FCC Says "Whoa, There!" Concerning Universal Service Fund

Almost everyone has a wireless phone. And sure enough you’ve probably seen that “Universal Service Fund” (or something similar to that) on your bill. You’ve probably thought to yourself What IS that charge for?

The USF was created in 1997 by the FCC in order to meet the goals of Universal Service as outlined in the Telecommunications Act of 1996. You can read more about USF here. Is it easy to understand? Not really. It’s supposed to protect the public interest (more on that in a moment.)

A subsidy program concerning rural wireless phone coverage was capped in a 3-2 vote recently. What does this mean? It doesn’t mean you’ll lose any existing service if you’re in a rural region. What it does mean is that the cap was put in place so that funds can be examined to make sure they’re being spent correctly.

Congress is going to re-work the USF into something a bit more modern-day because in all honesty it’s seriously dated.

USF is supposed to be used so that everyone everywhere can have wireless telecommunications available to them in the US. This is currently not the case. Granted, a whopping 80% of the US subscribes to some type of wireless phone service, but 20% is still a huge chunk left out. That 20% literally can’t subscribe because the coverage is nonexistent wherever they are.

Hopefully with the re-worked USF will direct cash where it’s needed, get the towers in place and the network expanded like it’s supposed to be.

There are times when the FCC has to step in and smack around the wireless carriers every so often to make sure they’re spending money correctly. This is one of those times.

You can expect better coverage in “dead” areas in the next few years once the USF is re-done and the cap lifted. This should not take long to complete.

[Source: c|net Tech News Blog]

Free eBook!

Like what you read?

If so, please join over 28,000 people who receive our exclusive weekly newsletter and computer tips, and get FREE COPIES of 5 eBooks we created, as our gift to you for subscribing. Just enter your name and email below:

Post A Comment Using Facebook

  • http://none David M

    Dead areas are not cost effective. That’s why they are dead areas. If the area you are in is dead then drive 10 minutes. Get rid of the fee altogether.

  • http://none David M

    …It makes no sense to put spend the money to place and to power up a cell tower out in the boonies if it hardly ever gets used.

  • Fishy

    But then you would withhold the people of the countryside the liberty to freely choose where they want to live.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Alerts

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of PCMECH readers to notify them of new posts. This email is just a short, plain email with titles and links to our latest posts. You can unsubscribe from this service at any time.

You can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Newsletter

Running for over 6 years, the PCMECH weekly newsletter helps you keep tabs on the world of tech. Each issue includes news bits, an article, an exclusive rant as well as a download of the week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 28,000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other option) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: