<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The New Notepad</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/the-new-notepad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/the-new-notepad/</link> <description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: idodialog</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/the-new-notepad/comment-page-1/#comment-15068</link> <dc:creator>idodialog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:15:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=8041#comment-15068</guid> <description>Interesting pointer to software, worst screen grab ever seen - shame.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting pointer to software, worst screen grab ever seen &#8211; shame.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sharron (kkomp)</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/the-new-notepad/comment-page-1/#comment-14997</link> <dc:creator>Sharron (kkomp)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:16:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=8041#comment-14997</guid> <description>Vista isn&#039;t exactly one of Microsoft&#039;s success stories is it? Basically all it did was advertise how good XP was and drive people to Linux and Mac.Having said that I do appreciate that there are some people who like it: I have a friend who absolutely loves it...But overall the launch onwards was one of, if not the greatest one of, Microsoft&#039;s biggest failures since ME: Driver and hardware incompatibility were major issues due to M$&#039;s secret development policy and their reticence to disclose hardware requirements to the component manufacturers; although granted those manufacturers were also slow off the mark.Even after the hardware was being made to the correct standard; Vista proved to be full of bugs. Even after the final retail release of SP1 - Which took down a few systems - Vista is till slower in some departments than XP, despite its grandiose hardware and memory requirements.It&#039;s not so much a case of myself not liking Vista as it is of the facts speaking for themselves. I am, in all honesty, what could be described as a &quot;wintard&quot;; but in my opinion to give any comment on Vista other than &quot;FAIL&quot; wouldn&#039;t be keeping true to myself and my feelings about the operating system.Your opinion may be different; and I respect that fact. I apologise for any offence caused by my words. :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vista isn&#8217;t exactly one of Microsoft&#8217;s success stories is it? Basically all it did was advertise how good XP was and drive people to Linux and Mac.</p><p>Having said that I do appreciate that there are some people who like it: I have a friend who absolutely loves it&#8230;But overall the launch onwards was one of, if not the greatest one of, Microsoft&#8217;s biggest failures since ME: Driver and hardware incompatibility were major issues due to M$&#8217;s secret development policy and their reticence to disclose hardware requirements to the component manufacturers; although granted those manufacturers were also slow off the mark.</p><p>Even after the hardware was being made to the correct standard; Vista proved to be full of bugs. Even after the final retail release of SP1 &#8211; Which took down a few systems &#8211; Vista is till slower in some departments than XP, despite its grandiose hardware and memory requirements.</p><p>It&#8217;s not so much a case of myself not liking Vista as it is of the facts speaking for themselves. I am, in all honesty, what could be described as a &#8220;wintard&#8221;; but in my opinion to give any comment on Vista other than &#8220;FAIL&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t be keeping true to myself and my feelings about the operating system.</p><p>Your opinion may be different; and I respect that fact. I apologise for any offence caused by my words. <img
src='http://pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Greg</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/the-new-notepad/comment-page-1/#comment-14995</link> <dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:52:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=8041#comment-14995</guid> <description>Did you really need to write &quot;And Vista: FAIL.&quot;?  If even you don&#039;t like vista.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you really need to write &#8220;And Vista: FAIL.&#8221;?  If even you don&#8217;t like vista.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 34/45 queries in 0.015 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.pcmech.com @ 2012-02-14 05:49:46 -->
