<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Is 2GB RAM Now The Standard?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/</link> <description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Drew</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-16472</link> <dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:33:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/#comment-16472</guid> <description>Whether you believe it or not is up to you, but you can&#039;t argue with facts. When I see 25% of 6GB RAM used when I do a fresh reboot, then you tell me - what&#039;s 25% of 6GB? Just b/c you don&#039;t believe it to be true doesn&#039;t mean to say it isn&#039;t.You&#039;re most likely unaware that Vista preloads empty RAM with files it thinks you&#039;ll be using soon. It&#039;s called Superfetch. Vista flushes the RAM it has pre-cached if you end up needing it later on.
By the sounds of it, your system most likely has between 2-4GB of RAM, therefore only pre-caching a certain amount into RAM when it boots up. Thus, the difference between your &#039;just under 1GB&#039; and my 1.5GB.Look it up if you want more information: http://www.ocmodshop.com/ocmodshop.aspx?a=1048</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether you believe it or not is up to you, but you can&#8217;t argue with facts. When I see 25% of 6GB RAM used when I do a fresh reboot, then you tell me &#8211; what&#8217;s 25% of 6GB? Just b/c you don&#8217;t believe it to be true doesn&#8217;t mean to say it isn&#8217;t.</p><p>You&#8217;re most likely unaware that Vista preloads empty RAM with files it thinks you&#8217;ll be using soon. It&#8217;s called Superfetch. Vista flushes the RAM it has pre-cached if you end up needing it later on.<br
/> By the sounds of it, your system most likely has between 2-4GB of RAM, therefore only pre-caching a certain amount into RAM when it boots up. Thus, the difference between your &#8216;just under 1GB&#8217; and my 1.5GB.</p><p>Look it up if you want more information: <a
href="http://www.ocmodshop.com/ocmodshop.aspx?a=1048" rel="nofollow">http://www.ocmodshop.com/ocmodshop.aspx?a=1048</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lespaul20</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-16471</link> <dc:creator>Lespaul20</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:08:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/#comment-16471</guid> <description>1.5GB on start up? No offense but I have a hard time believing that. The most I ever had is just under 1GB.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.5GB on start up? No offense but I have a hard time believing that. The most I ever had is just under 1GB.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Drew</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-16457</link> <dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:55:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/#comment-16457</guid> <description>I agree that 2GB is standard, unless you are running 64bit Vista - then I say go 4GB. Reasons? Well, really only one - Vista sucks up about 1.5GB just on boot up. Period. That&#039;s after a fresh install, optimized tweaks and no software loading up automatically.
About 2 months back, I bought an Intel Quad Core 2.6Ghz with 6GB&#039;s of RAM and 1.5GB&#039;s got chewed up instantly before anything was even running. After being an XP fanboy since it&#039;s release, to say I was in total shock would be an understatement.
I&#039;m going to put another 2GB in as RAM is so cheap nowadays and I can then reclaim my lost 1.5GB&#039;s, but that&#039;s just b/c I&#039;ve generally got about 5 things happening at once. My PC runs super smooth without the extra 2GB but an extra RAM chip never goes astray! :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that 2GB is standard, unless you are running 64bit Vista &#8211; then I say go 4GB. Reasons? Well, really only one &#8211; Vista sucks up about 1.5GB just on boot up. Period. That&#8217;s after a fresh install, optimized tweaks and no software loading up automatically.<br
/> About 2 months back, I bought an Intel Quad Core 2.6Ghz with 6GB&#8217;s of RAM and 1.5GB&#8217;s got chewed up instantly before anything was even running. After being an XP fanboy since it&#8217;s release, to say I was in total shock would be an understatement.<br
/> I&#8217;m going to put another 2GB in as RAM is so cheap nowadays and I can then reclaim my lost 1.5GB&#8217;s, but that&#8217;s just b/c I&#8217;ve generally got about 5 things happening at once. My PC runs super smooth without the extra 2GB but an extra RAM chip never goes astray! <img
src='http://pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GeekLad</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-16453</link> <dc:creator>GeekLad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:17:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-2gb-ram-now-the-standard/#comment-16453</guid> <description>I wish hardware manufacturers would get their stuff together with putting together decent 64-bit drivers for 64-bit XP and Vista (maybe it&#039;s better now, I tried going 64-bit about a year and a half ago and it was a pain).  As cheap as memory is now, putting together a 4GB system is easy to do but you can&#039;t take advantage of it without a 64-bit OS.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish hardware manufacturers would get their stuff together with putting together decent 64-bit drivers for 64-bit XP and Vista (maybe it&#8217;s better now, I tried going 64-bit about a year and a half ago and it was a pain).  As cheap as memory is now, putting together a 4GB system is easy to do but you can&#8217;t take advantage of it without a 64-bit OS.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 34/46 queries in 0.017 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.pcmech.com @ 2012-02-15 10:13:18 -->
