<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Sexiest Women in Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:17:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brigitte Birch</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-11355</link>
		<dc:creator>Brigitte Birch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/#comment-11355</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m flattered but just for the record, the facebook profile isn&#039;t mine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m flattered but just for the record, the facebook profile isn&#8217;t mine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-6979</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/#comment-6979</guid>
		<description>Mary Catherine Ham. How could you leave her out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary Catherine Ham. How could you leave her out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trishthedish</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-6898</link>
		<dc:creator>trishthedish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/#comment-6898</guid>
		<description>well...I&#039;m waiting...the top ten sexiest MEN in technology are...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well&#8230;I&#8217;m waiting&#8230;the top ten sexiest MEN in technology are&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best PCMech Posts of 2007 &#187; PC Mechanic</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-6569</link>
		<dc:creator>Best PCMech Posts of 2007 &#187; PC Mechanic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/#comment-6569</guid>
		<description>[...] Top 10 Sexiest Women in Technology Need I really explain this one? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top 10 Sexiest Women in Technology Need I really explain this one? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Affiliate Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-6515</link>
		<dc:creator>The Affiliate Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 13:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/#comment-6515</guid>
		<description>I would throw Brigitte Birch from NHS Tech support into that mix as well! (she has a facebook profile!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would throw Brigitte Birch from NHS Tech support into that mix as well! (she has a facebook profile!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason-Saggers.com &#187; items around the internet</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-6410</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason-Saggers.com &#187; items around the internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/#comment-6410</guid>
		<description>[...] up I spotted this article about the top 10 women in/of technology (IT) I have heard of most off them and there is a few new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up I spotted this article about the top 10 women in/of technology (IT) I have heard of most off them and there is a few new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feanix</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-6057</link>
		<dc:creator>Feanix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 02:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/#comment-6057</guid>
		<description>Attacks from he fairer sex? As a member of the fairer sex I think the only thing that needs attacking is the pictures for some of these women. All of the women are hot but some of their pics just don&#039;t do them the justice they deserve. I think it&#039;s a beautiful thing to see the sexy women of the tech trade. Well done Dave. You found the beauty in a cold modern technological world and someone who can find the beauty of things should never be attacked for it but appreciated for the good work they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attacks from he fairer sex? As a member of the fairer sex I think the only thing that needs attacking is the pictures for some of these women. All of the women are hot but some of their pics just don&#8217;t do them the justice they deserve. I think it&#8217;s a beautiful thing to see the sexy women of the tech trade. Well done Dave. You found the beauty in a cold modern technological world and someone who can find the beauty of things should never be attacked for it but appreciated for the good work they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marah Marie</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-6056</link>
		<dc:creator>Marah Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 02:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/#comment-6056</guid>
		<description>Oh pogomcl, so it&#039;s nice to see some &quot;briny&quot; ladies online, is it? Are you sure? I wouldn&#039;t care to be  &quot;briny&quot;, but if it floats your boat...

Dave, I am totally *not* a feminist, and not for woman&#039;s lib (I think it destroyed society as we once knew it) but the old stereotype of men holds true, that if a woman is not beautiful she will not get an iota of attention or respect from any man, especially not online, where making fun of women for even *being* online is as much the norm today as ever. 

Men can listen to an ugly man like Jim Cramer all day and not be offended by his looks, but the &quot;ugly bitch&quot; reporting the news or giving out tech advice has got to go. There is no rationality from men about women at all; men simply see them through one lens: that of their own sexuality, and their every opinion of a woman grows out of that. If she is not a turn-on (but classy, she must be classy, and also seem unattainable, or else she will be called some pretty bad names) then she is not fit to rub elbows with or know as much as a men does; end of story.

That said, yes, they all do seem like very attractive ladies. You left out a few I would say are beautiful as well, but whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh pogomcl, so it&#8217;s nice to see some &#8220;briny&#8221; ladies online, is it? Are you sure? I wouldn&#8217;t care to be  &#8220;briny&#8221;, but if it floats your boat&#8230;</p>
<p>Dave, I am totally *not* a feminist, and not for woman&#8217;s lib (I think it destroyed society as we once knew it) but the old stereotype of men holds true, that if a woman is not beautiful she will not get an iota of attention or respect from any man, especially not online, where making fun of women for even *being* online is as much the norm today as ever. </p>
<p>Men can listen to an ugly man like Jim Cramer all day and not be offended by his looks, but the &#8220;ugly bitch&#8221; reporting the news or giving out tech advice has got to go. There is no rationality from men about women at all; men simply see them through one lens: that of their own sexuality, and their every opinion of a woman grows out of that. If she is not a turn-on (but classy, she must be classy, and also seem unattainable, or else she will be called some pretty bad names) then she is not fit to rub elbows with or know as much as a men does; end of story.</p>
<p>That said, yes, they all do seem like very attractive ladies. You left out a few I would say are beautiful as well, but whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pogomcl</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-5885</link>
		<dc:creator>pogomcl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 06:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/#comment-5885</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s an easy one to find out-- just ask for the model release form at iStock. why should there be attacks from the ladies when he&#039;s promoting visibility of  hi-tech ladies in a field that&#039;s supposed to be dominated by male chauvinism? you know it&#039;s a problem with  clinton-- she&#039;s  not and she comes across like an old nag or matron from patridge family or eight is enough. nice to see there are sexy, geeky ladies out there that break the stereotype of brainy old maids with thick glasses and mousy hair or battle-axess like old Madge with her coffee ads. why should pretty women be stereotyped by brainless  5-inch stilletoes on catwalks with drug problems or mediocre actresses with too much money with gross body-makeovers? nice to see briny, techie and sexy ladies breaking social stereotypes. they&#039;re not cheerleaders or airline stewardesses, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s an easy one to find out&#8211; just ask for the model release form at iStock. why should there be attacks from the ladies when he&#8217;s promoting visibility of  hi-tech ladies in a field that&#8217;s supposed to be dominated by male chauvinism? you know it&#8217;s a problem with  clinton&#8211; she&#8217;s  not and she comes across like an old nag or matron from patridge family or eight is enough. nice to see there are sexy, geeky ladies out there that break the stereotype of brainy old maids with thick glasses and mousy hair or battle-axess like old Madge with her coffee ads. why should pretty women be stereotyped by brainless  5-inch stilletoes on catwalks with drug problems or mediocre actresses with too much money with gross body-makeovers? nice to see briny, techie and sexy ladies breaking social stereotypes. they&#8217;re not cheerleaders or airline stewardesses, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David M</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-5794</link>
		<dc:creator>David M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/top-10-sexiest-women-in-technology/#comment-5794</guid>
		<description>Whew..nice!  I&#039;m waiting for the attacks from the fairer sex for doing this.  Gutsy move Dave! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew..nice!  I&#8217;m waiting for the attacks from the fairer sex for doing this.  Gutsy move Dave! <img src='http://www.pcmech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
