<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ditch The Slack [Camcorders]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/ditch-the-slack-camcorders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/ditch-the-slack-camcorders/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:07:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/ditch-the-slack-camcorders/comment-page-1/#comment-21368</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/ditch-the-slack-camcorders/#comment-21368</guid>
		<description>Rich, doesn&#039;t MiniDV give you an overall better quality picture though? I read somewhere that the problem with the flash/HDD camcorders (HDD is actually my preference also) is that the compression is much greater than the MiniDV&#039;s. Do you think it&#039;s a noticeable difference, if any?

I&#039;m in the research stage myself, and really want to get a hi-def HDD camera, but hearing/reading about some compression &quot;issues&quot; that you don&#039;t get w/ MiniDV.... *confused*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich, doesn&#8217;t MiniDV give you an overall better quality picture though? I read somewhere that the problem with the flash/HDD camcorders (HDD is actually my preference also) is that the compression is much greater than the MiniDV&#8217;s. Do you think it&#8217;s a noticeable difference, if any?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in the research stage myself, and really want to get a hi-def HDD camera, but hearing/reading about some compression &#8220;issues&#8221; that you don&#8217;t get w/ MiniDV&#8230;. *confused*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Cliff</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/ditch-the-slack-camcorders/comment-page-1/#comment-20943</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Cliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/ditch-the-slack-camcorders/#comment-20943</guid>
		<description>I agree that it will be nice to upgrade to a HDD camera when our mini-dv finally gives in.  It truly is amazing how much storage they are cramming into the cameras these days.

Now if the optics were just a bit better life would be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it will be nice to upgrade to a HDD camera when our mini-dv finally gives in.  It truly is amazing how much storage they are cramming into the cameras these days.</p>
<p>Now if the optics were just a bit better life would be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
