<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Introducing Google Chrome: The Coolness is Under the Surface</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/</link> <description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: PCMech: Chrome Usage at 5.67% &#124; PCMech</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/comment-page-1/#comment-14273</link> <dc:creator>PCMech: Chrome Usage at 5.67% &#124; PCMech</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:53:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/#comment-14273</guid> <description>[...] are the reports I am seeing across the Internet about the percentages of users who are now using Google Chrome. Techcrunch, for example, reports 6.23% usage on their [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are the reports I am seeing across the Internet about the percentages of users who are now using Google Chrome. Techcrunch, for example, reports 6.23% usage on their [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Beyond &#187; The Bitter Taste of Chrome?</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/comment-page-1/#comment-14216</link> <dc:creator>Beyond &#187; The Bitter Taste of Chrome?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:43:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/#comment-14216</guid> <description>[...] http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/   It&#8217;s a nice browser; I think everyone is agreed on that to some extent. According to the T&amp;C that you agree to prior to downloading the beta, however, there may be a significant sting in the tail. I&#8217;m looking particularly at section 11.1:- [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a
href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/</a> It&#8217;s a nice browser; I think everyone is agreed on that to some extent. According to the T&amp;C that you agree to prior to downloading the beta, however, there may be a significant sting in the tail. I&#8217;m looking particularly at section 11.1:- [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sharron Field</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/comment-page-1/#comment-14212</link> <dc:creator>Sharron Field</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:53:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/#comment-14212</guid> <description>I&#039;m a bit anxious about the following contained within the T&amp;C:-&quot;11. Content licence from you&quot;&quot;11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights that you already hold in Content that you submit, post or display on or through the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying the content, you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free and non-exclusive licence to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content that you submit, post or display on or through the Services. This licence is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the Additional Terms of those Services.&quot;This appears to indicate that anything that you send via this browser becomes the property of Google for their purposes; and gives them the right to display such publicly om the Internet.With this in mind I&#039;m wary about using it.How do others interpret this? I&#039;d be interested to find out what you think.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit anxious about the following contained within the T&amp;C:-</p><p>&#8220;11. Content licence from you&#8221;</p><p>&#8220;11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights that you already hold in Content that you submit, post or display on or through the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying the content, you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free and non-exclusive licence to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content that you submit, post or display on or through the Services. This licence is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the Additional Terms of those Services.&#8221;</p><p>This appears to indicate that anything that you send via this browser becomes the property of Google for their purposes; and gives them the right to display such publicly om the Internet.</p><p>With this in mind I&#8217;m wary about using it.</p><p>How do others interpret this? I&#8217;d be interested to find out what you think.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dusty</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/comment-page-1/#comment-14211</link> <dc:creator>Dusty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:51:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/#comment-14211</guid> <description>Google has done a nice job for this to be a Beta release. The speed is great, the system resources stayed low and it rendered most websites I tested very well. One of the best features is the Paste and Go option they inherited from Opera. This is one option I wish FF had also. I did find Java to be a pain in the butt when logging into Webmin on my Web Server. It displayed a message that the plug-in was not available. Overall, I give Google Chrome 2 thumbs up.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has done a nice job for this to be a Beta release. The speed is great, the system resources stayed low and it rendered most websites I tested very well. One of the best features is the Paste and Go option they inherited from Opera. This is one option I wish FF had also. I did find Java to be a pain in the butt when logging into Webmin on my Web Server. It displayed a message that the plug-in was not available. Overall, I give Google Chrome 2 thumbs up.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Can Google Chrome Be a Windows Killer? &#124; PCMech</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/comment-page-1/#comment-14209</link> <dc:creator>Can Google Chrome Be a Windows Killer? &#124; PCMech</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:25:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/#comment-14209</guid> <description>[...] Chrome is obviously set up for web apps, and most obvious would be Google&#8217;s offerings. Chrome is a multi-task browser, with tabs each running as separate processes. A number of design changes present in Chrome make it [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chrome is obviously set up for web apps, and most obvious would be Google&#8217;s offerings. Chrome is a multi-task browser, with tabs each running as separate processes. A number of design changes present in Chrome make it [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Google Chrome (Video) &#124; PCMech</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/comment-page-1/#comment-14207</link> <dc:creator>Google Chrome (Video) &#124; PCMech</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:51:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/#comment-14207</guid> <description>[...] Chrome is a web browser very recently released by Google. While Dave concentrated more on the &#8220;guts&#8221; of the browser, I concentrated more on its usability. What I [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chrome is a web browser very recently released by Google. While Dave concentrated more on the &#8220;guts&#8221; of the browser, I concentrated more on its usability. What I [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: perkster</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/comment-page-1/#comment-14190</link> <dc:creator>perkster</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:44:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/#comment-14190</guid> <description>tried Chome this morning, very fast, quite nice look to it, to be honest with the bookmark toolbar its very much like firefox and rendered the pages and CSS more like firefox than any other browser. It was very fast at loading pages but I still dont think it offers the versatility of FF. When there are add-ons and its gone through some more development it may well be a winner but great beta release nice work google! I don&#039;t use google apps so the gears integration is of no relevance to me personally. If google can now release their own Linux distro with all their apps, browser and other software built in it could be total domination.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tried Chome this morning, very fast, quite nice look to it, to be honest with the bookmark toolbar its very much like firefox and rendered the pages and CSS more like firefox than any other browser. It was very fast at loading pages but I still dont think it offers the versatility of FF. When there are add-ons and its gone through some more development it may well be a winner but great beta release nice work google! I don&#8217;t use google apps so the gears integration is of no relevance to me personally. If google can now release their own Linux distro with all their apps, browser and other software built in it could be total domination.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Emp</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/comment-page-1/#comment-14186</link> <dc:creator>Emp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:55:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/#comment-14186</guid> <description>Ummm, no it doesn&#039;t, unlike Vista this isn&#039;t some rehash, Chrome has some great ideas behind it, and I don&#039;t understand why people expect browsers to be like Firefox. Newsflash, it ain&#039;t.
As I said, Chrome has some great ideas that all browsers, even IE can benefit from, sandboxing the tabs is just brilliant.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm, no it doesn&#8217;t, unlike Vista this isn&#8217;t some rehash, Chrome has some great ideas behind it, and I don&#8217;t understand why people expect browsers to be like Firefox. Newsflash, it ain&#8217;t.<br
/> As I said, Chrome has some great ideas that all browsers, even IE can benefit from, sandboxing the tabs is just brilliant.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David M</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/comment-page-1/#comment-14180</link> <dc:creator>David M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:38:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/#comment-14180</guid> <description>I&#039;m going to pass.  I don&#039;t see any real good reason to switch from Firefox.  This makes it sorta like the Vista release doesn&#039;t it?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to pass.  I don&#8217;t see any real good reason to switch from Firefox.  This makes it sorta like the Vista release doesn&#8217;t it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill @ MaxHomeBits</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/comment-page-1/#comment-14172</link> <dc:creator>Bill @ MaxHomeBits</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:09:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/introducing-google-chrome-the-coolness-is-under-the-surface/#comment-14172</guid> <description>Interesting read, i have downloaded IE8 today and so far it sucks which is usaly the case with Beta versions.
A lot of my plugins like skyp, roboform and others dont work YET!
I agree i couldnt do without Firefox plugins, so will probably wait for further developements.
Its all about Browsers catching up with web 2.0, it seems that they are lagging behind in the techy race.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read, i have downloaded IE8 today and so far it sucks which is usaly the case with Beta versions.<br
/> A lot of my plugins like skyp, roboform and others dont work YET!<br
/> I agree i couldnt do without Firefox plugins, so will probably wait for further developements.<br
/> Its all about Browsers catching up with web 2.0, it seems that they are lagging behind in the techy race.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 33/51 queries in 0.022 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.pcmech.com @ 2012-02-15 13:55:38 -->
