isfrm=IN&amp;article=articles/webonly/techsupport/03w10/03w10.asp&amp;ArticleID=31191">see this article</a>), but personally, I just do the basics which involves:</p>
<ul>
<li>Blowing out the inside of the case with compressed air.</li>
<li>Wiping the case (not the components!) with a slightly damp cloth.</li>
<li>Making sure all the connections and plugs are tight.</li>
</ul>
<p>Of course, before you do any of this, you should take your computer outside (you don&#8217;t want to get dust everywhere after all) and make sure you ground yourself before opening your computer.</p>
<p>It takes about 10-15 minutes and I do this about every 6 months, give or take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/cleaning-out-the-insides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VPN - The Fastest Way to Get Hacked!</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/vpn-fastest-way-to-get-hacked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/vpn-fastest-way-to-get-hacked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Risley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[LAN]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[VPN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As with all network devices, once you leave the safety of the local area network (LAN) and connect to the Wide Area Network (WAN) or World Wide Web (WWW) your protocol is subject to attack by the unscrupulous that inhabit the WWW.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a guest post authored by Monte Russel.</em></p>
<p>VPN (Virtual Personal Network) is very convent way to connect while you are away from your normal network. This is a network protocol that builds a private path or tunnel from your computer to the network you want to connect to. A lot of companies utilize this protocol for their employees to connect to the business network while traveling or working from home.</p>
<p>As with all network devices, once you leave the safety of the local area network (LAN) and connect to the Wide Area Network (WAN) or World Wide Web (WWW) your protocol is subject to attack by the unscrupulous that inhabit the WWW. Hackers, thieves, and criminals have tools to defeat a normal VPN’s security. To be safest, you or your company should invest in a commercial VPN package.</p>
<p>A commercial package will have encryption as part of the VPN. With the encryption you will have two keys, a private key and a public key. Only you know the password to the private key and only the company knows the public key. For a hacker to gain access to the encrypted data you are sending back and forth on the VPN they have to crack both keys the public and the private key. By the time they have cracked the key you will have ended your session and move away from their locality. That is unless you establish your VPN and leave it on for a long period of time, a very long time. At this time the best programs that can recover passwords take anywhere from two days to a week to get the password to a 16 bit encrypted key. Newer programs use 58 bit or 64 bit encryption keys.</p>
<p>So now you want to know if your VPN is encrypted? Well one way to know is ask your IT department. Another is when you installed your VPN did you have a ‘Certificate’ that you had to install and then create a password? If you have a certificate and had to create a password then type random characters on the key board to create the key you have encryption.</p>
<p>If you don’t have encryption I suggest you contact your IT Director or Manager and find out why your VPN is open to anyone who wants to connect while you are connected. An open VPN is an invitation not only to the data you are transferring back and forth but to the sending and receiving computers. It is like an open door on a hot summer day, any thing can and will come in to the house.</p>
<p>To read more about the VPN Protocol see this RFC:<br />
<a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2401.txt">Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol</a><br />
<a href="http://www.diy-computer-repair.com/vpn.html">http://www.diy-computer-repair.com/vpn.html</a></p>
<p><strong>About The Author:</strong> Monte Russell is a certified Systems Engineer with a degree in Computer Electronics Technology, MCSE, CNA, A+, and many commercial hardware certificates. His web site <a href="http://www.diy-computer-repair.com">www.diy-computer-repair.com</a> offers insight in to self computer repair. His free monthly newsletter is always intriguing and full of insights about computing. Subscribe for free at <a href="http://www.diy-computer-repair.com/newsletter-signup.html">http://www.diy-computer-repair.com/newsletter-signup.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/vpn-fastest-way-to-get-hacked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Streaming Cam Wars: Webcam vs. Camcorder</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/online-streaming-cam-wars-webcam-vs-camcorder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/online-streaming-cam-wars-webcam-vs-camcorder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Menga</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[camcorder]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PCMech Videos]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[webcam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/online-streaming-cam-wars-webcam-vs-camcorder/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the live stream I periodically get asked what webcam I use and how I get the image to look at good as it does.
I inform that yes I use a Microsoft Lifecam VX-3000. It does the job and does it well for live streaming.
However I will be the first to admit it&#8217;s not perfect. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the live stream I periodically get asked what webcam I use and how I get the image to look at good as it does.</p>
<p>I inform that yes I use a Microsoft Lifecam VX-3000. It does the job and does it well for live streaming.</p>
<p>However I will be the first to admit it&#8217;s not perfect. There are drawbacks to webcams, such as:</p>
<p><strong>Tiny lens</strong></p>
<p>The itty bitty lens only allows for the bare minimum of focal length. In layman&#8217;s terms that means anything over 10 feet away will most likely be out of focus. If you&#8217;re sitting in front of your computer, you&#8217;re good to go. If it&#8217;s far away.. well.. don&#8217;t expect a perfect picture.</p>
<p><strong>Light overcompensation</strong></p>
<p>Aside from the manual focus ring on most webcams, all functions of the webcam are software based. While this is convenient it is at the same time very frustrating.</p>
<p>The single largest complaint of anyone who uses a webcam is that &#8220;static&#8221; appears when the light is too low. What the webcam tries to do at that point is &#8220;grab&#8221; light from anywhere in the frame, and if it finds none it will literally fabricate pseudo-light which appears to the eye as static.</p>
<p><strong>Minimal data transfer</strong></p>
<p>Your webcam is most likely connected via USB 2.0 spec. As anyone knows, USB is great but not exactly fast concerning transfer speed. Your best bet is to stick to 320&#215;240 resolution. Some webcams do 640&#215;480 (and even 800&#215;600 for some), but the end result is that you&#8217;re pushing thru USB 2.0.</p>
<p>If you ever wondered &#8220;Why does my video look so much better at a low frame rate compared to high?&#8221;, it&#8217;s because the lower frame rates allow for higher bigger-data frames at the expense of frame rate.</p>
<h3>The advantages of using a camcorder</h3>
<p><strong>Big lens with true optical focus</strong></p>
<p>The larger lens makes a huge difference, and additionally has true optical focus. Even if you were standing 50 feet away from the camera, you would still be in focus.</p>
<p><strong>Auto-focus</strong></p>
<p>The vast majority of webcams don&#8217;t have auto-focus. Camcorders do and they adjust very quickly.</p>
<p><strong>Colors that look more &#8220;real&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Again this is from the larger lens; it&#8217;s able to capture more of what the true image looks like and the difference can be seen easily.</p>
<p><strong>Firewire</strong></p>
<p>Firewire (IEEE 1394) is obviously superior to USB in every way. You can transfer much more data over the wire.</p>
<p><strong>Vastly superior microphone</strong></p>
<p>The on-board microphone on almost all camcorders have built-in noise reduction <em>and</em> compression. If you&#8217;re right next to the cam it&#8217;s almost the same as speaking into a vocal microphone. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s sadly true that on even the most expensive webcams the microphones are absolute junk. Not so on camcorders.</p>
<p><strong>Any disadvantages?</strong></p>
<p>There are two. </p>
<p>The camcorder is bulky and usually requires to be mounted on a tripod. If you can deal with the bulky-ness of the camcorder, go for it.</p>
<p>Connecting devices over Firewire, while great, may sometimes cause your computer and/or software to &#8220;think&#8221; about it more because of the high data transfer rate. USB 2.0 never has this problem. While it&#8217;s true you can run a Firewire-based webcam and still multitask without issue, periodically you may encounter a software lock-up (usually your camera software). This happens no matter what OS you&#8217;re using, be it Windows or OS X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/online-streaming-cam-wars-webcam-vs-camcorder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
