<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s The Difference Between DVD+R and DVD-R?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Moon River</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/comment-page-1/#comment-32891</link>
		<dc:creator>Moon River</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/#comment-32891</guid>
		<description>Nice information about DVD!
DVD-R was first released in 1997 by Pioneer, and proved by DVD Forum, and 5 years later, year 2002, DVD+R released by DVD+RW Alliance as the compete formats. DVD+R is a non-rewritable format and it is compatible with about 89% of all DVD Players and most DVD-ROMs.
I also found a cool articles about the difference between DVD+r and DVD-r, More information about this topic:
http://www.mediasoftmac.com/article/difference-between-dvd+r-and-dvd-r.html#129</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice information about DVD!<br />
DVD-R was first released in 1997 by Pioneer, and proved by DVD Forum, and 5 years later, year 2002, DVD+R released by DVD+RW Alliance as the compete formats. DVD+R is a non-rewritable format and it is compatible with about 89% of all DVD Players and most DVD-ROMs.<br />
I also found a cool articles about the difference between DVD+r and DVD-r, More information about this topic:<br />
<a href="http://www.mediasoftmac.com/article/difference-between-dvd+r-and-dvd-r.html#129" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediasoftmac.com/article/difference-between-dvd+r-and-dvd-r.html#129</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MajTJKong</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/comment-page-1/#comment-28389</link>
		<dc:creator>MajTJKong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/#comment-28389</guid>
		<description>After checking the capacity of both Verbatim DVD-R and DVD+R and TDK DVD-R, I have to believe that this is wrong: &quot;The -R will hold 4,707,319,808 bytes while the +R holds 4,700,372,992 bytes&quot;

In fact, these figures are probably transversed. I found out because I have a 4,700,421,808 byte .ISO (4.3776 GB) that would not fit on either manufacturer&#039;s DVD-R but did fit on the DVD+R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After checking the capacity of both Verbatim DVD-R and DVD+R and TDK DVD-R, I have to believe that this is wrong: &#8220;The -R will hold 4,707,319,808 bytes while the +R holds 4,700,372,992 bytes&#8221;</p>
<p>In fact, these figures are probably transversed. I found out because I have a 4,700,421,808 byte .ISO (4.3776 GB) that would not fit on either manufacturer&#8217;s DVD-R but did fit on the DVD+R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SAP</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/comment-page-1/#comment-20671</link>
		<dc:creator>SAP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/#comment-20671</guid>
		<description>RW is useful for disks that you don&#039;t want to keep unchanged forever. 

For example, a toolbox disk containing useful utilities. When a utility is updated, just update the RW disk instead of burning a new one.

Or Linux install disks - unless you really want to keep copies of every version, just reburn with the latest image.

Write-once disks are cheaper to buy, but their disposal is not environmentally friendly, so they should ideally be reserved for long-term storage.

Better yet, use USB memory sticks instead. However DVD may be required for some situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RW is useful for disks that you don&#8217;t want to keep unchanged forever. </p>
<p>For example, a toolbox disk containing useful utilities. When a utility is updated, just update the RW disk instead of burning a new one.</p>
<p>Or Linux install disks &#8211; unless you really want to keep copies of every version, just reburn with the latest image.</p>
<p>Write-once disks are cheaper to buy, but their disposal is not environmentally friendly, so they should ideally be reserved for long-term storage.</p>
<p>Better yet, use USB memory sticks instead. However DVD may be required for some situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Stone</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/comment-page-1/#comment-20633</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/#comment-20633</guid>
		<description>The only reason I purchased RW disks is to use with my Toshiba TX-20 TIVO
( http://www.tacp.toshiba.com/dvd/product.asp?model=rs-tx20 ). Sometimes a 1 hour TV show contains only a 10 or 15 minute segment I wish to hang onto. I burn from the TIVO hard drive to a DVD-RW in the TIVO DVD burner, then walk the DVD-RW over to my computer to edit the show down to what I want to keep on my computer in a wmv, mpeg, avi, etc format. At one time DVD-RW might have been a backup media solution, but not in these days of multi terrabyte hard drives</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason I purchased RW disks is to use with my Toshiba TX-20 TIVO<br />
( <a href="http://www.tacp.toshiba.com/dvd/product.asp?model=rs-tx20" rel="nofollow">http://www.tacp.toshiba.com/dvd/product.asp?model=rs-tx20</a> ). Sometimes a 1 hour TV show contains only a 10 or 15 minute segment I wish to hang onto. I burn from the TIVO hard drive to a DVD-RW in the TIVO DVD burner, then walk the DVD-RW over to my computer to edit the show down to what I want to keep on my computer in a wmv, mpeg, avi, etc format. At one time DVD-RW might have been a backup media solution, but not in these days of multi terrabyte hard drives</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trendless</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/comment-page-1/#comment-20629</link>
		<dc:creator>trendless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/#comment-20629</guid>
		<description>Regarding points two and three of &quot;where DVD-R is required&quot;: bitsetting makes minus or plus R moot.  It&#039;s [fairly] simple to set the book type to DVD-ROM so as to guarantee compatibility with all DVD players, especially the old ones -- if you want to ensure this, you&#039;ll be changing the book type no matter whether you burn to minus or plus R discs.

Very interesting about the differences in data capacity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding points two and three of &#8220;where DVD-R is required&#8221;: bitsetting makes minus or plus R moot.  It&#8217;s [fairly] simple to set the book type to DVD-ROM so as to guarantee compatibility with all DVD players, especially the old ones &#8212; if you want to ensure this, you&#8217;ll be changing the book type no matter whether you burn to minus or plus R discs.</p>
<p>Very interesting about the differences in data capacity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/comment-page-1/#comment-20627</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/#comment-20627</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification. Can you shed some light on RWs? It seems to me there&#039;s no logical reason to get them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification. Can you shed some light on RWs? It seems to me there&#8217;s no logical reason to get them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Menga</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/comment-page-1/#comment-20624</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Menga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/#comment-20624</guid>
		<description>DVD+R is supported by most major companies (Microsoft, Philips, etc.) but I&#039;m unsure as to how widely it is in the open source (Linux) community. I&#039;m on the assumption it should work just as well?

And yes it&#039;s true, the +R format is usually more reliable for data storage. But bear in mind track following errors are usually indicative of a hardware or media fault (i.e. bad drive and/or bad disc) rather than disc format. This is why I tell anyone never to buy Sony brand DVDs (trust me, there&#039;s a reason why they&#039;re always on sale). :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DVD+R is supported by most major companies (Microsoft, Philips, etc.) but I&#8217;m unsure as to how widely it is in the open source (Linux) community. I&#8217;m on the assumption it should work just as well?</p>
<p>And yes it&#8217;s true, the +R format is usually more reliable for data storage. But bear in mind track following errors are usually indicative of a hardware or media fault (i.e. bad drive and/or bad disc) rather than disc format. This is why I tell anyone never to buy Sony brand DVDs (trust me, there&#8217;s a reason why they&#8217;re always on sale). <img src='http://www.pcmech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Stone</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/comment-page-1/#comment-20619</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-dvdr-and-dvd-r/#comment-20619</guid>
		<description>I have a 3 year old Toshiba Series 2 TIVO with DVD burner that will only burn to DVD-R or DVD-RW. From what I&#039;ve read the hardware could write to DVD+R but the Linux based OS is hardwired for DVD-R only. I&#039;ve also read that writing to DVD+R is more reliable than writing to DVD-R, something to do with track following?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a 3 year old Toshiba Series 2 TIVO with DVD burner that will only burn to DVD-R or DVD-RW. From what I&#8217;ve read the hardware could write to DVD+R but the Linux based OS is hardwired for DVD-R only. I&#8217;ve also read that writing to DVD+R is more reliable than writing to DVD-R, something to do with track following?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
