<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Google On Board With IPv6</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/google-on-board-with-ipv6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/google-on-board-with-ipv6/</link> <description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Martin Levy</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/google-on-board-with-ipv6/comment-page-1/#comment-10316</link> <dc:creator>Martin Levy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:02:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/google-on-board-with-ipv6/#comment-10316</guid> <description>Rich,I have to disagree with your answer to &quot;Do you have to prepare for IPv6 now?&quot;.  You state &quot;No. But in 2010, yes.&quot;.It&#039;s NOW that enterprise networks and end users should be enabling IPv6, not in 2010.  As the support for IPv6 has matured (Yes - Vista, Server 2008, Linux and Mac OS X all come IPv6 enabled) end users can experiment with IPv6 now vs. being caught off guard in two years.  Even a simple Windows XP box can be enabled with an &quot;ipv6 install&quot; command at the cmd prompt.Here at Hurricane Electric, we have just published a letter to our customer-base saying exactly that.  Get prepared now; don&#039;t wait.  A copy can be found at: http://he.net/news/Hurricane_Electric_IPv6_Update_April_2008.pdf and takes the approach that now vs. later is better.Finally, your point about routers and support for IPv6 is a little too generic.  Even a five-year-old Cisco 36xx router I recently looked at was fully capable of running IPv6 routing at an end-point.  It&#039;s even capable of terminating an IPv6 tunnel.  Sometimes that old hardware can surprise you!Enjoy,Martin</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich,</p><p>I have to disagree with your answer to &#8220;Do you have to prepare for IPv6 now?&#8221;.  You state &#8220;No. But in 2010, yes.&#8221;.</p><p>It&#8217;s NOW that enterprise networks and end users should be enabling IPv6, not in 2010.  As the support for IPv6 has matured (Yes &#8211; Vista, Server 2008, Linux and Mac OS X all come IPv6 enabled) end users can experiment with IPv6 now vs. being caught off guard in two years.  Even a simple Windows XP box can be enabled with an &#8220;ipv6 install&#8221; command at the cmd prompt.</p><p>Here at Hurricane Electric, we have just published a letter to our customer-base saying exactly that.  Get prepared now; don&#8217;t wait.  A copy can be found at: <a
href="http://he.net/news/Hurricane_Electric_IPv6_Update_April_2008.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://he.net/news/Hurricane_Electric_IPv6_Update_April_2008.pdf</a> and takes the approach that now vs. later is better.</p><p>Finally, your point about routers and support for IPv6 is a little too generic.  Even a five-year-old Cisco 36xx router I recently looked at was fully capable of running IPv6 routing at an end-point.  It&#8217;s even capable of terminating an IPv6 tunnel.  Sometimes that old hardware can surprise you!</p><p>Enjoy,</p><p>Martin</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 33/42 queries in 0.014 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.pcmech.com @ 2012-02-15 09:56:18 -->
