<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Open Source Tool To Split And Merge PDF Files</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/open-source-tool-to-split-and-merge-pdf-files/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/open-source-tool-to-split-and-merge-pdf-files/</link> <description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Simone Santini</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/open-source-tool-to-split-and-merge-pdf-files/comment-page-1/#comment-37179</link> <dc:creator>Simone Santini</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:53:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10282#comment-37179</guid> <description>Your program is frustrating. Very useful, but the source code is exceltionally poorly structured and basically uncommented. Terrible code to analyze.I was also wondering why you chose to code the it in Java. Most of the classes have basically no invariant, which makes them haphazard collecions of function. It seems that a structured language such as C would have been a better choice: you could have done the same job in about half the lines, without all the incomprehensible overstructured that Java forces you to use.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your program is frustrating. Very useful, but the source code is exceltionally poorly structured and basically uncommented. Terrible code to analyze.</p><p>I was also wondering why you chose to code the it in Java. Most of the classes have basically no invariant, which makes them haphazard collecions of function. It seems that a structured language such as C would have been a better choice: you could have done the same job in about half the lines, without all the incomprehensible overstructured that Java forces you to use.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SAP</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/open-source-tool-to-split-and-merge-pdf-files/comment-page-1/#comment-31992</link> <dc:creator>SAP</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:12:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=10282#comment-31992</guid> <description>For a command-line tool which can do much the same, see PDFTK, e.g.:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pdftk</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a command-line tool which can do much the same, see PDFTK, e.g.:</p><p><a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pdftk" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pdftk</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 33/43 queries in 0.018 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.pcmech.com @ 2012-02-15 14:19:39 -->
