<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: How Spammers Harvest Your Email</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/how-spammer-harvest-your-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/how-spammer-harvest-your-email/</link> <description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Chih-Cherng</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/how-spammer-harvest-your-email/comment-page-1/#comment-38177</link> <dc:creator>Chih-Cherng</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:15:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10088#comment-38177</guid> <description>I&#039;m interested in this problem, too.  Where can I download the 2 papers mentioned in the &quot;Catching Spammers in the Act&quot; article?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested in this problem, too.  Where can I download the 2 papers mentioned in the &#8220;Catching Spammers in the Act&#8221; article?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sea Coast</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/how-spammer-harvest-your-email/comment-page-1/#comment-31247</link> <dc:creator>Sea Coast</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:59:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10088#comment-31247</guid> <description>Will SeacoastNH25@aol.com get spammed because I post here?  Or is this site protected?Thanks, SeacoastNH25@aol.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will <a
href="mailto:SeacoastNH25@aol.com">SeacoastNH25@aol.com</a> get spammed because I post here?  Or is this site protected?</p><p>Thanks, <a
href="mailto:SeacoastNH25@aol.com">SeacoastNH25@aol.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: scopy</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/how-spammer-harvest-your-email/comment-page-1/#comment-30282</link> <dc:creator>scopy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:16:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10088#comment-30282</guid> <description>It&#039;s surprising how they do it. Most if not all business get a huge amount of spam. There is a few other techniques out there to reduce the spam levels but if you ever made a mistake in the past you will always pay for it. The only method left is damage limitation through filters.Another method of putting a email address on a website is to have a picture. This method as been around for a while now but webmasters choose not to do to use them, the same as using &quot;at&quot; instead of @ and the JavaScript method.The main reason for this is it ticks off any user that want to email you. especially if your domain is hard to spell or long.I would say the JavaScript method would be the best if it does not inconvenience the user but it does not work if JavaScript is turned off in the browser.Nothing at the moment is bullet proof for what is considered normal use.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s surprising how they do it. Most if not all business get a huge amount of spam. There is a few other techniques out there to reduce the spam levels but if you ever made a mistake in the past you will always pay for it. The only method left is damage limitation through filters.</p><p>Another method of putting a email address on a website is to have a picture. This method as been around for a while now but webmasters choose not to do to use them, the same as using &#8220;at&#8221; instead of @ and the JavaScript method.</p><p>The main reason for this is it ticks off any user that want to email you. especially if your domain is hard to spell or long.</p><p>I would say the JavaScript method would be the best if it does not inconvenience the user but it does not work if JavaScript is turned off in the browser.</p><p>Nothing at the moment is bullet proof for what is considered normal use.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 33/44 queries in 0.017 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.pcmech.com @ 2012-02-15 12:46:48 -->
