Live Example Of Firefox 4 Memory Problems

It’s well known that the Firefox has had memory-releasing issues ever since version 2 of the browser, and with 4 it doesn’t appear that the problems have been resolved.

I want to make clear that Fx isn’t a bad browser, but it does eat up tons of memory that requires restarting it frequently whereas you don’t have to do that with IE9 or Chrome.

Mozilla has tried to pin the blame on add-ons for the slow performance of Firefox, but seriously, Mozilla, we’re not buying it. The browser is a memory-munching monster and we all know it.

A pretty damning example of how bad Fx is when it comes to memory use is that I came across a Reddit thread that stated, “If you go to [this] web site, the browser will explode in memory use and/or crash your computer.” I have 8GB of RAM in my system so I tried it out.

See for yourself what happened:

Opt In Image
Free Weekly PCMech Newsletter
Almost 500 Issues So Far, Received By Thousands Every Week.

The PCMech.com weekly newsletter has been running strong for over 8 years. Sign up to get tech news, updates and exclusive content - right in your inbox. Also get (several) free gifts.

Comments

  1. Campana3022 says:

    http://www.mapcrunch.com/gallery, loads fine on an iPad 2. On a MacBook Pro, uses a little over 500MB with Safari and about 120 MB with Chrome. Uses over 1.0 GB with Firefox on the Mac.

  2. Your Right FireFox Memory Leak Problem Is Horrible.

    With FF3.6 I Would Routinely Use Up To 1.5GB With About 10 To 12 Tabs.

    FF4 Isn’t Much Better, Now It’s Just Below 1GB For About 15 Tabs

    While With Google Chrome, I’m Looking At About 200MB With 50 Tabs Open

Leave a Reply

PCMech Insider Cover Images - Subscribe To Get Your Copies!
Learn More
Tech Information you can use, sent to your inbox each and every week. Check out PCMech's digital e-zine...