<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux Mint, The Ubuntu That Should Have Been?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:37:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TL</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/comment-page-1/#comment-30979</link>
		<dc:creator>TL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/#comment-30979</guid>
		<description>Actually, playing flash video IS impressive.... strangely</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, playing flash video IS impressive&#8230;. strangely</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m0deth</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/comment-page-1/#comment-26807</link>
		<dc:creator>m0deth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/#comment-26807</guid>
		<description>@Aphex

&quot;So heres the part where I say, its Free and its not ever meant to directly compete with Windows or OSX.&quot; - I&#039;m sorry, Canonical and many others would argue with you on this one, whether you like it or not, Linux is being pushed as the third alternative, which obviously will attract new users, get over yourselves, your little clandestine nerd-world is breaking up. And another clue, &quot;it&#039;s free&quot; is no excuse for unfinished, broken, missing pieces, or otherwise unusable for the greater part of users interested. period.

&quot;If you don’t like the command-line why use gnu/linux? Its one of the best things about it.&quot; - Absolutely wrong...the command line is both necessary, AND legacy...like 15 years legacy...it&#039;s not the best thing about it by far. Two major player/groups are responsible for this with their inability to round off their GUI environments 15 or so years on, we all know who they are.

The terminal is powerful, yes...needed by the user, no. In fact this is still the biggest complaint about linux in general. To boot, this complaint could have, and should have been addressed long ago, but the self important nature of open source app developers, and I&#039;ll call it as I see it...the blatant last-mile laziness of devs to round off what is needed to use a modern OS for users has left us in the dark that is the terminal. 

Mint devs get this, but their numbers are few, yet they have managed to move this issue light years beyond all of their &#039;famous&#039; counterparts, shame on all of them for this, get with the program.

&quot;If you can’t enter a few simple commands into a virtual terminal with a browser open, then OSX is what you need.&quot; - The trouble with this argument is that it is almost NEVER a simple command, moreover, advice given for said commands once you wade thru the veiled insults, is rarely distro specific, and usually fails. Do you actually consider this a good way to do things this far along? C&#039;mon, nobody buys this claim anymore.

&quot;This review sounds like you couldn’t figure out screen0/screen1 and when Mint does it, BEST.DISTRO.EVER.&quot; - While I agree Mint is about the best I&#039;ve used, ever...the Xorg screen allocation is something beyond their control is is still a problem for many depending on the hardware used, and no, it&#039;s not an ATI/nVidia problem, it&#039;s Xorg&#039;s horridly sad infighting over basic functions leaving it crippled for so long that is to blame, try Googling &#039;why Xorg sucks&#039;, and you&#039;ll find enough info on that subject alone to do a dissertation. Mint got it as correctly as they could, is that now a bad thing? Software that just works for people without lifting the hood, has a grip on ergonomics. Why don&#039;t you go Google that for yourself, and get back to us?

&quot;RTFM and Google are absolutly the best advice you can give newbies to linux otherwise every kid who thinks using gnu/linux is ‘kewl’ would be screaming about how to do the simplest thing on the forums.&quot; - As mentioned above, there is NO UNIFIED MANUAL for linux...and most likely never will be, for many reasons.

So, your answer is a lazy-a$$ cop out, but hey, I bet you feel big when you tell someone that, regardless of their age, or willingness to learn.  I&#039;ve actually had 20+ yr experienced people tell me, BTW, AFTER Googling it themselves because they had no clue, that my problem was unsolvable due to one frankly BS reason or another....that most likely would be deemed an unacceptable reason for said stunted or broken function in the Win/OSX world. But I&#039;m sure that prompts yet another cop out response of, &quot;well if they work better use them&quot; meanwhile touting how awesome Linux is, and how we should try it.  Seems a tad self defeating to me.

Once again, the Mint crew have done a stellar job of making linux approachable and usable for ordinary users, and hats off to them for it, it&#039;s got to be one hell of an uphill battle, considering the lame attitudes of most of the linux elite communities, never mind the corrupted world of hardware manufacturers with their horrid support of Linux in general.

I recommend or install Mint at least twice a week to my customers who are interested in getting away from bloated MS OS&#039;s and for one reason or another don&#039;t like Apple. The Mint guys deserve all the support we can muster, not only for their efforts, but because out of the whole lot of Linux devs....they get it, they have a clue, and are willing to work towards a necessary goal.

Those more worried about the OS than their egos know it too, as evidenced in the &quot;Why Linux sucks&quot; YouTube spots, done by....you guessed it, Linux Developers themselves! At least they are trying to address it, whilst fanboys merely use it to feel better about all that lost time in a terminal when their peers use their comps to get done what they need done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aphex</p>
<p>&#8220;So heres the part where I say, its Free and its not ever meant to directly compete with Windows or OSX.&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;m sorry, Canonical and many others would argue with you on this one, whether you like it or not, Linux is being pushed as the third alternative, which obviously will attract new users, get over yourselves, your little clandestine nerd-world is breaking up. And another clue, &#8220;it&#8217;s free&#8221; is no excuse for unfinished, broken, missing pieces, or otherwise unusable for the greater part of users interested. period.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you don’t like the command-line why use gnu/linux? Its one of the best things about it.&#8221; &#8211; Absolutely wrong&#8230;the command line is both necessary, AND legacy&#8230;like 15 years legacy&#8230;it&#8217;s not the best thing about it by far. Two major player/groups are responsible for this with their inability to round off their GUI environments 15 or so years on, we all know who they are.</p>
<p>The terminal is powerful, yes&#8230;needed by the user, no. In fact this is still the biggest complaint about linux in general. To boot, this complaint could have, and should have been addressed long ago, but the self important nature of open source app developers, and I&#8217;ll call it as I see it&#8230;the blatant last-mile laziness of devs to round off what is needed to use a modern OS for users has left us in the dark that is the terminal. </p>
<p>Mint devs get this, but their numbers are few, yet they have managed to move this issue light years beyond all of their &#8216;famous&#8217; counterparts, shame on all of them for this, get with the program.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you can’t enter a few simple commands into a virtual terminal with a browser open, then OSX is what you need.&#8221; &#8211; The trouble with this argument is that it is almost NEVER a simple command, moreover, advice given for said commands once you wade thru the veiled insults, is rarely distro specific, and usually fails. Do you actually consider this a good way to do things this far along? C&#8217;mon, nobody buys this claim anymore.</p>
<p>&#8220;This review sounds like you couldn’t figure out screen0/screen1 and when Mint does it, BEST.DISTRO.EVER.&#8221; &#8211; While I agree Mint is about the best I&#8217;ve used, ever&#8230;the Xorg screen allocation is something beyond their control is is still a problem for many depending on the hardware used, and no, it&#8217;s not an ATI/nVidia problem, it&#8217;s Xorg&#8217;s horridly sad infighting over basic functions leaving it crippled for so long that is to blame, try Googling &#8216;why Xorg sucks&#8217;, and you&#8217;ll find enough info on that subject alone to do a dissertation. Mint got it as correctly as they could, is that now a bad thing? Software that just works for people without lifting the hood, has a grip on ergonomics. Why don&#8217;t you go Google that for yourself, and get back to us?</p>
<p>&#8220;RTFM and Google are absolutly the best advice you can give newbies to linux otherwise every kid who thinks using gnu/linux is ‘kewl’ would be screaming about how to do the simplest thing on the forums.&#8221; &#8211; As mentioned above, there is NO UNIFIED MANUAL for linux&#8230;and most likely never will be, for many reasons.</p>
<p>So, your answer is a lazy-a$$ cop out, but hey, I bet you feel big when you tell someone that, regardless of their age, or willingness to learn.  I&#8217;ve actually had 20+ yr experienced people tell me, BTW, AFTER Googling it themselves because they had no clue, that my problem was unsolvable due to one frankly BS reason or another&#8230;.that most likely would be deemed an unacceptable reason for said stunted or broken function in the Win/OSX world. But I&#8217;m sure that prompts yet another cop out response of, &#8220;well if they work better use them&#8221; meanwhile touting how awesome Linux is, and how we should try it.  Seems a tad self defeating to me.</p>
<p>Once again, the Mint crew have done a stellar job of making linux approachable and usable for ordinary users, and hats off to them for it, it&#8217;s got to be one hell of an uphill battle, considering the lame attitudes of most of the linux elite communities, never mind the corrupted world of hardware manufacturers with their horrid support of Linux in general.</p>
<p>I recommend or install Mint at least twice a week to my customers who are interested in getting away from bloated MS OS&#8217;s and for one reason or another don&#8217;t like Apple. The Mint guys deserve all the support we can muster, not only for their efforts, but because out of the whole lot of Linux devs&#8230;.they get it, they have a clue, and are willing to work towards a necessary goal.</p>
<p>Those more worried about the OS than their egos know it too, as evidenced in the &#8220;Why Linux sucks&#8221; YouTube spots, done by&#8230;.you guessed it, Linux Developers themselves! At least they are trying to address it, whilst fanboys merely use it to feel better about all that lost time in a terminal when their peers use their comps to get done what they need done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/comment-page-1/#comment-14083</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 18:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/#comment-14083</guid>
		<description>Shortcuts... Right click and edit your menu button. go to &#039;system/preferences....&#039; and when you get to the &#039;keyboard shortcuts&#039; icon, do a right click and &#039;properties/launcher&#039;. Now you&#039;ll see it&#039;s really called &#039;gnome-keybinding-properties&#039; - Just for fun, open a terminal and type &#039;gnome-keybi&#039; and press tab... then enter... find the action for &#039;show the panel menu&#039;. I disabled the alternative (I don&#039;t need to use Alt+Space to bring up the window menu, so I clicked that and pressed &#039;backspace&#039; so that it read Disabled).

Try pressing ALT+F2 and launching gnome-control-center
There&#039;s the same keyboard settings icon.... but also you can go from there click &#039;advanced settings manager&#039; (or ALT+F2 &#039;ccsm&#039;).
From there, click &#039;General&#039; and find the place to set &#039;commands&#039; and &#039;keybindings&#039;. Now you can change just about Anything to do just about Anything you can think of at a keystroke, combination of keystroke, mouse button, mousebutton and screen area combination - wow. For your menu, how about you put the mouse in the bottom left and click RMB? no need to put our mouse on the icon. Set it to open like this AND using Alt Space.

Now do that in Windows :P

I prefer the ubuntu loading screen (black) but agree, Mint is fairly nice - and the desktop looks more like Windows (only one bar and menu at the bottom). Basicallly, it&#039;s the same - gnome desktop usually has a bar at top and bottom. Bottom is for window selection, and easily deleted. Top easily set to autohide so that you have NO visible menu until you press &#039;ALT+F1/F2/F3, only now I set it to open the menu with Alt+Space...
All the &#039;mint&#039; stuff is debian, and I tried it out with ubuntu. The menu is a rebadged &#039;SLAB&#039; which nobody really liked until Mint came along (it&#039;s all hype - SLAB isn&#039;t anything new, it was left off, with the space saving &#039;main menu&#039; available, but the &#039;menu bar&#039; on the top left corner instead. Do a search, there are many floating around, but generally it&#039;s best to get away from using the menu&#039;s - isn&#039;t that the best thing that Vista did for everyone?

Within an hour or two, you&#039;ll have customised it - it&#039;s already more different from the original than the choice between Mint and ubuntu - but the ubuntu logo has more credibility, the African and Human echo&#039;s make it seem a little more friendly. Minty fresh is an old idea, &#039;fresh&#039; is rather corny, a little like &#039;Amazing new Vista, with the Amazing 3D flip&#039;.

I&#039;m using gnome/ubuntu, with innotek virtualbox giving me a fullscreen XP desktop on one workspace (sometimes integrated wherever I&#039;m working) and possibly Vista on another. I have a dualboot option also for XP, so I can play my windows games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shortcuts&#8230; Right click and edit your menu button. go to &#8217;system/preferences&#8230;.&#8217; and when you get to the &#8216;keyboard shortcuts&#8217; icon, do a right click and &#8216;properties/launcher&#8217;. Now you&#8217;ll see it&#8217;s really called &#8216;gnome-keybinding-properties&#8217; &#8211; Just for fun, open a terminal and type &#8216;gnome-keybi&#8217; and press tab&#8230; then enter&#8230; find the action for &#8217;show the panel menu&#8217;. I disabled the alternative (I don&#8217;t need to use Alt+Space to bring up the window menu, so I clicked that and pressed &#8216;backspace&#8217; so that it read Disabled).</p>
<p>Try pressing ALT+F2 and launching gnome-control-center<br />
There&#8217;s the same keyboard settings icon&#8230;. but also you can go from there click &#8216;advanced settings manager&#8217; (or ALT+F2 &#8216;ccsm&#8217;).<br />
From there, click &#8216;General&#8217; and find the place to set &#8216;commands&#8217; and &#8216;keybindings&#8217;. Now you can change just about Anything to do just about Anything you can think of at a keystroke, combination of keystroke, mouse button, mousebutton and screen area combination &#8211; wow. For your menu, how about you put the mouse in the bottom left and click RMB? no need to put our mouse on the icon. Set it to open like this AND using Alt Space.</p>
<p>Now do that in Windows <img src='http://www.pcmech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I prefer the ubuntu loading screen (black) but agree, Mint is fairly nice &#8211; and the desktop looks more like Windows (only one bar and menu at the bottom). Basicallly, it&#8217;s the same &#8211; gnome desktop usually has a bar at top and bottom. Bottom is for window selection, and easily deleted. Top easily set to autohide so that you have NO visible menu until you press &#8216;ALT+F1/F2/F3, only now I set it to open the menu with Alt+Space&#8230;<br />
All the &#8216;mint&#8217; stuff is debian, and I tried it out with ubuntu. The menu is a rebadged &#8216;SLAB&#8217; which nobody really liked until Mint came along (it&#8217;s all hype &#8211; SLAB isn&#8217;t anything new, it was left off, with the space saving &#8216;main menu&#8217; available, but the &#8216;menu bar&#8217; on the top left corner instead. Do a search, there are many floating around, but generally it&#8217;s best to get away from using the menu&#8217;s &#8211; isn&#8217;t that the best thing that Vista did for everyone?</p>
<p>Within an hour or two, you&#8217;ll have customised it &#8211; it&#8217;s already more different from the original than the choice between Mint and ubuntu &#8211; but the ubuntu logo has more credibility, the African and Human echo&#8217;s make it seem a little more friendly. Minty fresh is an old idea, &#8216;fresh&#8217; is rather corny, a little like &#8216;Amazing new Vista, with the Amazing 3D flip&#8217;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using gnome/ubuntu, with innotek virtualbox giving me a fullscreen XP desktop on one workspace (sometimes integrated wherever I&#8217;m working) and possibly Vista on another. I have a dualboot option also for XP, so I can play my windows games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Menga</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/comment-page-1/#comment-8174</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Menga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/#comment-8174</guid>
		<description>Yes and no. You can configure it to launch a &quot;floating&quot; applications menu which holds the same contents as the Mint menu, but I was not able to get the Super key to launch the from-taskbar Mint menu itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and no. You can configure it to launch a &#8220;floating&#8221; applications menu which holds the same contents as the Mint menu, but I was not able to get the Super key to launch the from-taskbar Mint menu itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/comment-page-1/#comment-8128</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/#comment-8128</guid>
		<description>In your comment about using the &quot;Super Key&quot; alone to launch your applications menu, does that mean it launches the custom &quot;mintmenu&quot; (which pops up when you click the logo in the lower left corner)?  I can&#039;t for the life of me figure out how to map the super key to open the mint menu, and the mint forums haven&#039;t been any help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your comment about using the &#8220;Super Key&#8221; alone to launch your applications menu, does that mean it launches the custom &#8220;mintmenu&#8221; (which pops up when you click the logo in the lower left corner)?  I can&#8217;t for the life of me figure out how to map the super key to open the mint menu, and the mint forums haven&#8217;t been any help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OSX User</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/comment-page-1/#comment-8019</link>
		<dc:creator>OSX User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/#comment-8019</guid>
		<description>LOL @ Noob Linux users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL @ Noob Linux users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aphex</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/comment-page-1/#comment-7717</link>
		<dc:creator>Aphex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/#comment-7717</guid>
		<description>Ok,

So heres the part where I say, its Free and its not ever meant to directly compete with Windows or OSX.  If you don&#039;t like the command-line why use gnu/linux?  Its one of the best things about it.

If you can&#039;t enter a few simple commands into a virtual terminal with a browser open, then OSX is what you need.  This review sounds like you couldn&#039;t figure out screen0/screen1 and when Mint does it, BEST.DISTRO.EVER.

gimme a break.  News just in: Linux  provides free butter!!  BEST.Distro.EvER!!! 

RTFM and Google are absolutly the best advice you can give newbies to linux otherwise every kid who thinks using gnu/linux is &#039;kewl&#039; would be screaming about how to do the simplest thing on the forums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok,</p>
<p>So heres the part where I say, its Free and its not ever meant to directly compete with Windows or OSX.  If you don&#8217;t like the command-line why use gnu/linux?  Its one of the best things about it.</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t enter a few simple commands into a virtual terminal with a browser open, then OSX is what you need.  This review sounds like you couldn&#8217;t figure out screen0/screen1 and when Mint does it, BEST.DISTRO.EVER.</p>
<p>gimme a break.  News just in: Linux  provides free butter!!  BEST.Distro.EvER!!! </p>
<p>RTFM and Google are absolutly the best advice you can give newbies to linux otherwise every kid who thinks using gnu/linux is &#8216;kewl&#8217; would be screaming about how to do the simplest thing on the forums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kDest</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/comment-page-1/#comment-7507</link>
		<dc:creator>kDest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/#comment-7507</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to point out the reason that many Linux distros, including Ubuntu avoid having codecs and full dvd accessibility.

Many codecs are patented, and Linux cannot in most countries legally play the dvds you buy at stores. libdvdcss (I believe its current name is) is illegal in most countries that respect copyright law and also have some variant of the DMCA (though one can argue the main reason that the backers of CSS enforce this law against it is because they wish to sell a license to everybody who would play dvds to decode them).

It&#039;s basically to avoid litigation. As for the dual screen and flash animations, I agree it would be nicer if Linux had these easier to config, but again it&#039;s probably a patent issue, copyright issue, or closed source issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to point out the reason that many Linux distros, including Ubuntu avoid having codecs and full dvd accessibility.</p>
<p>Many codecs are patented, and Linux cannot in most countries legally play the dvds you buy at stores. libdvdcss (I believe its current name is) is illegal in most countries that respect copyright law and also have some variant of the DMCA (though one can argue the main reason that the backers of CSS enforce this law against it is because they wish to sell a license to everybody who would play dvds to decode them).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s basically to avoid litigation. As for the dual screen and flash animations, I agree it would be nicer if Linux had these easier to config, but again it&#8217;s probably a patent issue, copyright issue, or closed source issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyle</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/comment-page-1/#comment-7351</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/#comment-7351</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard of Mint before, but like you, I&#039;ve always just thought of it as another &quot;knockoff&quot;.  I enjoy using Ubuntu, however I usually end up getting frustrated with it for some reason or another...usually having to do with something video related (I too use a NVidia card).  Maybe I&#039;ll have to give this a try and see if it works better.  It would be nice to have some of this stuff work right out of the box for once.  The out of the box dual monitor support is also intruiging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard of Mint before, but like you, I&#8217;ve always just thought of it as another &#8220;knockoff&#8221;.  I enjoy using Ubuntu, however I usually end up getting frustrated with it for some reason or another&#8230;usually having to do with something video related (I too use a NVidia card).  Maybe I&#8217;ll have to give this a try and see if it works better.  It would be nice to have some of this stuff work right out of the box for once.  The out of the box dual monitor support is also intruiging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux Mint, The Ubuntu That Should Have Been? Part 2 &#187; PC Mechanic</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/comment-page-1/#comment-7344</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux Mint, The Ubuntu That Should Have Been? Part 2 &#187; PC Mechanic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/linux-mint-the-ubuntu-that-should-have-been/#comment-7344</guid>
		<description>[...] read in part 1 that I was having that all-too-familiar dual-screen b.s. where the Desktop Effects didn&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read in part 1 that I was having that all-too-familiar dual-screen b.s. where the Desktop Effects didn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
