<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimize Windows Virtual Memory Settings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/optimize-windows-virtual-memory-settings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/optimize-windows-virtual-memory-settings/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:17:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ajay</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/optimize-windows-virtual-memory-settings/comment-page-1/#comment-34934</link>
		<dc:creator>ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1993574405#comment-34934</guid>
		<description>I originally had 256 MB DDR and I upgraded the ram to 512 MB (256 MB + 512 MB =768 MB). When I installed window XP sp2 after installation XP system reboot automatically and showing a virtual memory error message. Can you resolve the problem any one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I originally had 256 MB DDR and I upgraded the ram to 512 MB (256 MB + 512 MB =768 MB). When I installed window XP sp2 after installation XP system reboot automatically and showing a virtual memory error message. Can you resolve the problem any one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soldier1st</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/optimize-windows-virtual-memory-settings/comment-page-1/#comment-32703</link>
		<dc:creator>Soldier1st</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1993574405#comment-32703</guid>
		<description>Even if you add more memory the hard drive will still be used just not as much so it&#039;s better to keep the safety net so just incase, and setting it to the same size might reduce pagefile fragmentation it will limit the pagefiles growth so if it does need to grow then a static size will prevent it, if you ask me it would be best to either leave it at default or set it to system managed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if you add more memory the hard drive will still be used just not as much so it&#8217;s better to keep the safety net so just incase, and setting it to the same size might reduce pagefile fragmentation it will limit the pagefiles growth so if it does need to grow then a static size will prevent it, if you ask me it would be best to either leave it at default or set it to system managed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon doe</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/optimize-windows-virtual-memory-settings/comment-page-1/#comment-31356</link>
		<dc:creator>jon doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1993574405#comment-31356</guid>
		<description>WOW... I have a ram monitior/OPTIMIZER and I did as &quot;stated&quot; above and I could not optimize my system more than  512mb with only 1GB of PC2700 ddr2 sdram plus 128mb including my Gforce AGP 3D graphics card. I set my min and max @ 2000 each and was able to optimize @ 92% while running progs in the backround!! But I do recomend you defrag!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW&#8230; I have a ram monitior/OPTIMIZER and I did as &#8220;stated&#8221; above and I could not optimize my system more than  512mb with only 1GB of PC2700 ddr2 sdram plus 128mb including my Gforce AGP 3D graphics card. I set my min and max @ 2000 each and was able to optimize @ 92% while running progs in the backround!! But I do recomend you defrag!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Runaway1956</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/optimize-windows-virtual-memory-settings/comment-page-1/#comment-25785</link>
		<dc:creator>Runaway1956</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1993574405#comment-25785</guid>
		<description>Apologies - I posted before stipulating that I was only talking about 32 bit systems.  With 64 bit systems - simply double the numbers for MINIMUM RECOMMENDED MEMORY on any given machine.  Selling any 64 bit machine with less than 4 GB of memory is reprehensible.  4 GB should be minimum for the home user who will never use his machine for anything more intensive than editing a few family photos.  8 GB should be minimum for power users of 64 bit machines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies &#8211; I posted before stipulating that I was only talking about 32 bit systems.  With 64 bit systems &#8211; simply double the numbers for MINIMUM RECOMMENDED MEMORY on any given machine.  Selling any 64 bit machine with less than 4 GB of memory is reprehensible.  4 GB should be minimum for the home user who will never use his machine for anything more intensive than editing a few family photos.  8 GB should be minimum for power users of 64 bit machines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Runaway1956</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/optimize-windows-virtual-memory-settings/comment-page-1/#comment-25784</link>
		<dc:creator>Runaway1956</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1993574405#comment-25784</guid>
		<description>Actually - the BEST WAY to avoid paging file problems, is to INSTALL MEMORY!!!  OEM&#039;s are guilty of cutting corners on memory, to get the lowest priced machines, and Microsoft allows them to get away with it.  This is all based on ill thought out &quot;minimum ram&quot; recommendations.  Windows XP should have had a MINIMUM of 512 MB with 1 GB recommended for normal home use, 2 GB for power users.  Windows Vista and Windows 7 should have a 2 GB recommended for normal home use, and 4 GB for power users.

Now that you have enough memory installed, install Windows and allow it to set default virtual memory sizes.  Go into the settings, look at the minimum recommended size for the swap file, and double that for the minimum, use the same number for the maximum.  

Let&#039;s get past the niggardly OEM&#039;s trying to save a couple dollars, thereby selling substandard machines, and the swap file becomes a much less important consideration for most users.  Special cases will arise, of course - that&#039;s what the IT guy is for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually &#8211; the BEST WAY to avoid paging file problems, is to INSTALL MEMORY!!!  OEM&#8217;s are guilty of cutting corners on memory, to get the lowest priced machines, and Microsoft allows them to get away with it.  This is all based on ill thought out &#8220;minimum ram&#8221; recommendations.  Windows XP should have had a MINIMUM of 512 MB with 1 GB recommended for normal home use, 2 GB for power users.  Windows Vista and Windows 7 should have a 2 GB recommended for normal home use, and 4 GB for power users.</p>
<p>Now that you have enough memory installed, install Windows and allow it to set default virtual memory sizes.  Go into the settings, look at the minimum recommended size for the swap file, and double that for the minimum, use the same number for the maximum.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get past the niggardly OEM&#8217;s trying to save a couple dollars, thereby selling substandard machines, and the swap file becomes a much less important consideration for most users.  Special cases will arise, of course &#8211; that&#8217;s what the IT guy is for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/optimize-windows-virtual-memory-settings/comment-page-1/#comment-17196</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1993574405#comment-17196</guid>
		<description>WARNING: BAD ADVICE

By default Windows sets the initial size of the pagefile to 1.5 times the size of physical memory or 2GB, whichever is less. But this is with the assumption that the pagefile is allowed to grow if this is needed. If this is prevented, as the author suggests, you risk severe performance degradation or a system crash. The default settings prevent this.

A better way to prevent pagefile resizing is to increase the initial size so that it will never (or rarely) be necessary. When this is done you have a fixed pagefile for all practical purposes. Always set the maximum size to at least twice the initial size. This gives a safety net in case you guess wrong about the initial size. After a reboot (or sooner) t pagefile will revert to it;s initial unfragmented state. There is no reason not avail yourself of this safety net. 

Larry Miller
Microsoft MCSA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WARNING: BAD ADVICE</p>
<p>By default Windows sets the initial size of the pagefile to 1.5 times the size of physical memory or 2GB, whichever is less. But this is with the assumption that the pagefile is allowed to grow if this is needed. If this is prevented, as the author suggests, you risk severe performance degradation or a system crash. The default settings prevent this.</p>
<p>A better way to prevent pagefile resizing is to increase the initial size so that it will never (or rarely) be necessary. When this is done you have a fixed pagefile for all practical purposes. Always set the maximum size to at least twice the initial size. This gives a safety net in case you guess wrong about the initial size. After a reboot (or sooner) t pagefile will revert to it;s initial unfragmented state. There is no reason not avail yourself of this safety net. </p>
<p>Larry Miller<br />
Microsoft MCSA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rocio</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/optimize-windows-virtual-memory-settings/comment-page-1/#comment-16100</link>
		<dc:creator>rocio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1993574405#comment-16100</guid>
		<description>If you have enough memory you can disable your page file at all. It will increase performance more then defrag them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have enough memory you can disable your page file at all. It will increase performance more then defrag them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ernest cianfrani</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/optimize-windows-virtual-memory-settings/comment-page-1/#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>ernest cianfrani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1993574405#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>hey it was right on thank you for your help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey it was right on thank you for your help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
