<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Confusing The Crap Out Of Everyone With New Chip Names</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/intel-confusing-the-crap-out-of-everyone-with-new-chip-names/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/intel-confusing-the-crap-out-of-everyone-with-new-chip-names/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:46:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/intel-confusing-the-crap-out-of-everyone-with-new-chip-names/comment-page-1/#comment-26387</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/intel-confusing-the-crap-out-of-everyone-with-new-chip-names/#comment-26387</guid>
		<description>This just makes it worse. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_microprocessors. Core 2 Duo range was a headache for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just makes it worse. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_microprocessors" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_microprocessors</a>. Core 2 Duo range was a headache for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Menga</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/intel-confusing-the-crap-out-of-everyone-with-new-chip-names/comment-page-1/#comment-26326</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Menga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/intel-confusing-the-crap-out-of-everyone-with-new-chip-names/#comment-26326</guid>
		<description>I&#039;M NOT DAVE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;M NOT DAVE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monte</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/intel-confusing-the-crap-out-of-everyone-with-new-chip-names/comment-page-1/#comment-26325</link>
		<dc:creator>Monte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/intel-confusing-the-crap-out-of-everyone-with-new-chip-names/#comment-26325</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

Do you really want to know why Intel went away from the numerical naming of it&#039;s processors?

A suit by AMD, the Judge ruled that Intel couldn&#039;t copyright a number so we now have the Pentium, Core 2, and the i series...

Way to go AMD!

Now we techs need a cheat sheet, thanks for the research Dave!

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>Do you really want to know why Intel went away from the numerical naming of it&#8217;s processors?</p>
<p>A suit by AMD, the Judge ruled that Intel couldn&#8217;t copyright a number so we now have the Pentium, Core 2, and the i series&#8230;</p>
<p>Way to go AMD!</p>
<p>Now we techs need a cheat sheet, thanks for the research Dave!</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.pcmech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
