<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is 2GB RAM Now The Standard?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-16472</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/#comment-16472</guid>
		<description>Whether you believe it or not is up to you, but you can&#039;t argue with facts. When I see 25% of 6GB RAM used when I do a fresh reboot, then you tell me - what&#039;s 25% of 6GB? Just b/c you don&#039;t believe it to be true doesn&#039;t mean to say it isn&#039;t.

You&#039;re most likely unaware that Vista preloads empty RAM with files it thinks you&#039;ll be using soon. It&#039;s called Superfetch. Vista flushes the RAM it has pre-cached if you end up needing it later on.
By the sounds of it, your system most likely has between 2-4GB of RAM, therefore only pre-caching a certain amount into RAM when it boots up. Thus, the difference between your &#039;just under 1GB&#039; and my 1.5GB.

Look it up if you want more information: http://www.ocmodshop.com/ocmodshop.aspx?a=1048</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether you believe it or not is up to you, but you can&#8217;t argue with facts. When I see 25% of 6GB RAM used when I do a fresh reboot, then you tell me &#8211; what&#8217;s 25% of 6GB? Just b/c you don&#8217;t believe it to be true doesn&#8217;t mean to say it isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re most likely unaware that Vista preloads empty RAM with files it thinks you&#8217;ll be using soon. It&#8217;s called Superfetch. Vista flushes the RAM it has pre-cached if you end up needing it later on.<br />
By the sounds of it, your system most likely has between 2-4GB of RAM, therefore only pre-caching a certain amount into RAM when it boots up. Thus, the difference between your &#8216;just under 1GB&#8217; and my 1.5GB.</p>
<p>Look it up if you want more information: <a href="http://www.ocmodshop.com/ocmodshop.aspx?a=1048" rel="nofollow">http://www.ocmodshop.com/ocmodshop.aspx?a=1048</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lespaul20</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-16471</link>
		<dc:creator>Lespaul20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/#comment-16471</guid>
		<description>1.5GB on start up? No offense but I have a hard time believing that. The most I ever had is just under 1GB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.5GB on start up? No offense but I have a hard time believing that. The most I ever had is just under 1GB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-16457</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/#comment-16457</guid>
		<description>I agree that 2GB is standard, unless you are running 64bit Vista - then I say go 4GB. Reasons? Well, really only one - Vista sucks up about 1.5GB just on boot up. Period. That&#039;s after a fresh install, optimized tweaks and no software loading up automatically.
About 2 months back, I bought an Intel Quad Core 2.6Ghz with 6GB&#039;s of RAM and 1.5GB&#039;s got chewed up instantly before anything was even running. After being an XP fanboy since it&#039;s release, to say I was in total shock would be an understatement.
I&#039;m going to put another 2GB in as RAM is so cheap nowadays and I can then reclaim my lost 1.5GB&#039;s, but that&#039;s just b/c I&#039;ve generally got about 5 things happening at once. My PC runs super smooth without the extra 2GB but an extra RAM chip never goes astray! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that 2GB is standard, unless you are running 64bit Vista &#8211; then I say go 4GB. Reasons? Well, really only one &#8211; Vista sucks up about 1.5GB just on boot up. Period. That&#8217;s after a fresh install, optimized tweaks and no software loading up automatically.<br />
About 2 months back, I bought an Intel Quad Core 2.6Ghz with 6GB&#8217;s of RAM and 1.5GB&#8217;s got chewed up instantly before anything was even running. After being an XP fanboy since it&#8217;s release, to say I was in total shock would be an understatement.<br />
I&#8217;m going to put another 2GB in as RAM is so cheap nowadays and I can then reclaim my lost 1.5GB&#8217;s, but that&#8217;s just b/c I&#8217;ve generally got about 5 things happening at once. My PC runs super smooth without the extra 2GB but an extra RAM chip never goes astray! <img src='http://www.pcmech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeekLad</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-16453</link>
		<dc:creator>GeekLad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/#comment-16453</guid>
		<description>I wish hardware manufacturers would get their stuff together with putting together decent 64-bit drivers for 64-bit XP and Vista (maybe it&#039;s better now, I tried going 64-bit about a year and a half ago and it was a pain).  As cheap as memory is now, putting together a 4GB system is easy to do but you can&#039;t take advantage of it without a 64-bit OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish hardware manufacturers would get their stuff together with putting together decent 64-bit drivers for 64-bit XP and Vista (maybe it&#8217;s better now, I tried going 64-bit about a year and a half ago and it was a pain).  As cheap as memory is now, putting together a 4GB system is easy to do but you can&#8217;t take advantage of it without a 64-bit OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
