<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Never Defragment a Flash Drive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/never-defragment-flash-drive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/never-defragment-flash-drive/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:37:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/never-defragment-flash-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-15990</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=8274#comment-15990</guid>
		<description>Great article.

I was recently designing an on-board memory controller using flash cards, and I was surprised to see that the maximum lifetime &quot;writes&quot; for any given card was about 100,000 to 300,000.  This is a large number... but no sense chewing up thousands per defragment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.</p>
<p>I was recently designing an on-board memory controller using flash cards, and I was surprised to see that the maximum lifetime &#8220;writes&#8221; for any given card was about 100,000 to 300,000.  This is a large number&#8230; but no sense chewing up thousands per defragment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
