<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Do You Pay Fully Featured Programs Or Go With A Lesser Freebie?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/do-you-pay-fully-featured-programs-or-go-with-a-lesser-freebie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/do-you-pay-fully-featured-programs-or-go-with-a-lesser-freebie/</link> <description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: DataTamer</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/do-you-pay-fully-featured-programs-or-go-with-a-lesser-freebie/comment-page-1/#comment-34312</link> <dc:creator>DataTamer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:22:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10481#comment-34312</guid> <description>I disagree with all that say why pay for it when you can get it for free.  If something is a one-shot I will use or recommend a free solution.  However, if the software addresses a need that will be used over time then I always recommend a paid solution, even paying for donationware.  Why?  The reasoning is quite simple.  Here in the US there is a profit motive.  I feel that if the individual is paid, he will continue working on the program making it better.  If he is doing it as a hobby, there is a lesser chance that the product will be improved.  The &quot;help&quot; is not as important to me as continually improving the product.  For example, I would probably get almost as much information from PcMech if I just used their &quot;free subscription&quot;, however I opted for the paid subscription.  Why?  Because I felt that it would provide an incentive for David and gang to provide a better newsletter.  I believe that I was right as I have seen the newsletter evolve.  If they weren&#039;t paid, what would be their reason to continually improve and publish this newsletter?  The same is true of software writers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with all that say why pay for it when you can get it for free.  If something is a one-shot I will use or recommend a free solution.  However, if the software addresses a need that will be used over time then I always recommend a paid solution, even paying for donationware.  Why?  The reasoning is quite simple.  Here in the US there is a profit motive.  I feel that if the individual is paid, he will continue working on the program making it better.  If he is doing it as a hobby, there is a lesser chance that the product will be improved.  The &#8220;help&#8221; is not as important to me as continually improving the product.  For example, I would probably get almost as much information from PcMech if I just used their &#8220;free subscription&#8221;, however I opted for the paid subscription.  Why?  Because I felt that it would provide an incentive for David and gang to provide a better newsletter.  I believe that I was right as I have seen the newsletter evolve.  If they weren&#8217;t paid, what would be their reason to continually improve and publish this newsletter?  The same is true of software writers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: odd1</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/do-you-pay-fully-featured-programs-or-go-with-a-lesser-freebie/comment-page-1/#comment-34306</link> <dc:creator>odd1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:53:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10481#comment-34306</guid> <description>Don&#039;t forget to donate to those Open Source creators.  Free programs that I have found to be great time savers have received donations from me.  I appreciate free but I also know the creator needs to eat.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget to donate to those Open Source creators.  Free programs that I have found to be great time savers have received donations from me.  I appreciate free but I also know the creator needs to eat.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sefcug</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/do-you-pay-fully-featured-programs-or-go-with-a-lesser-freebie/comment-page-1/#comment-34258</link> <dc:creator>sefcug</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:13:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10481#comment-34258</guid> <description>I agree Windows and MS Office for business use, but I would go for openoffice.org for personal use due to costs.
In either case, I tend to use the free utilities whenever possible, and single purpose rather than suite.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Windows and MS Office for business use, but I would go for openoffice.org for personal use due to costs.<br
/> In either case, I tend to use the free utilities whenever possible, and single purpose rather than suite.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: joshp1</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/do-you-pay-fully-featured-programs-or-go-with-a-lesser-freebie/comment-page-1/#comment-34243</link> <dc:creator>joshp1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:07:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10481#comment-34243</guid> <description>why pay when you can get it for free and sometimes its even better but if your going free go open source closed source freeware is usally done by one person or one team while open source is done by nearly everyone who uses it.
ps i prefor linux over windows any day</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why pay when you can get it for free and sometimes its even better but if your going free go open source closed source freeware is usally done by one person or one team while open source is done by nearly everyone who uses it.<br
/> ps i prefor linux over windows any day</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David K.</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/do-you-pay-fully-featured-programs-or-go-with-a-lesser-freebie/comment-page-1/#comment-34238</link> <dc:creator>David K.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:51:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10481#comment-34238</guid> <description>Agree with your assessment.  And on the whole, tech support has become so bad lately, if that&#039;s what you&#039;re paying for it&#039;s sure not worth the money.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with your assessment.  And on the whole, tech support has become so bad lately, if that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re paying for it&#8217;s sure not worth the money.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Duncan</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/do-you-pay-fully-featured-programs-or-go-with-a-lesser-freebie/comment-page-1/#comment-34235</link> <dc:creator>David Duncan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:51:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10481#comment-34235</guid> <description>I try lots of free apps and regularly use some - depends on what computer I&#039;m building and for whom. On my own systems I usually pay for &quot;system&quot; programs like AV or defrag and some of the video manipulation apps... the quality and support is generally better.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I try lots of free apps and regularly use some &#8211; depends on what computer I&#8217;m building and for whom. On my own systems I usually pay for &#8220;system&#8221; programs like AV or defrag and some of the video manipulation apps&#8230; the quality and support is generally better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: George Peterson</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/do-you-pay-fully-featured-programs-or-go-with-a-lesser-freebie/comment-page-1/#comment-34220</link> <dc:creator>George Peterson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:22:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10481#comment-34220</guid> <description>I will never pay for software when free alternatives are available.You should also try SSuite Office for a free office suite. They have a whole range of office suites that are free for download.Their software also don&#039;t need to run on Java or .NET, so it makes the software very small and efficient.http://www.ssuitesoft.com/index.htm</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will never pay for software when free alternatives are available.</p><p>You should also try SSuite Office for a free office suite. They have a whole range of office suites that are free for download.</p><p>Their software also don&#8217;t need to run on Java or .NET, so it makes the software very small and efficient.</p><p><a
href="http://www.ssuitesoft.com/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ssuitesoft.com/index.htm</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason Faulkner</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/do-you-pay-fully-featured-programs-or-go-with-a-lesser-freebie/comment-page-1/#comment-34211</link> <dc:creator>Jason Faulkner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:24:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10481#comment-34211</guid> <description>Not everyone is open to change. Besides that, MS Office does a lot that OpenOffice doesn&#039;t (Sharepoint integrations, OBA&#039;s, etc.).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not everyone is open to change. Besides that, MS Office does a lot that OpenOffice doesn&#8217;t (Sharepoint integrations, OBA&#8217;s, etc.).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: eli</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/do-you-pay-fully-featured-programs-or-go-with-a-lesser-freebie/comment-page-1/#comment-34197</link> <dc:creator>eli</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:36:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10481#comment-34197</guid> <description>Since I switched to linux, I haven&#039;t payed for anything. I&#039;ve found exactly what I need for free. Even when I&#039;ve had to search for something to replace a windows app I&#039;ve been happy with the results. I can&#039;t see ever paying for software again.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I switched to linux, I haven&#8217;t payed for anything. I&#8217;ve found exactly what I need for free. Even when I&#8217;ve had to search for something to replace a windows app I&#8217;ve been happy with the results. I can&#8217;t see ever paying for software again.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Floyd</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/do-you-pay-fully-featured-programs-or-go-with-a-lesser-freebie/comment-page-1/#comment-34189</link> <dc:creator>Floyd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:14:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10481#comment-34189</guid> <description>Why do you make those exceptions for business use?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you make those exceptions for business use?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 34/52 queries in 0.044 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.pcmech.com @ 2012-02-15 14:00:44 -->
