<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PCMech &#187; Memory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/category/hardware/memory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:32:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s The Best Advantage Of Building A PC?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-best-advantage-of-building-a-pc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-best-advantage-of-building-a-pc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Menga</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherboards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buliding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[components]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-best-advantage-of-building-a-pc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The single largest advantage of building is the ability to transfer parts from build to build. What this means is that when I upgrade, I don&#8217;t have to build a complete computer each time. And this is where the true savings come in when you build PCs.
For example, I don&#8217;t have to buy a new [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-best-advantage-of-building-a-pc/">What&#8217;s The Best Advantage Of Building A PC?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The single largest advantage of building is the ability to transfer parts from build to build. What this means is that when I upgrade, I don&#8217;t have to build a complete computer each time. And this is where the true savings come in when you build PCs.</p>
<p>For example, I don&#8217;t have to buy a new case, nor do I have to buy a new optical drive. I also don&#8217;t need new audio speakers, mouse, keyboard or monitor. In my current setup I could also transfer over my video card as well.</p>
<p>When you add these things up it shaves off a lot of cash you would otherwise have to spend.</p>
<p>Many PCMech readers have built PCs before, but if you&#8217;re someone who hasn&#8217;t yet, I can say without question that your most expensive build will probably be the first one. And this is because you have nothing to transfer from a previous build. Everything must be bought new and yes, it can get costly &#8211; but only for the first time around.</p>
<p>What you can do is think of the future when building your first box so it will cost less when you upgrade later. The checklist is short and easy to remember.</p>
<h3>Future-use things to consider when PC building</h3>
<p><strong>Computer Case</strong></p>
<p>Your case should be a full-sized tower. The reason is so you can use standard ATX <em>or</em> MicroATX motherboards. This gives you more choice of what motherboard you want to use now and in the future.</p>
<p>The case you buy should be above average. You want something built well that will withstand the test of time. Being that your intent is to use the same case over and over, build quality matters.</p>
<p><strong>Motherboard</strong></p>
<p>Use a motherboard that supports several different types of processors. The better ones support at least four. <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813121338">This Intel motherboard</a> for example does just that. For now maybe you want a Core 2 Duo processor but later on want to upgrade to a Quad-core. Using a motherboard that supports multiple CPU types will save you cash because you don&#8217;t have to buy another board when ready to upgrade.</p>
<p>Also bear in mind the new board you buy should support (at the time of this writing) a minimum of 8GB of RAM which the one linked above does. If you buy a new board that only supports 4GB, that&#8217;s your limit &#8211; and that&#8217;s not good. 8GB should stay current for at least 5 years, and you can incrementally update as needed.</p>
<p><strong>Optical Drive</strong></p>
<p>This is something you don&#8217;t have to put a ton of cash into because more people are moving away from the optical format in favor of flash-based media.</p>
<p>Concerning this particular component, the key is to avoid things you don&#8217;t need that add extra cost, such as:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightscribe"><em>LightScribe</em></a> &#8211; This is more for &quot;cool factor&quot; than anything else. You&#8217;re better off just labeling your discs with a Sharpie marker. It&#8217;s cheaper and does the same job. True, it doesn&#8217;t look as professional, but nobody cares.</li>
<li><em>Super fast DVD burning</em> &#8211; Not necessary. Why? Because getting blank media that supports the higher speeds costs more and probably isn&#8217;t available on the shelf where you buy discs. Most of the time the blank media you buy will be 12x max write speed for DVD and 30x max for CD, so the fact your drive can burn faster means nothing unless you&#8217;re willing to custom order blank discs that support it &#8211; which you probably won&#8217;t.</li>
<li><em>Blu-Ray compatible</em> &#8211; Again, not necessary. The only people truly interested in this format are those who have Blu-ray players for their television. And yes, you will get a big-big 25GB of storage on one of these BD-R discs, <em>but</em>, <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817132051">each disc at present costs $5</a> &#8211; and that doesn&#8217;t include shipping. You&#8217;re better off using flash-based media, if only for the fact that write/rewrite is much easier and faster compared to optical.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Input Devices (Keyboard and Mouse)</strong></p>
<p>Concerning the mouse, make sure it connects via USB. With wireless, go for RF and not Bluetooth. For example, a really kick-ass wireless mouse is the <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826104203">Logitech G7</a>. It&#8217;s got a ridiculous price tag (but worth it to some) and is USB/RF-wireless based. And don&#8217;t worry, there are plenty of RF-wireless USB mice that are much lower in price, <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826105046">like this one</a>.</p>
<p>Note that there&#8217;s nothing bad or wrong about Bluetooth wireless, but you get more choice with RF. <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&amp;N=2010290065%201083007044&amp;name=RF%20Wireless">A lot more</a>.</p>
<p>Concerning the keyboard, you want something that will stand the test of time like your computer case. There are many keyboard makes to choose from, but typically the best for long-term use are made by Microsoft and Logitech. Sure, other keyboards have lots of whiz-bang features on it, but what matters most is comfort and longevity.</p>
<p>With Microsoft and Logitech it&#8217;s the simple things that make them better, such as not having the lettering literally wear off your keys in less than six months.</p>
<p>Of course, neither beat the best computer keyboard of all time, the <a href="http://www.clickykeyboards.com/">IBM Model M</a>. But that takes a little bit of doing (i.e. a USB converter) to make the older ones work. And lets not forget they&#8217;re frickin&#8217; loud. A resounding CLICK-CLACK happens every time you press a key on one of those. But it&#8217;s a good sound. At least I think so. <img src='http://www.pcmech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>Audio speakers</strong></p>
<p>The only rule to follow here is to use an audio speaker setup that is not overly dependent on software. And what I mean by that is you should not buy speakers that <em>require</em> software just to hear sound come out of them.</p>
<p>Whatever you buy should work like this: Open the box, take the speakers out, plug the AC adapter into the wall, plug in the audio cable to the sound card, done.</p>
<p>Software that controls the sound card is fine (and necessary). Software that&#8217;s required just to make the speakers work is bad.</p>
<p>If you want an example of bad, Creative is notorious for having speaker setups that are too &quot;attached&quot; to software, so to speak. And without their proprietary software installed, the speakers either sound like crap or not work at all. Not good.</p>
<h3>Final notes</h3>
<p>Many people make the mistake of building a PC that only has &quot;right-now&quot; tech in it, meaning the end build will not stay current for more than 2 years at the most. </p>
<p>For example, let&#8217;s say you bought a brand new motherboard today but it can only use a Core 2 Duo processor as the fastest it will support. That&#8217;s a mistake. Yes, the Core 2 right now is fast &#8211; but it won&#8217;t be 2 years from now and you&#8217;ll be forced to buy another motherboard later when the time comes. What you should have done is bought a board that can support Core 2 or Quad-core. When the Core 2 becomes too slow, it&#8217;s not a problem because you can upgrade to a Quad-core and get another 2 or 3 years out of the same motherboard, thereby saving you money.</p>
<p>When building your first (or next) computer box, consider the future. Buying the right stuff the first time and spending a little extra means savings for the long-term.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-best-advantage-of-building-a-pc/">What&#8217;s The Best Advantage Of Building A PC?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-best-advantage-of-building-a-pc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4GB USB Sticks Now At&#8230; Walgreen&#8217;s?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/4gb-usb-sticks-now-at-walgreens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/4gb-usb-sticks-now-at-walgreens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Menga</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cruzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/4gb-usb-sticks-now-at-walgreens/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sign of the times: I go into Walgreen&#8217;s the other day to pick up a bag of cashews (they&#8217;re quite tasty), and in the photo center I spot 4GB USB sticks for $16. Yes, I know you can pick up these things for cheaper elsewhere, but the fact a business primarily known as a pharmacy [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/4gb-usb-sticks-now-at-walgreens/">4GB USB Sticks Now At&#8230; Walgreen&#8217;s?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sign of the times: I go into <a href="http://www.walgreens.com">Walgreen&#8217;s</a> the other day to pick up a bag of cashews (they&#8217;re quite tasty), and in the photo center I spot 4GB USB sticks for $16. Yes, I know you can pick up these things for cheaper <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820141259">elsewhere</a>, but the fact a business primarily known as a <em>pharmacy</em> carries these things is what got my attention.</p>
<p>The brand Walgreen&#8217;s carried was obviously generic and not something you&#8217;d recognize. This got me wondering whether there is a true difference quality and reliability-wise concerning the flash memory inside a USB stick from one brand to the next.</p>
<p>Curious, I searched the internet to see if anyone has done any testing of flash memory reliability on a brand level.</p>
<p>One such place is CNET and they have <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/4566-3233_7-0.html">a whole section on it</a>. It includes just about every type of flash memory you can imagine with editors reviews, video and so on. The brand <em>you</em> have right now might be listed there, so you can see how it fared out.</p>
<p>The 2 top-rated brands for USB sticks are Sandisk and Lexar.</p>
<p>For everything else, the two top complaints are usually the same concerning USB sticks, that being &quot;slow write speed&quot; and design complaints (i.e. the plastic cap falls off easily, flimsy covering, etc.)</p>
<p>It would appear that yes, there <em>are</em> notable differences from one brand to the next. While a design flaw may be something most people could live with, slow write speeds would drive anyone bonkers (especially considering USB 2.0 transfer speeds are <em>already</em> slow to begin with).</p>
<p>The advice of the moment I give is this:</p>
<p>If you see some generic brand of USB stick, it&#8217;s a crapshoot whether or not the design will be solid or flimsy, and whether or not the data transfer will be speedy or not. It might be <a href="http://shop.ebay.com/items/_W0QQ_nkwZsandiskQ20cruzerQQ_armrsZ1QQ_fromZR40QQ_mdoZ">a few extra bucks for a Sandisk cruzer</a>, but at least you&#8217;ll know what you buy will work optimally as it should.</p>
<p>(And by the way, yes the previous link will show you some 16GB versions of Sandisk cruzers. Pretty neat you can put 16GB in your pocket, eh?)</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/4gb-usb-sticks-now-at-walgreens/">4GB USB Sticks Now At&#8230; Walgreen&#8217;s?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/4gb-usb-sticks-now-at-walgreens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is 2GB RAM Now The Standard?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Menga</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2GB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No matter what your operating system is, a question many ask is &#34;What should I have to do modern computing?&#34; In this article we&#8217;ll address RAM specifically. Should you run 2GB or can you get away with 1GB or 512MB? 
First, a quick look at cost.
Cost-wise, RAM is the cheapest it&#8217;s ever been. 2GB Desktop [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/">Is 2GB RAM Now The Standard?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter what your operating system is, a question many ask is &quot;What should I have to do modern computing?&quot; In this article we&#8217;ll address RAM specifically. Should you run 2GB or can you get away with 1GB or 512MB? </p>
<p><strong>First, a quick look at cost.</strong></p>
<p>Cost-wise, RAM is the cheapest it&#8217;s ever been. 2GB Desktop PC memory is <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&amp;N=2010170147%201052308477&amp;bop=And&amp;Order=PRICE">under the 25-dollar mark</a>, so assuming your computer can support it physically, there&#8217;s no reason not to go 2GB.</p>
<p><strong>Second, a look at operating systems.</strong></p>
<p>32-bit Windows NT, 2000 and XP will easily support 2GB RAM on-board. And although you could put in 4 it is unlikely you&#8217;ll see any difference performance-wise (<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/pae/paemem.mspx">assuming the OS can even access it</a>).</p>
<p>The same can be said for Mac OS X and Linux on a 32-bit platform as a desktop OS. In general use you will not see any huge leaps in performance from 2GB to 4GB RAM. Maybe if you were running a server you would, but on the desktop side, most likely not.</p>
<p><strong>Third, a look at performance (the performance that matters, that is).</strong></p>
<p>The Big Question: Will you see a performance improvement going from 512MB or 1GB to 2GB? Yes &#8211; but not necessarily in the way you would expect.</p>
<p>For example, if you upgrade from 1GB to 2GB, here&#8217;s what you can expect:</p>
<ul>
<li>Faster application launch and shutdown times. </li>
<li>The ability to run more apps at once without having your computer &quot;think&quot; about it as much. </li>
<li>Smoother switching between apps. </li>
<li>Smoother web browsing (especially on Flash-intensive web pages). </li>
</ul>
<p>And here&#8217;s what <strong>not to expect</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li>Better gameplay on high-end video games. (This is highly dependent on not only RAM but video card RAM, clock speed and hard drive access times &#8211; just the RAM upgrade isn&#8217;t enough.) </li>
<li>Better video performance. (That&#8217;s the video card&#8217;s job &#8211; not the physical RAM&#8217;s job.) </li>
<li>Faster large-file read/write. (Even with more memory, if your hard drive access times are slow, that has everything to do with the hard drive and nothing to do with physical RAM.) </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Is 2GB RAM now the standard?</strong></p>
<p>I say yes. The RAM is dirt cheap, the installation takes only minutes and there&#8217;s nothing in your operating system you have to change or adjust once installed. Just install, boot and enjoy.</p>
<p>If you have absolutely no idea how to fit RAM for your computer, head over to <a href="http://www.crucial.com">www.crucial.com</a>, select your make/line/model and it does all the work for you. Or just use the <a href="http://www.crucial.com/systemscanner/index.aspx">System Scanner</a>.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/">Is 2GB RAM Now The Standard?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memory Is Ultra Cheap. Why Not Add More?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-is-ultra-cheap-why-not-add-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-is-ultra-cheap-why-not-add-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 07:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Faulkner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I upgraded one of our laptops from 1 GB to 2 GB of memory for the whopping cost of $25. The memory was nothing special, just a single 1 GB DDR2 laptop stick. Considering the price of the most common type of memory is so cheap right now, why not double your RAM? [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-is-ultra-cheap-why-not-add-more/">Memory Is Ultra Cheap. Why Not Add More?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week I upgraded one of our laptops from 1 GB to 2 GB of memory for the whopping cost of $25. The memory was nothing special, just a single 1 GB DDR2 laptop stick. Considering the price of the most common type of memory is so cheap right now, why not double your RAM? The cost of putting extra memory in your system is always well spent as it typically increases performance more than any other upgrade and can extend the life of your PC for a while.</p>
<p>If you are not sure what type of memory you need, use a memory selector such as what <a href="http://www.crucial.com/">Crucial</a> or <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Store/Category.aspx?Category=17&amp;name=Memory">NewEgg</a> offer (both of these places are also excellent places to buy your memory).</p>
<p>Unfortunately, if you are using older types of RAM such as PC133 or DDR (1), the prices are not as cheap. If this is the case, check out <a href="http://computers.ebay.com/">Ebay</a> where you can usually pick up new or good as new stuff for quite a bit cheaper than buying it new.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-is-ultra-cheap-why-not-add-more/">Memory Is Ultra Cheap. Why Not Add More?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-is-ultra-cheap-why-not-add-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newegg&#8217;s Memory &#8220;Configurator&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/neweggs-memory-configurator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/neweggs-memory-configurator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 07:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Faulkner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newegg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=6197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have written in the past about how valuable a system memory selector tool is when you are looking to upgrade the amount of RAM in your system. For the most part, you just find the &#8220;type&#8221; of RAM you need and then buy it, of course if you do not know what type you [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/neweggs-memory-configurator/">Newegg&#8217;s Memory &#8220;Configurator&#8221;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have written in the past about how valuable a system memory selector tool is when you are looking to upgrade the amount of RAM in your system. For the most part, you just find the &#8220;type&#8221; of RAM you need and then buy it, of course if you do not know what type you need a system memory selector tool is invaluable.</p>
<p>The other day, I stumbled across <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductConfigurator.aspx?Category=17&amp;name=Memory-Configurator">Newegg&#8217;s &#8220;Memory Configurator&#8221;</a> (not sure if that is even a word) which basically runs a search in their product database for all memory which is a fit for your system. Considering Newegg is, seemingly, the most popular online vendor with this site&#8217;s readers, this makes a great tool.</p>
<p>I have recently placed an order which resulted from use of this tool and plan to use it a lot more in the future.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/neweggs-memory-configurator/">Newegg&#8217;s Memory &#8220;Configurator&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/neweggs-memory-configurator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memory Types</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-types/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-types/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yoman222</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-types/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at some of the different kinds of memory out there.There are several different technologies when it comes to memory.  Here is an overview of these technologies and what they mean to your computer.
ROM
This is read-only memory, memory that can only be read, but cannot be written to. ROM is used in situations where the data must be held permanently. This is due to the [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-types/">Memory Types</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are several different technologies when it comes to memory.  Here is an overview of these technologies and what they mean to your computer.</p>
<h3>ROM</h3>
<p>This is read-only memory, memory that can only be read, but cannot be written to. ROM is used in situations where the data must be held permanently. This is due to the fact that it is non-volatile memory. This means the data is &#8220;hard-wired&#8221; into the ROM chip. You can store the chip forever and the data will always be there. Besides, the data is very secure. The BIOS is stored on ROM because the user cannot disrupt the information.</p>
<p>There are different types of ROM, too:<br />
Programmable ROM(PROM). This is basically a blank ROM chip that can be written to, but only once. It is much like a CD-R drive that burns the data into the CD. Some companies use special machinery to write PROMs for special purposes.<br />
Erasable Programmable ROM (EPROM). This is just like PROM, except that you can erase the ROM by shining a special ultra-violet light into a sensor atop the ROM chip for a certain amount of time. Doing this wipes the data out, allowing it to be rewritten.<br />
Electrically Erasable Programmable ROM (EEPROM). Also called flash BIOS. This ROM can be rewritten through the use of a special software program. Flash BIOS operates this way, allowing users to upgrade their BIOS.</p>
<p>ROM is slower than RAM, which is why some try to shadow it to increase speed.</p>
<h3>RAM</h3>
<p>Random Access Memory (RAM) is what most of us think of when we hear the word memory associated with computers. It is volatile memory, meaning all data is lost when power is turned off. The RAM is used for temporary storage of program data, allowing performance to be optimum.</p>
<p>Like ROM, there are different types of RAM:</p>
<h3>Static RAM (SRAM)</h3>
<p>. This RAM will maintain it&#8217;s data as long as power is provided to the memory chips. It does not need to be re-written periodically. In fact, the only time the data on the memory is refreshed or changed is when an actual write command is executed. SRAM is very fast, but is much more expensive than DRAM. SRAM is often used as cache memory due to its speed.</p>
<p>There are a few types of SRAM:</p>
<h3>Async SRAM</h3>
<p>An older type of SRAM used in many PC&#8217;s for L2 cache. It is asynchronous, meaning that it works independently of the system clock. This means that the CPU found itself waiting for info from the L2 cache.<br />
Sync SRAM. This type of SRAM is synchronous, meaning it is synchronized with the system clock. While this speeds it up, it makes it rather expensive at the same time.<br />
Pipeline Burst SRAM. Commonly used. SRAM requests are pipelined, meaning larger packets of data re sent to the memory at once, and acted on very quickly. This breed of SRAM can operate at bus speeds higher than 66MHz, so is often used.</p>
<h3>Dynamic RAM (DRAM)</h3>
<p>DRAM, unlike SRAM, must be continually re-written in order for it to maintain its data. This is done by placing the memory on a refresh circuit that re-writes the data several hundred time per second. DRAM is used for most system memory because it is cheap and small.</p>
<p>There are several types of DRAM, complicating the memory scene even more:</p>
<h3>Fast Page Mode DRAM (FPM DRAM)</h3>
<p>FPM DRAM is only slightly faster than regular DRAM. Before there was EDO RAM, FPM RAM was the main type used in PC&#8217;s. It is pretty slow stuff, with an access time of 120 ns. It was eventually tweaked to 60 ns, but FPM was still too slow to work on the 66MHz system bus. For this reason, FPM RAM was replaced by EDO RAM. FPM RAM is not much used today due to its slow speed, but is almost universally supported.</p>
<h3>Extended Data Out DRAM (EDO DRAM)</h3>
<p>EDO memory incorporates yet another tweak in the method of access. It allows one access to begin while another is being completed. While this might sound ingenious, the performance increase over FPM DRAM is only around 30%. EDO DRAM must be properly supported by the chipset. EDO RAM comes on a SIMM. EDO RAM cannot operate on a bus speed faster than 66MHz, so, with the increasing use of higher bus speeds, EDO RAM has taken the path of FPM RAM.</p>
<h3>Burst EDO DRAM (BEDO DRAM)</h3>
<p>Original EDO RAM was too slow for the newer systems coming out at the time. Therefore, a new method of memory access had to be developed to speed up the memory. Bursting was the method devised. This means that larger blocks of data were sent to the memory at a time, and each &#8220;block&#8221; of data not only carried the memory address of the immediate page, but info on the next several pages. Therefore, the next few accesses would not experience any delays due to the preceding memory requests. This technology increases EDO RAM speed up to around 10 ns, but it did not give it the ability to operate stably at bus speeds over 66MHz. BEDO RAM was an effort to make EDO RAM compete with SDRAM.</p>
<h3>Synchronous DRAM (SDRAM)</h3>
<p>SDRAM became the new standard after EDO bit the dust. Its speed is synchronous, meaning that it is directly dependent on the clock speed of the entire system. Standard SDRAM can handle higher bus speeds. In theory, it could operate at up to 100MHz, although it was found that many other variable factors went into whether or not it could stabily do so. The actual speed capacity of the module depended on the actual memory chips as well as design factors in the memory PCB itself.</p>
<p>To get around the variability, Intel created the PC100 standard. The PC100 standard ensures compatibility of SDRAM subsystems with Intel&#8217;s 100MHz FSB processors. The new design, production, and test requirements created challenges for semiconductor companies and memory module suppliers. Each PC100 SDRAM module required key attributes to guarantee full compliance, such as the use of 8ns DRAM components (chips) that are capable of operating at 125MHz. This provided a margin of safety in ensuring that that the memory module could run at PC100 speeds. Additionally, SDRAM chips must be used in conjunction with a correctly programmed EEPROM on a properly designed printed circuit board. The shorter the distance the signal needs to travel, the faster it runs. For this reason, there were additional layers of internal circuitry on PC100 modules.</p>
<p>As PC speeds increased, the same problem was encountered for the 133 MHz bus, so the PC133 standard was developed.</p>
<h3>RAMBus DRAM (RDRAM)</h3>
<p>Developed by Rambus, Inc. and endorsed by Intel as the chosen successor to SDRAM. RDRAM narrows the memory bus to 16-bit and runs at up to 800 MHz. Since this narrow bus takes up less space on the board, systems can get more speed by running multiple channels in parallel. Despite the speed, RDRAM has had a tough time taking off in the market because of compatibility and timing issues. Heat is also an issue, but RDRAM has heatsinks to dissipate this. Cost is a major issue with RDRAM, with manufacturers needing to make major facility changes to make it and the product cost to consumers being too high for people to swallow.</p>
<h3>DDR-SDRAM (DDR)</h3>
<p>This type of memory is the natural evolution from SDRAM and most manufacturers prefer this to Rambus because not much needs to be changed to make it. Also, memory makers are free to manufacture it because it is an open standard, whereas they would have to pay license fees to Rambus, Inc. in order make RDRAM. DDR stands for Double Data Rate. DDR shuffles data over the bus over both the rise and fall of the clock cycle, effectively doubling the speed over that of standard SDRAM. Due to its advantages over RDRAM, DDR-SDRAM support was implemented by almost all major chipset manufacturers, and quickly became the new memory standard for the majority of PC&#8217;s. Speeds ranged from 100mhz DDR (with operating speed of 200MHz), or pc1600 DDR-SDRAM, all the way to current rates of 200mhz DDR (with operating speed of 400MHz), or pc3200 DDR-SDRAM. Some memory manufactures produce even faster DDR-SDRAM memory modules which readily appeal to the overclocker crowd.</p>
<h3>DDR-SDRAM 2 (DDR2)</h3>
<p>The latest DDR-SDRAM technology to hit the market for PC&#8217;s has become known simply as DDR-SDRAM 2 or DDR2. It features several advantages over conventional DDR-SDRAM (DDR), with the main one being that in each memory cycle DDR2 now transmits for 4 bits of information from logical (internal) memory to the I/O buffers. standard DDR-SDRAM only transmits 2 bits of information each memory cycle. Because of this, normal DDR-SDRAM requires the internal memory and I/O buffers to both operate at 200MHz to reach a total external operating speed of 400MHz. Due to DDR2&#8217;s ability to transmit twice as many bits per cycle from logical (internal) memory to the I/O buffers (this technology is formally known as 4 bit prefetch), the internal memory speed can actually run at 100MHz instead of 200MHz, and the total external operating speed will still be 400MHz. Mainly what all this comes down to is that DDR-SDRAM 2 will be able to operate at higher total operating frequencies thanks to its 4 bit prefetch technology (e.g. a 200mhz internal memory speed would yield a total external operating speed of 800mhz!) than DDR-SDRAM. Currently, this is the memory standard on most new motherboards.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-types/">Memory Types</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-types/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memory Considerations</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-considerations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-considerations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2002 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Risley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1928720694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at a few memory cinsiderations: Memory speed, CAS Latency, and SPDComputer memory is one of those areas that causes quite a bit of unnecessary confusion for newbies. Memory is a fairly straight-forward thing and, for the most part, there is not a whole lot to consider. There are, though, a few terms and concepts that are thrown around, and I will seek to explain them [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-considerations/">Memory Considerations</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><P>Computer memory is one of those areas that causes quite a bit of unnecessary confusion for newbies. Memory is a fairly straight-forward thing and, for the most part, there is not a whole lot to consider. There are, though, a few terms and concepts that are thrown around, and I will seek to explain them here.<br />
<P><STRONG>Memory Speed</STRONG><br />
<P>There are various specs used to specify the speed of a memory module. Older memory types have their speeds measured in terms of access time, or the time it takes to pull a piece of data from memory and get it onto the memory bus. This is usually measured it terms of nanoseconds (ns). A typical access time would be 50-60 ns. Beginning with SDRAM, speed was measured in terms of cycle time, or the minimum amount of time between memory accesses. Typical cycle times for SDRAM are 12, 10 and 8 ns, with faster speeds also seen.<br />
<P>A wait state is a command which orders the CPU to pause for one clock cycle in order to wait for the memory to do something. It is basically a waste of time, because the processor is just sitting there and doing nothing. Older systems sometimes used 2 or 3 wait states, while later ones used only 1. A zero wait state is best, because that means the processor is not waiting around for the slower memory. The concept of wait state was devised to allow systems to support older memory types. Most systems that use wait states (except the really old ones) have the wait state setting controlled in the motherboard&#8217;s CMOS, usually in the <EM>advanced settings</EM> section.<br />
<P>SDRAM is synchronous, meaning it is tied into the bus speed of the system. This means that the memory must be fast enough to work on the system you intend to put it on. SDRAM does not use wait states for this reason. The memory, then, must be fast enough for the system, taking slack into account. It is really this reason why SDRAM was created in the first place: to make memory that could keep up with the system. For older systems, EDO RAM does just fine. At the 66MHz speed, EDO was a dream, as that is what it was really designed for. It was soon found that EDO RAM worked just fine at even higher speeds, such as 75MHz or 83MHz. SDRAM was designed mainly to operate with stability at bus speeds such as 100MHz or 133MHz. A majority of users today are making decisions between PC-100 and PC-133 memory. In short, PC-100 is designed for a 100MHz bus speed while, obviously, PC-133 is designed for the 133MHz bus speed. Both modules can typically be ran faster than this in overclocking situations, but this can lead to unstability of the PC. So, these ratings are considered the &#8220;stable&#8221; rating, or the speed at which the memory can run without any stability concerns.<br />
<P><STRONG>Determining Memory Speed</STRONG><br />
<P>It can prove challenging to determine the speed of a memory module simply by looking at it. Unless there is a sticker of some sort on it from the distributor, you are pretty much stuck with cross-referencing part numbers with catalogs to determine just how fast a module is supposed to be. Sometimes, though, you can determine the access time or cycle time (depending on the memory types) of a module by looking at the numbers on it. For example, on EDO memory, adding a -6 or a -7 to the end of the part number usually means 60ns and 70 ns access times respectively. Wiuth SDRAM, a -10 means 10ns cycle time.<br />
<P>Nanosecond were used before the PC100 standard was defined. With the standard, you pretty much knew what you were getting with a particular spec, so tracking the actual cycle times was irrelevant.<br />
<P><STRONG>CAS Latency</STRONG><br />
<P>CAS Latency is a measure of latency of a memory chip. CAS stands for Column Access Select. Basically, it is a measure of how long it takes from when an initial READ command is sent to memory to when the first piece of the resulting data is output. The measurement is done in clock cycles, so a CAS Latency of x means that a READ command sent to memory at clock cycle c will result in data output starting at clock cycle c + x.<br />
<P>CAS Latency is very closely tied with the system bus speed you are using. On faster bus speeds, data is flying by the memory at a faster rate. This pushes the memory even harder. But, as mentioned above, all memory chips have an access time, even SDRAM. But, that &#8220;S&#8221; in SDRAM means that is is synchronous, running at the speed of the system bus. So, regardless of the access time of the memory, the bus pushes even harder at high bus speeds. So, at higher bus speeds, it may be necessary to make use of wait states anyway in order to make the memory is capable of operating. But, wait states, on SDRAM, are done in the RAM itself rather than actually having the CPU waiting around. So, it may be necessary to increase the CAS latency on higher bus speeds in order to maintain system stability. This will control how often the CPU will deliver a command to make the memory wait the specified number of clock cycles for the memory to begin output.<br />
<P>In short, CAS3 is the standard latency for memory modules, because it is cheaper to manufacture. If the CAS spec is not mentioned or defined, it is probably CAS3. CAS2, though, is a faster memory module. The latency is less, and this leads to faster application speeds. As you might expect, such memory is typically more expensive. If you are using CAS2 memory and it is enabled as such in the BIOS, you might notice a bit of a speed increase. Even with&nbsp;CAS2 memory, though, it could&nbsp;be necessary to choose CAS3 in your CMOS in order to make the memory stable in a higher bus-speed compter.&nbsp;<br />
<P><B><I>2-clock vs. 4-Clock</I></B><br />
<P>Two types of SDRAMs are the 2-clock and the 4-clock. Structurally, they are the same, but they are accessed differently. A 2-clock SDRAM module is set up so that each clock cycle accesses two chips on the module. A 4-clock SDRAM setup accesses 4 chips per clock cycle. To choose what kind to get, you must look into the motherboard&#8217;s documentation. 4-clock modules seem to be the popular choice.<br />
<P><I><B>Serial Presence Detect</B></I><br />
<P>Some SDRAM modules have a special EEPROM chip on it that holds information about the SDRAM module, such as speed settings. The motherboard then queries this chip for info and makes changes in the settings to work with the SDRAM. Basically, this allows the SDRAM module and the chipset to communicate, making the SDRAM more reliable on a larger number of motherboards. Some motherboards require this feature. You will have to look at the manual, once again. If your board requires it, make sure you have it, because SDRAM without this won&#8217;t work.<br />
<P>When choosing SDRAM for your computer, you need to know your motherboard and get exactly the type it requires.</P></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-considerations/">Memory Considerations</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-considerations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memory Matchup</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-matchup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-matchup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2001 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tiretool</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1503035535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A comparison of memory modules from Crucial and Mushkin. Tiretool puts them through the paces to see if they live up to their claims.Price, quality, and quantity&#8230; three very important factors that guide you in the selection of your computer system\&#8217;s physical memory. The \&#8221;price\&#8221; part is now at an all time low. Just checking at www.pricewatch.com, I found a 256 meg stick of generic memory for all of $16.00. You can\&#8217;t get a better \&#8221;bang-for-your-buck\&#8221; product that [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-matchup/">Memory Matchup</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><P>Price, quality, and quantity&#8230; three very important factors that guide you in the selection of your computer system\&#8217;s physical memory. The \&#8221;price\&#8221; part is now at an all time low. Just checking at <A href=\"http://www.pricewatch.com/\">www.pricewatch.com</A>, I found a 256 meg stick of generic memory for all of $16.00. You can\&#8217;t get a better \&#8221;bang-for-your-buck\&#8221; product that will provide your computer with as much of a dramatic increase in system performance as an upgrade in RAM will. Now the big question&#8230; Who to buy from? </P><br />
<P>Two highly recognized names come to mind -&nbsp; Crucial and Mushkin.</P><br />
<P><A href=\"http://www.pcmech.com/images/memory.jpg\">Click to see Picture of Modules</A></P><br />
<P>Crucial has long been regarded as&nbsp;\&#8221;the memory experts\&#8221;. &nbsp;It\&#8217;s hard to dispute this, as they are the largest DRAM manufacturer in America and one of the top three in the world. A division of Micron, Crucial offers over 73,000 upgrades for more than 13,000 different computers. </P><br />
<P>Mushkin, on the other hand has always been a favorite for overclockers and their memory needs. Mushkin hand picks their memory chips and selects only the very best to put on their modules so that you&nbsp;are guaranteed to get the performance printed on the module -&nbsp;and then some. Mushkin is focused more on quality than&nbsp;quantity.&nbsp; It is reflected in the high performance of their memory modules.</P><br />
<P>This review compares modules from both companies, testing their performance, tolerances, and&nbsp;price differences, ultimately showing that you get what you pay for.</P></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-matchup/">Memory Matchup</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-matchup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freeing Up Conventional Memory</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/freeing-up-conventional-memory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/freeing-up-conventional-memory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Risley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">857581517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An outline of some ways to free up conventional memory on older systems such as Windows 3.x.There are a number of ways you can increase the amount of conventional memory available to you. Conventional memory is that first 640 KB of memory which all programs hog for. Since it is in such demand, keeping it optimized and available is important.
Many of these actions involve making changes to the CONFIG.SYS file. Remember, [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/freeing-up-conventional-memory/">Freeing Up Conventional Memory</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a number of ways you can increase the amount of conventional memory available to you. Conventional memory is that first 640 KB of memory which all programs hog for. Since it is in such demand, keeping it optimized and available is important.<br />
<P>Many of these actions involve making changes to the CONFIG.SYS file. Remember, you want to keep a backup of the last CONFIG.SYS that your system last worked correctly with. So, backup yours before making any of these changes. Most name their backup copy CONFIG.BAK.<br />
<P>Here are some things you could try:<br />
<UL><br />
<LI>Thin out your AUTOEXEC.BAT and CONFIG.SYS file. Many times these files call up programs that are simply not needed or not there. These lines can be removed. Better yet, just add REM to the beginning of the line you want to take out. This makes it a \&#8221;remark\&#8221; and the computer will not execute that line.<br />
<LI>Use the HIMEM.SYS file. At the top of CONFIG.SYS, add two lines: \&#8221;DEVICE=C:WINDOWSHIMEM.SYS\&#8221; and \&#8221;DOS=HIGH,UMB\&#8221;. This will call up HIMEM.SYS, a program that loads DOS into high memory, or that first 64K of memory, that all DOS programs fight over.<br />
<LI>Use EMM386.SYS. This program enables DOS to load drivers and other automatically loaded programs into the upper memory while conserving conventional memory. To use it, add the following to CONFIG.SYS right after the HIMEM.SYS line: \&#8221;DEVICE=C:WINDOWSEMM386.EXE\&#8221;. There are a couple parameters you should add to this line. To disable expanded memory, which hardly anybody needs, add \&#8221;NOEMS\&#8221; to disable the EMS buffer. To disable the Monochrome Video Area, add \&#8221;I=B000-B7FF\&#8221;. This disables the monochrome area that is used by the really old DOS programs that were monochrome. Today, with everything in color, this is just a waste of 32K of conventional memory.<br />
<LI>With HIMEM.SYS and EMM386.SYS working, it gives you the ability to move drivers and programs that would usually reside in conventional memory up to the upper memory. To do this, you simply add HIGH to the lines loading up the drivers. For example, in the CONFIG.SYS file, a driver will be loaded by \&#8221;DEVICE=\&#8221;. To load this driver into upper memory, you call it up by \&#8221;DEVICEHIGH=\&#8221;. In AUTOEXEC.BAT, you can place a program in upper memory by adding \&#8221;LOADHIGH\&#8221; to the line that runs the program. Most drivers can be moved to upper memory, including CD-ROM, mouse, etc. </LI></UL><br />
<P>Taking this into account, a typical CONFIG.SYS may look something like this:<br />
<P>DEVICE=C:WINDOWSHIMEM.SYS<BR>DEVICE=C:WINDOWSEMM386.EXE NOEMS<BR>I=B000-B7FF<br />
<P>DEVICEHIGH={Your System Drivers Go Here} <BR>DOS=HIGH,UMB<BR>FILES=100 <BR>BUFFERS=40 <BR>BREAK=ON <BR>LASTDRIVE=Z<br />
<P>I\&#8217;ll just make a note here that this page pretty much refers to Windows 3.x users. Windows 3.x still depends on the conventional memory. Windows 95 has the ability to take full advantage of all of the system memory, so these tips don\&#8217;t have much impact.</P></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/freeing-up-conventional-memory/">Freeing Up Conventional Memory</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/freeing-up-conventional-memory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memory Packaging</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-packaging/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-packaging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Risley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">1556113610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at the actual memory module.The packaging is simply the entire makeup of a unit of memory,&#160;such as the SIMM or DIMM.&#160;Since the memory chips themselves are way too small, they must be combined and put onto a medium that can be worked with and added to a system. So, designers took the memory chips, placed them on a small [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-packaging/">Memory Packaging</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><P>The packaging is simply the entire makeup of a unit of memory,&nbsp;such as the SIMM or DIMM.&nbsp;Since the memory chips themselves are way too small, they must be combined and put onto a medium that can be worked with and added to a system. So, designers took the memory chips, placed them on a small fiberglass card, and created the memory module. </P><br />
<P>There are several different package styles which one may see for memory:</P><br />
<UL><br />
<LI><STRONG>DIP (Dual In-Line Package)</STRONG> &#8211; This is the old classic &#8220;chip&#8221; package of memory modules, the kind with small pins undrneath that are plugged into pin sockets. While this design led to the ability to remove as required, it also led to the issue of broken memory pins. This type of package is only seen on old systems (such as those in the 286 era and before) and old video cards.</LI><br />
<LI><STRONG>SOJ (Small-Outline &#8220;J&#8221; lead)</STRONG> &#8211; This is a more modern type of package often found on memory SIMMs or sometimes with BIOS chips. It is similar to the DIP package, but is designed for surface mounting by having the leads protrude from the side of the package, but bent down under the package in the shape of a &#8220;j&#8221;. </LI><br />
<LI><STRONG>TSOP (Thin, Small-Outline Package)</STRONG> &#8211; This is also a surface mounting package, but it requires a very small space, and is thus used on PCMCIA cards, as well as in notebooks and on some video cards.</LI><br />
<LI><STRONG>BGA (Ball Grid Array)</STRONG> &#8211; A newer packaging method in which the chips are attached using small balls of solder underneath the chip. The advantage to the manufacrturer is that they are cheaper to make, allow more capacity, allow better heat dissipation and better electrical performance. There have been various variations of this packaging style: Fine-BGA, Tiny-BGA, etc. , all various advancements off of the BGA standard. This type of package is most common today in heavily-used memory modules, including Rambus.</LI></UL><br />
<P>Finally, engineers put the chips on SIMMs, or Single Inline Memory Modules, or DIMMs, Double Inline Memory Modules. SIMMs use a 32-bit memory bus whereas DIMMs use a 64-bit&nbsp;memory bus. These cards are placed in a socket on the motherboard, like a card in a slot, then latched in. This design eliminated problems of the past, and made upgrading memory a breeze due to providing standardization which other manufacturers could rely on.<br />
<P><B>SIMMs</B><br />
<P>SIMMs come in two sizes, 30-pin and 72-pin. The 30 pin SIMMs usually came with small amounts of memory (smaller than 8MB). They are not used now, being mainly used in earlier 486&#8217;s and older machines. The 72-pin SIMMs were much more popular, and were used on many motherboards until SDRAM came into the picture. Although you will occasionally see 72-pin SIMMS still in use, it is usually only if you are opening up an old system.<br />
<P align=center><IMG height=95 src="http://www.pcmech.com/pics/simm30.gif" width=345 border=0></P><br />
<P align=center><IMG height=113 src="http://www.pcmech.com/pics/simm72.gif" width=415 border=0></P><br />
<P>For pinout info: see <A href="http://www.pcmech.com/simm30-pinout.htm">30-pin pinout</A> or <A href="http://www.pcmech.com/simm72-pinout.htm">72-pin pinout</A>.<br />
<P>SIMMs come in both single sided and double sided designs. This refers to whether the SIMM has memory chips on one side of the SIMM or both. Usually, 1, 4, and 16MB SIMMs are single sided. Other sizes are double sided. Some double sided SIMMs are actually two single sided SIMMS back to back, where they are wired together within the fiberglass module. These designs operate a little different electrically, explaining why some boards only use SIMMs of certain sizes. </P></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.pcmech.com">PCMech</a>. Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On And Live The Digital Lifestyle.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-packaging/">Memory Packaging</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcmech.com/article/memory-packaging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
