<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Comparison Chart For Older CPU&#8217;s</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/comparison-chart-for-older-cpus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/comparison-chart-for-older-cpus/</link> <description>Tech Powered Life... Simplified</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 03:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator> <item><title>By: John Klos</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/comparison-chart-for-older-cpus/comment-page-1/#comment-32226</link> <dc:creator>John Klos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:40:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10159#comment-32226</guid> <description>&quot;almost any older CPU you can think of &quot; isn&#039;t quite accurate. The PassMark site only covers x86 and x86-64 CPUs, which means there are TONS of older CPUs I can think of which aren&#039;t on there.In the past, there were so many factors in benchmarking (OS, toolchain, background use) that made comparisons difficult. Nowadays, not only are previously highly expensive systems available on eBay for next to nothing, but we can run the same OS with the same toolchain on most of them (NetBSD, and in some instances, GNU/Linux) and compare in a more consistent way.For instance, a 66 MHz m68060 Amiga blows away a 133 MHz SH3 Jornada 690... Hmmm... not too surprising. How about a 55 MHz KA46 VAXstation 4000/60 versus a 40 MHz m68040 Mac Quadra?Comparing an AMD Athlon to a Pentium III? Been there, done that. But SPARC versus PowerPC versus VAX versus MIPS versus StrongARM versus m68k versus SH3 / SH4 versus Alpha versus x86 of the time... interesting...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;almost any older CPU you can think of &#8221; isn&#8217;t quite accurate. The PassMark site only covers x86 and x86-64 CPUs, which means there are TONS of older CPUs I can think of which aren&#8217;t on there.</p><p>In the past, there were so many factors in benchmarking (OS, toolchain, background use) that made comparisons difficult. Nowadays, not only are previously highly expensive systems available on eBay for next to nothing, but we can run the same OS with the same toolchain on most of them (NetBSD, and in some instances, GNU/Linux) and compare in a more consistent way.</p><p>For instance, a 66 MHz m68060 Amiga blows away a 133 MHz SH3 Jornada 690&#8230; Hmmm&#8230; not too surprising. How about a 55 MHz KA46 VAXstation 4000/60 versus a 40 MHz m68040 Mac Quadra?</p><p>Comparing an AMD Athlon to a Pentium III? Been there, done that. But SPARC versus PowerPC versus VAX versus MIPS versus StrongARM versus m68k versus SH3 / SH4 versus Alpha versus x86 of the time&#8230; interesting&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 40/49 queries in 0.015 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.pcmech.com @ 2013-02-12 08:20:53 --