<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Intel Confusing The Crap Out Of Everyone With New Chip Names</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/intel-confusing-the-crap-out-of-everyone-with-new-chip-names/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/intel-confusing-the-crap-out-of-everyone-with-new-chip-names/</link> <description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/intel-confusing-the-crap-out-of-everyone-with-new-chip-names/comment-page-1/#comment-26387</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:00:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/intel-confusing-the-crap-out-of-everyone-with-new-chip-names/#comment-26387</guid> <description>This just makes it worse. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_microprocessors. Core 2 Duo range was a headache for me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just makes it worse. <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_microprocessors" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_microprocessors</a>. Core 2 Duo range was a headache for me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rich Menga</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/intel-confusing-the-crap-out-of-everyone-with-new-chip-names/comment-page-1/#comment-26326</link> <dc:creator>Rich Menga</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:14:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/intel-confusing-the-crap-out-of-everyone-with-new-chip-names/#comment-26326</guid> <description>I&#039;M NOT DAVE.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;M NOT DAVE.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Monte</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/intel-confusing-the-crap-out-of-everyone-with-new-chip-names/comment-page-1/#comment-26325</link> <dc:creator>Monte</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:10:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/intel-confusing-the-crap-out-of-everyone-with-new-chip-names/#comment-26325</guid> <description>Hi Dave,Do you really want to know why Intel went away from the numerical naming of it&#039;s processors?A suit by AMD, the Judge ruled that Intel couldn&#039;t copyright a number so we now have the Pentium, Core 2, and the i series...Way to go AMD!Now we techs need a cheat sheet, thanks for the research Dave!:)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p><p>Do you really want to know why Intel went away from the numerical naming of it&#8217;s processors?</p><p>A suit by AMD, the Judge ruled that Intel couldn&#8217;t copyright a number so we now have the Pentium, Core 2, and the i series&#8230;</p><p>Way to go AMD!</p><p>Now we techs need a cheat sheet, thanks for the research Dave!</p><p> <img
src='http://pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 34/45 queries in 0.025 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.pcmech.com @ 2012-02-15 13:57:28 -->
