<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcast 10-22-2207 : Is It Worth It To Have 64-bit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/podcast-10-22-2207-is-it-worth-it-to-have-64-bit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/podcast-10-22-2207-is-it-worth-it-to-have-64-bit/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tadeh Davtian</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/podcast-10-22-2207-is-it-worth-it-to-have-64-bit/comment-page-1/#comment-5334</link>
		<dc:creator>Tadeh Davtian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 11:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/podcast-10-22-2207-is-it-worth-it-to-have-64-bit/#comment-5334</guid>
		<description>Yes we definitly need 64 bit technology.
We are developing internet2 applications.

Internet2 URL addresses are like this;
****************************************************************://****************************************************************.****************************************************************/****************************************************************/****************************************************************.****************************************************************
Where * is appropriate single character (alphabet, number, symbol)

http://marssoftsearch.com/error404.asp
This error404.asp file will browse URL

Take this URL as an example;
http://web.search.yahoo.com/search/options

1)
http://marssoftsearch.com/error404.asp?url=http://web.search.yahoo.com/search/options
for
http://web.search.yahoo.com/search/options
2)
http://marssoftsearch.com/error404.asp?url=http://web.search.yahoo.com.c/search/options
for
http://web.search.yahoo.com.c/search/options
3)
http://marssoftsearch.com/error404.asp?url=http://web.search.yahoo.com.marssoftsearch.com/search/options
for
http://web.search.yahoo.com.marssoftsearch.com/search/options
4)
http://marssoftsearch.com/error404.asp?url=http://web.search.yahoo.com.c.marssoftsearch.com/search/options
for
http://web.search.yahoo.com.c.marssoftsearch.com/search/options
The URL generator and URL crawler is using matrices.
With 64 bit technology matrice elements can have up to 64 characters.
Dual core processor will be in use for domain and subdomain, and more cores means more subsubdomains calculations...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes we definitly need 64 bit technology.<br />
We are developing internet2 applications.</p>
<p>Internet2 URL addresses are like this;<br />
****************************************************************://****************************************************************.****************************************************************/****************************************************************/****************************************************************.****************************************************************<br />
Where * is appropriate single character (alphabet, number, symbol)</p>
<p><a href="http://marssoftsearch.com/error404.asp" rel="nofollow">http://marssoftsearch.com/error404.asp</a><br />
This error404.asp file will browse URL</p>
<p>Take this URL as an example;<br />
<a href="http://web.search.yahoo.com/search/options" rel="nofollow">http://web.search.yahoo.com/search/options</a></p>
<p>1)<br />
<a href="http://marssoftsearch.com/error404.asp?url=http://web.search.yahoo.com/search/options" rel="nofollow">http://marssoftsearch.com/error404.asp?url=http://web.search.yahoo.com/search/options</a><br />
for<br />
<a href="http://web.search.yahoo.com/search/options" rel="nofollow">http://web.search.yahoo.com/search/options</a><br />
2)<br />
<a href="http://marssoftsearch.com/error404.asp?url=http://web.search.yahoo.com.c/search/options" rel="nofollow">http://marssoftsearch.com/error404.asp?url=http://web.search.yahoo.com.c/search/options</a><br />
for<br />
<a href="http://web.search.yahoo.com.c/search/options" rel="nofollow">http://web.search.yahoo.com.c/search/options</a><br />
3)<br />
<a href="http://marssoftsearch.com/error404.asp?url=http://web.search.yahoo.com.marssoftsearch.com/search/options" rel="nofollow">http://marssoftsearch.com/error404.asp?url=http://web.search.yahoo.com.marssoftsearch.com/search/options</a><br />
for<br />
<a href="http://web.search.yahoo.com.marssoftsearch.com/search/options" rel="nofollow">http://web.search.yahoo.com.marssoftsearch.com/search/options</a><br />
4)<br />
<a href="http://marssoftsearch.com/error404.asp?url=http://web.search.yahoo.com.c.marssoftsearch.com/search/options" rel="nofollow">http://marssoftsearch.com/error404.asp?url=http://web.search.yahoo.com.c.marssoftsearch.com/search/options</a><br />
for<br />
<a href="http://web.search.yahoo.com.c.marssoftsearch.com/search/options" rel="nofollow">http://web.search.yahoo.com.c.marssoftsearch.com/search/options</a><br />
The URL generator and URL crawler is using matrices.<br />
With 64 bit technology matrice elements can have up to 64 characters.<br />
Dual core processor will be in use for domain and subdomain, and more cores means more subsubdomains calculations&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/podcast-10-22-2207-is-it-worth-it-to-have-64-bit/comment-page-1/#comment-3931</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 03:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/podcast-10-22-2207-is-it-worth-it-to-have-64-bit/#comment-3931</guid>
		<description>I actually have 64 bit Windows Vista. I actually have ran 32 bit and 64 bit on my system.  I actually saw a great difference in speed and resources.  The 64 bit version uses more resources, but it also allows for more.  I have 4GB of ram and it sits idle around 1.6GB.  That sucks, but that is why I have 4GB.  32 bit would sit idle around 750MB, but it didn&#039;t recognize all of my ram- instead of 4GB it only showed 2.5.  The speed in which all applications would actually run smoother and faster- so much faster.  Unlike 32 bit, 64 bit is allowed to use more resources to get the job done.  I would recomend 64 bit to anyone- but know that there are less programs and drivers for 64 bit systems.  Usually you can find them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually have 64 bit Windows Vista. I actually have ran 32 bit and 64 bit on my system.  I actually saw a great difference in speed and resources.  The 64 bit version uses more resources, but it also allows for more.  I have 4GB of ram and it sits idle around 1.6GB.  That sucks, but that is why I have 4GB.  32 bit would sit idle around 750MB, but it didn&#8217;t recognize all of my ram- instead of 4GB it only showed 2.5.  The speed in which all applications would actually run smoother and faster- so much faster.  Unlike 32 bit, 64 bit is allowed to use more resources to get the job done.  I would recomend 64 bit to anyone- but know that there are less programs and drivers for 64 bit systems.  Usually you can find them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
