<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Is It Worth The $200 To Go With A 120GB SSD?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-it-worth-the-200-to-go-with-a-120gb-ssd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-it-worth-the-200-to-go-with-a-120gb-ssd/</link> <description>Tech Powered Life... Simplified</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 03:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator> <item><title>By: Samuel Spira</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-it-worth-the-200-to-go-with-a-120gb-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-77975</link> <dc:creator>Samuel Spira</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=16219#comment-77975</guid> <description>I like the idea of using the SSD as host for the operating system and putting all the data on a conventional HDD. But I&#039;m not sure how to go about it. I currently have everything on one drive - C: . How do I &quot;tell&quot; Win7 to put only the OS on the SSD and everything else, now and in the future, on the HDD? Pardon my ignorance if this is a no-brainer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of using the SSD as host for the operating system and putting all the data on a conventional HDD. But I&#8217;m not sure how to go about it. I currently have everything on one drive &#8211; C: . How do I &#8220;tell&#8221; Win7 to put only the OS on the SSD and everything else, now and in the future, on the HDD? Pardon my ignorance if this is a no-brainer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Samuel Spira</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-it-worth-the-200-to-go-with-a-120gb-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-77974</link> <dc:creator>Samuel Spira</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=16219#comment-77974</guid> <description>I like the idea of using the SSD as host for the operating system and putting all the data on a conventional HDD. But I&#039;m not sure how to go about it. I currently have everything on one drive - C: . How do I &quot;tell&quot; Win7 to put only the OS on the SSD and everything else, now and in the future, on the HDD? Pardon my ignorance if this is a no-brainer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of using the SSD as host for the operating system and putting all the data on a conventional HDD. But I&#8217;m not sure how to go about it. I currently have everything on one drive &#8211; C: . How do I &#8220;tell&#8221; Win7 to put only the OS on the SSD and everything else, now and in the future, on the HDD? Pardon my ignorance if this is a no-brainer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt Ball</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-it-worth-the-200-to-go-with-a-120gb-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-77961</link> <dc:creator>Matt Ball</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=16219#comment-77961</guid> <description>i agree. xp may not be optimised for ssd&#039;s but in my experience they have been fine. the corsair and ocz drives seem to have been good as well so long as the firmware is updated and stability is tested prior to going and loading up everything.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree. xp may not be optimised for ssd&#8217;s but in my experience they have been fine. the corsair and ocz drives seem to have been good as well so long as the firmware is updated and stability is tested prior to going and loading up everything.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt Ball</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-it-worth-the-200-to-go-with-a-120gb-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-77962</link> <dc:creator>Matt Ball</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=16219#comment-77962</guid> <description>i agree. xp may not be optimised for ssd&#039;s but in my experience they have been fine. the corsair and ocz drives seem to have been good as well so long as the firmware is updated and stability is tested prior to going and loading up everything.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree. xp may not be optimised for ssd&#8217;s but in my experience they have been fine. the corsair and ocz drives seem to have been good as well so long as the firmware is updated and stability is tested prior to going and loading up everything.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Monte</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/is-it-worth-the-200-to-go-with-a-120gb-ssd/comment-page-1/#comment-77957</link> <dc:creator>Monte</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=16219#comment-77957</guid> <description>Hello Rich,
I have to disagree with you on a few of points:1) I have had an OCZ SSD in my tower for over three years with XP on it with out one failure between the SSD and XP.  (Also a dual boot XP and Win7)2) I have five articles about the hardware of a SSD and Operating Systems on my blog and two articles on my web site about SSDs. None of my research suggests any incompatibilities between XP and a SSD.3) I have four laptops that have three different brands running XP or Server 2003 on a SSD&#039;s with out failure over the last two years.4) My research for my latest blog suggests that the cost per GB on a SSD is dropping, the 120 GB is now going from $80 to $90, that is about 0.02 USD per GB, not as cheap as a mechanical hard drive but getting there.If you want to see my research on the SSD it is in the Hardware category.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Rich,<br
/> I have to disagree with you on a few of points:</p><p>1) I have had an OCZ SSD in my tower for over three years with XP on it with out one failure between the SSD and XP.  (Also a dual boot XP and Win7)</p><p>2) I have five articles about the hardware of a SSD and Operating Systems on my blog and two articles on my web site about SSDs. None of my research suggests any incompatibilities between XP and a SSD.</p><p>3) I have four laptops that have three different brands running XP or Server 2003 on a SSD&#8217;s with out failure over the last two years.</p><p>4) My research for my latest blog suggests that the cost per GB on a SSD is dropping, the 120 GB is now going from $80 to $90, that is about 0.02 USD per GB, not as cheap as a mechanical hard drive but getting there.</p><p>If you want to see my research on the SSD it is in the Hardware category.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 41/54 queries in 0.023 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.pcmech.com @ 2013-02-12 10:47:31 --