<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Integrated Developer Tools Built Into IE8</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/integrated-developer-tools-built-into-ie8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/integrated-developer-tools-built-into-ie8/</link> <description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Bruce Stoner</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/integrated-developer-tools-built-into-ie8/comment-page-1/#comment-36171</link> <dc:creator>Bruce Stoner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:35:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10391#comment-36171</guid> <description>Internet Explorer 8 seems to be better than any previous version of IE. IE8 is very stable and rarely crashes or cause blue screens.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internet Explorer 8 seems to be better than any previous version of IE. IE8 is very stable and rarely crashes or cause blue screens.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason Faulkner</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/integrated-developer-tools-built-into-ie8/comment-page-1/#comment-33242</link> <dc:creator>Jason Faulkner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:57:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10391#comment-33242</guid> <description>I didn&#039;t know there was a debate...
As with anything browser related, it always boils down to personal preference. Since IE8 uses a newer and more robust rendering engine, I would err on the side of it. However, if you like your current IE7+IE7Pro combo, then stick with it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know there was a debate&#8230;<br
/> As with anything browser related, it always boils down to personal preference. Since IE8 uses a newer and more robust rendering engine, I would err on the side of it. However, if you like your current IE7+IE7Pro combo, then stick with it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter O'Brien</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/integrated-developer-tools-built-into-ie8/comment-page-1/#comment-33224</link> <dc:creator>Peter O'Brien</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:56:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10391#comment-33224</guid> <description>Whilst on the subject of IE8 - I would be grateful if you would finish the debate of ....(IE7 + IE7Pro) vs. IE8I have delayed updating to IE8 awaiting the outcome.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst on the subject of IE8 &#8211; I would be grateful if you would finish the debate of &#8230;.</p><p>(IE7 + IE7Pro) vs. IE8</p><p>I have delayed updating to IE8 awaiting the outcome.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 34/45 queries in 0.017 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.pcmech.com @ 2012-02-15 12:53:30 -->
