Do You Pay Fully Featured Programs Or Go With A Lesser Freebie?
By Jason Faulkner on Oct 26, 2009 in Daily Tips, Freeware, Software | comments(15)
Today’s tip is more of an open question.
My thought is typically to go with the lesser freebie. For the most part, commercial packages do offer more, but I typically don’t really need it. For example, I swapped from Quicken to GNU Cash about 2 years ago and I haven’t looked back. Quicken has a fancy interface and a bunch of wizards, but I found I just preferred a simple register view which GNU Cash does very well.
Additionally, for tool/utility programs, freebies almost always do what I need. Notepad++, Keepass, CutePDF, Sysinternals, Winpatrol, etc. are pretty top-notch in my opinion so I can’t see any compelling reason to pay for something which does basically the same thing. I don’t use tech support (I prefer to Google it), so that isn’t even a consideration.
Now there are a couple of exceptions that I will always go with when it comes for business use:
- Windows over Linux
- MS Office over OpenOffice/fill in another free office suite
So what do you think? Do you lean more towards the commercial offering or the freebie?

