Something that continually makes an appearance in modern gaming (usually with larger titles) are Easter eggs that feature some sort of retro computing thing. Maybe it’s an interface, maybe it’s a whole mini-system of sorts, etc.
Here’s an example of retro in a modern game:
With the non-gaming stuff we do with computers, as much as the industry tries to get us to use everything with a totally modernized look, time and time again people will revert back to super-simple means of using a computer interface.
For example, there are many (hundreds of?) thousands of users who will go into their Windows settings and purposely turn OFF all menu animations and fading because it’s simply not necessary. The fading in particular can get annoying quickly because it adds in needless time to display something that should be instant, such as a "Save Document? [Y]es, [N]o, [C]ancel" dialog box.
For those wondering if you can do that in Windows 7, yes you can. In fact you can make the whole Win7 UI look almost exactly like Win2000 if you wanted to.
A "computery" interface can also lend itself to fonts as well. Some people absolutely can’t stand anti-aliased fonts in any form, so when they see an anti-aliased font like this:
![]()
…they’ll purposely turn that off to show this instead:
![]()
I do have to admit that there are times when the aliased look, as jagged and "ugly" as it may appear, is easier to read at times simply for the fact that computery-looking fonts feel more comfortable on view; I can’t explain it any better than that.
As a small side note: Linux is the only environment that has desktop UIs that do fonts right, because you can set which size fonts go from aliased to anti-aliased.
Using a small Windows font as an example, Tahoma in 8pt size is easier to read aliased compared to anti-aliased.
Anti-aliased:
![]()
Aliased:
![]()
On a Linux desktop, you could for example instruct the desktop UI (in settings) to "only show aliased fonts at any point size below 9", and it will do it. Windows doesn’t do that, and to the best of my knowledge, Mac doesn’t either although I could be wrong there.
Given the all-or-nothing choice for aliasing in Windows, there are many who opt just to turn all the anti-aliasing off.
Do you like your fonts and menus computery? Or do you like the modern smooth and anti-aliased look?
Personally, I ride the fence on this one and really can’t answer with a definitive yes or no. When the fonts and menus bug me with the smoothness in Win7, I just open up a VMWare session of Windows 2000 to get my retro fix.
What about you?

Like what you read?
If so, please join over 28,000 people who receive our exclusive weekly newsletter and computer tips, and get FREE COPIES of 5 eBooks we created, as our gift to you for subscribing. Just enter your name and email below:



I’m not sure I really agree: the tiny Windows font is a lot easier to read for me when it is anti-aliased than aliased!
Some people prefer the anti-aliased font look for the small stuff, so that’s a-okay.
The non-anti-aliased large font is very ugly to me, and always has been. On the other hand the non-anti-aliased small font is much easier for me to read, while the anti-aliased small font looks blurry and annoying. I never really realized this until you pointed it out.
You can sorta/kinda get around the small-font anti-aliased thing in Windows with a web browser by using the anti-aliasing tuner for Firefox, but only if you use the Fx browser. If I remember correctly, that does allow for fonts to go aliased by size (i.e. “show aliased when font size goes below 12px” or whatever you set as the point where font smoothing is turned off).
In the Command Prompt, fortunately there is still the option to choose True/OpenType or Raster. The raster fonts are all aliased and is what Windows (even Win7) uses by default.