<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: iPad 3 Reactions Are Hilarious&#8230; And Stupid</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/ipad-3-reactions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/ipad-3-reactions/</link> <description>Tech Powered Life... Simplified</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 03:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator> <item><title>By: Dmorgan</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/ipad-3-reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-77666</link> <dc:creator>Dmorgan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=15650#comment-77666</guid> <description>I think that is one of the best things about Apple is that they keep advancing their products! There is no requirement that one must buy a new version each time new version/model comes out. Could you imagine where we would be if they stopped at the Apple II Plus!As for the negative comments, there will always be some. It is nice when there is some logic and intelligence contained within!Thanks for the article David.I enjoyed it!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is one of the best things about Apple is that they keep advancing their products! There is no requirement that one must buy a new version each time new version/model comes out. Could you imagine where we would be if they stopped at the Apple II Plus!</p><p>As for the negative comments, there will always be some. It is nice when there is some logic and intelligence contained within!</p><p>Thanks for the article David.I enjoyed it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Folonja</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/ipad-3-reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-77527</link> <dc:creator>Folonja</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=15650#comment-77527</guid> <description>Being from a third world developing country, I rarely touch base with Apple products; they&#039;re just not made accessible to us. Since it seems PCMech is so Apple-centric, I doubt they&#039;ll be much in it of much benefit to me. I&#039;ll give it a pass.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being from a third world developing country, I rarely touch base with Apple products; they&#8217;re just not made accessible to us. Since it seems PCMech is so Apple-centric, I doubt they&#8217;ll be much in it of much benefit to me. I&#8217;ll give it a pass.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Samuel</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/ipad-3-reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-77524</link> <dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=15650#comment-77524</guid> <description>I&#039;m just not convinced, the only way to use extra pixels to get more data onto a screen is to make it all smaller.  Too small and they might make it a bit tricky to read.  As far as a &#039;lot more&#039;, I have serious doubts.  Text doesn&#039;t take a lot of resolution, I&#039;m sure the old ipad could have shrunk the text size so it could display more at once, and yet they didn&#039;t.I have a 22&quot; 1080p monitor (sit about 2&#039; away), and I really wouldn&#039;t want more data at once even if it could display it.  Imagining something with even more pixels and reduced to 9.7&quot;, I can&#039;t see how it would be possible to take advantage of it all without having to resort to a magnifying glass.That is for text, talking about games then I can see some of the appeal, it just looks better.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just not convinced, the only way to use extra pixels to get more data onto a screen is to make it all smaller.  Too small and they might make it a bit tricky to read.  As far as a &#8216;lot more&#8217;, I have serious doubts.  Text doesn&#8217;t take a lot of resolution, I&#8217;m sure the old ipad could have shrunk the text size so it could display more at once, and yet they didn&#8217;t.</p><p>I have a 22&#8243; 1080p monitor (sit about 2&#8242; away), and I really wouldn&#8217;t want more data at once even if it could display it.  Imagining something with even more pixels and reduced to 9.7&#8243;, I can&#8217;t see how it would be possible to take advantage of it all without having to resort to a magnifying glass.</p><p>That is for text, talking about games then I can see some of the appeal, it just looks better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dirtfarmer1953</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/ipad-3-reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-77502</link> <dc:creator>dirtfarmer1953</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=15650#comment-77502</guid> <description>how much did  apple  pay you to  write this</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how much did  apple  pay you to  write this</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/ipad-3-reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-77486</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=15650#comment-77486</guid> <description> Here&#039;s some good news for all your iPad owners! GotoCamera, www.gotocamera.com the world&#039;s leading surveillance, monitoring, and security service with over 100,000 customers from over 180
countries, has come out with a free iPad app for their customers. All that one needs to do, is set-up an account with them and hook up a webcam to monitor their home, office or business. Once the
account is set-up, you can access your cameras (snapshots and videos), view and manage your camera footage stored on the GotoCamera servers, and change your motion detection settings. The best part about this service? - It&#039;s FREE! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Here&#8217;s some good news for all your iPad owners! GotoCamera, <a
href="http://www.gotocamera.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gotocamera.com</a> the world&#8217;s leading surveillance, monitoring, and security service with over 100,000 customers from over 180<br
/> countries, has come out with a free iPad app for their customers. All that one needs to do, is set-up an account with them and hook up a webcam to monitor their home, office or business. Once the<br
/> account is set-up, you can access your cameras (snapshots and videos), view and manage your camera footage stored on the GotoCamera servers, and change your motion detection settings. The best part about this service? &#8211; It&#8217;s FREE!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Risley</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/ipad-3-reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-77484</link> <dc:creator>David Risley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=15650#comment-77484</guid> <description>I think the same thing happens with non-Apple products, though. There are always better things coming out, no matter when you choose to buy.And, sure, Apple isn&#039;t always first. But, there&#039;s a difference between being first... and being first to make it mainstream and something &quot;normal&quot; people will use.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the same thing happens with non-Apple products, though. There are always better things coming out, no matter when you choose to buy.</p><p>And, sure, Apple isn&#8217;t always first. But, there&#8217;s a difference between being first&#8230; and being first to make it mainstream and something &#8220;normal&#8221; people will use.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Risley</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/ipad-3-reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-77483</link> <dc:creator>David Risley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=15650#comment-77483</guid> <description>I know the higher resolution makes a big difference on the iPhone. Better images, yes. But, if the app developer creates the app accordingly, you can get a lot more data on screen.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the higher resolution makes a big difference on the iPhone. Better images, yes. But, if the app developer creates the app accordingly, you can get a lot more data on screen.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt Ball</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/ipad-3-reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-77481</link> <dc:creator>Matt Ball</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=15650#comment-77481</guid> <description>i never claimed android didn&#039;t have the most mobile viruses. i&#039;m saying its success is not entirely dependent on this fact, and that improvement will happen. if you really think android is significantly worse/will fold because of it, what can i say?! let it play out and we will see if android devices are no more in a year or so.launch issues..? sorry, i forgot that all products launched are perfect straight off. as i remember all apple products have been perfect...i could find plenty of sources claiming vulnerabilities in other browsers and os&#039;. chrome&#039;s record in hackthons is impressive (although defeated at the most recent), it hasn&#039;t been defeated every time like the other major browsers.
consistently offering money to those who can find exploits does sound &#039;concerned&#039; to me. they aren&#039;t doing it just to throw away money are they..if popularity is anything to go by, one could determine it as the best browser if the general tech opinion of &#039;ie is crap&#039; were put on it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i never claimed android didn&#8217;t have the most mobile viruses. i&#8217;m saying its success is not entirely dependent on this fact, and that improvement will happen. if you really think android is significantly worse/will fold because of it, what can i say?! let it play out and we will see if android devices are no more in a year or so.</p><p>launch issues..? sorry, i forgot that all products launched are perfect straight off. as i remember all apple products have been perfect&#8230;</p><p>i could find plenty of sources claiming vulnerabilities in other browsers and os&#8217;. chrome&#8217;s record in hackthons is impressive (although defeated at the most recent), it hasn&#8217;t been defeated every time like the other major browsers.<br
/> consistently offering money to those who can find exploits does sound &#8216;concerned&#8217; to me. they aren&#8217;t doing it just to throw away money are they..if popularity is anything to go by, one could determine it as the best browser if the general tech opinion of &#8216;ie is crap&#8217; were put on it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rich</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/ipad-3-reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-77479</link> <dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=15650#comment-77479</guid> <description>The most viruses for mobile are on Android, and this is undisputed fact.Chrome secure? It had the worst password security on launch. http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2008/dec/14/browser-password-securityAnd more than 1/4 of Chrome extensions released are insecure. http://www.ghacks.net/2011/10/12/27-out-of-100-chrome-extensions-insecure/None of that sounds like &quot;concerned&quot; to me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most viruses for mobile are on Android, and this is undisputed fact.</p><p>Chrome secure? It had the worst password security on launch. http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2008/dec/14/browser-password-security</p><p>And more than 1/4 of Chrome extensions released are insecure. http://www.ghacks.net/2011/10/12/27-out-of-100-chrome-extensions-insecure/</p><p>None of that sounds like &#8220;concerned&#8221; to me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt Ball</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/ipad-3-reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-77477</link> <dc:creator>Matt Ball</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=15650#comment-77477</guid> <description>no, but then you can agree with me that viruses are a big issue. i&#039;m talking on a personal use basis, not users working for large corporations.i realise os x is a unix based system, hence my comment. whilst there is a lot of people using it, a LOT more are using windows..that sounds more like you having a problem with google and its products. if you don&#039;t like them, or are on the apple payroll, fair enough, i don&#039;t care, it&#039;s of no loss to me :)  from a quick look at google, given an outsiders view, i&#039;d say they&#039;re quite concerned about security. one doesn&#039;t go and build one of the most secure browsers (and then &#039;os&#039;) around without a care for security. they aren&#039;t constantly in the news for poorly protected products either.. more their privacy policies of late.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, but then you can agree with me that viruses are a big issue. i&#8217;m talking on a personal use basis, not users working for large corporations.</p><p>i realise os x is a unix based system, hence my comment. whilst there is a lot of people using it, a LOT more are using windows..</p><p>that sounds more like you having a problem with google and its products. if you don&#8217;t like them, or are on the apple payroll, fair enough, i don&#8217;t care, it&#8217;s of no loss to me <img
src='http://pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  from a quick look at google, given an outsiders view, i&#8217;d say they&#8217;re quite concerned about security. one doesn&#8217;t go and build one of the most secure browsers (and then &#8216;os&#8217;) around without a care for security. they aren&#8217;t constantly in the news for poorly protected products either.. more their privacy policies of late.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 43/71 queries in 0.030 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.pcmech.com @ 2013-02-12 16:53:04 --