<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where Social Networking Fails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/where-social-networking-fails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/where-social-networking-fails/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/where-social-networking-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-10540</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 13:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/where-social-networking-fails/#comment-10540</guid>
		<description>The thing I don&#039;t get is why even say it&#039;s prohibited at all? If the PC&#039;s are prohibited from accessing MySpace, how can anyone be &quot;discovered on the site&quot;?
No one will be &quot;discovered&quot; if the site&#039;s access is &quot;prohibited&quot; so why even bother with a sign? LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing I don&#8217;t get is why even say it&#8217;s prohibited at all? If the PC&#8217;s are prohibited from accessing MySpace, how can anyone be &#8220;discovered on the site&#8221;?<br />
No one will be &#8220;discovered&#8221; if the site&#8217;s access is &#8220;prohibited&#8221; so why even bother with a sign? LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
