<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google On Board With IPv6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/google-on-board-with-ipv6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/google-on-board-with-ipv6/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/google-on-board-with-ipv6/comment-page-1/#comment-10316</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/google-on-board-with-ipv6/#comment-10316</guid>
		<description>Rich,

I have to disagree with your answer to &quot;Do you have to prepare for IPv6 now?&quot;.  You state &quot;No. But in 2010, yes.&quot;.

It&#039;s NOW that enterprise networks and end users should be enabling IPv6, not in 2010.  As the support for IPv6 has matured (Yes - Vista, Server 2008, Linux and Mac OS X all come IPv6 enabled) end users can experiment with IPv6 now vs. being caught off guard in two years.  Even a simple Windows XP box can be enabled with an &quot;ipv6 install&quot; command at the cmd prompt.

Here at Hurricane Electric, we have just published a letter to our customer-base saying exactly that.  Get prepared now; don&#039;t wait.  A copy can be found at: http://he.net/news/Hurricane_Electric_IPv6_Update_April_2008.pdf and takes the approach that now vs. later is better.

Finally, your point about routers and support for IPv6 is a little too generic.  Even a five-year-old Cisco 36xx router I recently looked at was fully capable of running IPv6 routing at an end-point.  It&#039;s even capable of terminating an IPv6 tunnel.  Sometimes that old hardware can surprise you!

Enjoy,

Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich,</p>
<p>I have to disagree with your answer to &#8220;Do you have to prepare for IPv6 now?&#8221;.  You state &#8220;No. But in 2010, yes.&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s NOW that enterprise networks and end users should be enabling IPv6, not in 2010.  As the support for IPv6 has matured (Yes &#8211; Vista, Server 2008, Linux and Mac OS X all come IPv6 enabled) end users can experiment with IPv6 now vs. being caught off guard in two years.  Even a simple Windows XP box can be enabled with an &#8220;ipv6 install&#8221; command at the cmd prompt.</p>
<p>Here at Hurricane Electric, we have just published a letter to our customer-base saying exactly that.  Get prepared now; don&#8217;t wait.  A copy can be found at: <a href="http://he.net/news/Hurricane_Electric_IPv6_Update_April_2008.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://he.net/news/Hurricane_Electric_IPv6_Update_April_2008.pdf</a> and takes the approach that now vs. later is better.</p>
<p>Finally, your point about routers and support for IPv6 is a little too generic.  Even a five-year-old Cisco 36xx router I recently looked at was fully capable of running IPv6 routing at an end-point.  It&#8217;s even capable of terminating an IPv6 tunnel.  Sometimes that old hardware can surprise you!</p>
<p>Enjoy,</p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
