http://www.pcmech.com/article/firefox-302-released/ Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:08 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://www.pcmech.com/article/firefox-302-released/comment-page-1/#comment-15062 Drew Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:00:56 +0000 http://www.pcmech.com/article/firefox-302-released/#comment-15062 I'm running an Intel Quad Core processor with 6Gb RAM so I had a bit of an issue finding any noticeable difference in memory usage. I'm all for a good FF update regardless though! :) Thanks for the heads up Rich. I’m running an Intel Quad Core processor with 6Gb RAM so I had a bit of an issue finding any noticeable difference in memory usage. I’m all for a good FF update regardless though!
Thanks for the heads up Rich.

]]> http://www.pcmech.com/article/firefox-302-released/comment-page-1/#comment-15039 Sharron (kkomp) Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:27:44 +0000 http://www.pcmech.com/article/firefox-302-released/#comment-15039 Actually it does appear that 3.02 seems to use around 90KB less RAM from initial findings, at least on this computer (AMD Athlon 64x2, 2GB RAM, ... blah.). I'll have to verify that over the next few days, but it seems to have fixed something anyway. Actually it does appear that 3.02 seems to use around 90KB less RAM from initial findings, at least on this computer (AMD Athlon 64×2, 2GB RAM, … blah.). I’ll have to verify that over the next few days, but it seems to have fixed something anyway.

]]>