<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Megahertz Myth: Why Clock Rate Is Unreliable.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/megahertz-myth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/megahertz-myth/</link> <description>Tech Powered Life... Simplified</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 03:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/megahertz-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-76255</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=14112#comment-76255</guid> <description>Hey guys, sorry about the long response time. Seems this article&#039;s been getting quite a few responses. I&#039;ll do my best to respond to each one individually.First things first: for everyone saying the article is incomplete, I&#039;ll be posting a follow up to it some time in the near future (unfortunately, I&#039;ve no direct control over when my articles go live).  </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, sorry about the long response time. Seems this article&#8217;s been getting quite a few responses. I&#8217;ll do my best to respond to each one individually.</p><p>First things first: for everyone saying the article is incomplete, I&#8217;ll be posting a follow up to it some time in the near future (unfortunately, I&#8217;ve no direct control over when my articles go live).  </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Reidwicks</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/megahertz-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-76246</link> <dc:creator>Reidwicks</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=14112#comment-76246</guid> <description>Then how DO we know which is better?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then how DO we know which is better?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ifgliyg iug;iugb</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/megahertz-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-76244</link> <dc:creator>ifgliyg iug;iugb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 03:56:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=14112#comment-76244</guid> <description>Article warns that it is going to be technical, I get excited, and am now very disappointed at learning precisely, nothing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article warns that it is going to be technical, I get excited, and am now very disappointed at learning precisely, nothing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pete</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/megahertz-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-76241</link> <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=14112#comment-76241</guid> <description>Sorry, I meant &quot;concrete&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I meant &#8220;concrete&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pete</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/megahertz-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-76240</link> <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=14112#comment-76240</guid> <description>Please expand this article with concret examples.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please expand this article with concret examples.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sixty Some</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/megahertz-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-76238</link> <dc:creator>Sixty Some</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=14112#comment-76238</guid> <description>So many factors involved.
Good article to get you thinking.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many factors involved.<br
/> Good article to get you thinking.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Maya2blue</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/megahertz-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-76237</link> <dc:creator>Maya2blue</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=14112#comment-76237</guid> <description>article starts, then stops..   ??????</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>article starts, then stops..   ??????</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MartYn</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/megahertz-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-76210</link> <dc:creator>MartYn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=14112#comment-76210</guid> <description>I agree with Andrew. How about some product examples etc. This article seems to just get started then ends :-/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Andrew. How about some product examples etc. This article seems to just get started then ends :-/</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David M</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/megahertz-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-76209</link> <dc:creator>David M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=14112#comment-76209</guid> <description>Cycles actually USED to be a pretty good way of determining the amount of work a processor could do many years ago when they were much the same.CPU&#039;s now do different amounts of work and different types of work per cycle.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cycles actually USED to be a pretty good way of determining the amount of work a processor could do many years ago when they were much the same.</p><p>CPU&#8217;s now do different amounts of work and different types of work per cycle.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/megahertz-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-76208</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:26:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=14112#comment-76208</guid> <description>This article is incomplete.  It should just be starting where it ends.  The simile is nice, but how about relating it back to how processors compare to one another.  The whole &quot;half the time, but same work&quot; bit sounded like a comparison between a 64 and 32 bit processor.  Also I can&#039;t help but nitpick that 2 GHz is not the rate at which the computer completes a single cycle.  It means 2e9 cycles are are completed per second.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is incomplete.  It should just be starting where it ends.  The simile is nice, but how about relating it back to how processors compare to one another.  The whole &#8220;half the time, but same work&#8221; bit sounded like a comparison between a 64 and 32 bit processor.  Also I can&#8217;t help but nitpick that 2 GHz is not the rate at which the computer completes a single cycle.  It means 2e9 cycles are are completed per second.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 39/58 queries in 0.029 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.pcmech.com @ 2013-02-12 05:33:41 --