<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: What&#8217;s The Most Used Monitor Resolution Now?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-most-used-monitor-resolution-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-most-used-monitor-resolution-now/</link> <description>Tech Powered Life... Simplified</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 03:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator> <item><title>By: Boublik</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-most-used-monitor-resolution-now/comment-page-1/#comment-77810</link> <dc:creator>Boublik</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:50:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=15994#comment-77810</guid> <description>1440x900? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1440&#215;900?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kevin Vesga</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-most-used-monitor-resolution-now/comment-page-1/#comment-77800</link> <dc:creator>Kevin Vesga</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 04:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=15994#comment-77800</guid> <description>Good. I&#039;m tired of seeing skinny websites with whitespace on the sides. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good. I&#8217;m tired of seeing skinny websites with whitespace on the sides.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David M</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-most-used-monitor-resolution-now/comment-page-1/#comment-77799</link> <dc:creator>David M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:24:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=15994#comment-77799</guid> <description>A black bar on the screen has never bothered me.  I rarely even notice it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A black bar on the screen has never bothered me.  I rarely even notice it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mmseng1</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-most-used-monitor-resolution-now/comment-page-1/#comment-77794</link> <dc:creator>mmseng1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=15994#comment-77794</guid> <description>I&#039;ve used 1620x1050 (16:10) for a long time now and I can&#039;t stand the 16:9 monitors at work anymore. They just look... skinny. I&#039;m sure it&#039;s just me being used to 16:10 now though. With widescreen monitors, I already consider vertical real estate to be far more precious than horizontal, and that&#039;s why 16:9 makes me cringe.Also, While there are other ratios out there, 16:9 and 16:10 seem to be some of the most common. Honestly I don&#039;t see a problem with going 16:10 (or really, pretty much any res so long as it fits your monitor). I&#039;ve never had an issue with fullscreen content like videos or games, and I&#039;ve never seen a video that didn&#039;t scale well to any particular monitor, nor a modern video game that didn&#039;t support more resolutions than I knew existed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used 1620&#215;1050 (16:10) for a long time now and I can&#8217;t stand the 16:9 monitors at work anymore. They just look&#8230; skinny. I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s just me being used to 16:10 now though. With widescreen monitors, I already consider vertical real estate to be far more precious than horizontal, and that&#8217;s why 16:9 makes me cringe.</p><p>Also, While there are other ratios out there, 16:9 and 16:10 seem to be some of the most common. Honestly I don&#8217;t see a problem with going 16:10 (or really, pretty much any res so long as it fits your monitor). I&#8217;ve never had an issue with fullscreen content like videos or games, and I&#8217;ve never seen a video that didn&#8217;t scale well to any particular monitor, nor a modern video game that didn&#8217;t support more resolutions than I knew existed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bryan "bytehead" Price</title><link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/whats-the-most-used-monitor-resolution-now/comment-page-1/#comment-77792</link> <dc:creator>Bryan "bytehead" Price</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/?p=15994#comment-77792</guid> <description>I&#039;m at 1920x1200 currently. That was after the 1600x1200 display died. Unless I&#039;m forced to go with a touch screen as an update, I figure my next one will be 2560x1600. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m at 1920&#215;1200 currently. That was after the 1600&#215;1200 display died. Unless I&#8217;m forced to go with a touch screen as an update, I figure my next one will be 2560&#215;1600.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 39/53 queries in 0.024 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via pcmech.pcmediainc.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.pcmech.com @ 2013-02-12 11:06:46 --