<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Is Linux Reliable?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/why-is-linux-reliable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/why-is-linux-reliable/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joe6966</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/why-is-linux-reliable/comment-page-1/#comment-31532</link>
		<dc:creator>joe6966</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/why-is-linux-reliable/#comment-31532</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of using Linux, and I installed Debian 4 on my desktop PC on it&#039;s own hard drive. I also installed a dual boot. When I wish to boot up into Linux, I just let it happen, but if I wish to go to XP, I have to sit there and catch the screen to pick Windows XP. So, getting into Linux is easy and more difficult for XP.
I still haven&#039;t learned how to install a program in Linux, and I haven&#039;t learned how to mount a drive, so that I can access my files on my C &amp; D drives.
I have much more time now that I only work 2 days a week. (last year worked 6 days a week.) But, I think that my learning ability is somewhat diminished as I am 61 now.
I don&#039;t remember terminal program syntax. It reminds me of DOS back in the mid 80&#039;s. It seems like a lot of work to run Linux for me, but I think it&#039;s ideal for new users who are young and able to learn quickly. 
The free part doesn&#039;t mean much to me as I have adequate funds. (for now)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of using Linux, and I installed Debian 4 on my desktop PC on it&#8217;s own hard drive. I also installed a dual boot. When I wish to boot up into Linux, I just let it happen, but if I wish to go to XP, I have to sit there and catch the screen to pick Windows XP. So, getting into Linux is easy and more difficult for XP.<br />
I still haven&#8217;t learned how to install a program in Linux, and I haven&#8217;t learned how to mount a drive, so that I can access my files on my C &amp; D drives.<br />
I have much more time now that I only work 2 days a week. (last year worked 6 days a week.) But, I think that my learning ability is somewhat diminished as I am 61 now.<br />
I don&#8217;t remember terminal program syntax. It reminds me of DOS back in the mid 80&#8217;s. It seems like a lot of work to run Linux for me, but I think it&#8217;s ideal for new users who are young and able to learn quickly.<br />
The free part doesn&#8217;t mean much to me as I have adequate funds. (for now)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Barringer</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/why-is-linux-reliable/comment-page-1/#comment-31401</link>
		<dc:creator>S Barringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/why-is-linux-reliable/#comment-31401</guid>
		<description>I switched to Linux long ago, and haven&#039;t looked back.  There are distros that are easy even for Windows users to get used to, and even self-install,  which gives them time to learn the inner workings of the system at their own pace.   And, once you start using Linux, you will want to learn to use the full power and flexibility available to you that Linux allows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I switched to Linux long ago, and haven&#8217;t looked back.  There are distros that are easy even for Windows users to get used to, and even self-install,  which gives them time to learn the inner workings of the system at their own pace.   And, once you start using Linux, you will want to learn to use the full power and flexibility available to you that Linux allows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hitchface</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/why-is-linux-reliable/comment-page-1/#comment-13895</link>
		<dc:creator>hitchface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/why-is-linux-reliable/#comment-13895</guid>
		<description>Nice write-up Rich. The beauty of Linux is in it&#039;s total adaptability and its stability. The problem is that you have to delve into your inner geek to really appreciate it. I don&#039;t mind it, but some do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice write-up Rich. The beauty of Linux is in it&#8217;s total adaptability and its stability. The problem is that you have to delve into your inner geek to really appreciate it. I don&#8217;t mind it, but some do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kl</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/why-is-linux-reliable/comment-page-1/#comment-13892</link>
		<dc:creator>kl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/why-is-linux-reliable/#comment-13892</guid>
		<description>Mac OS X is UNIX. Leopard is an Open Brand UNIX 03 Registered Product, conforming to the SUSv3 and POSIX 1003.1 specifications for the C API, Shell Utilities, and Threads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mac OS X is UNIX. Leopard is an Open Brand UNIX 03 Registered Product, conforming to the SUSv3 and POSIX 1003.1 specifications for the C API, Shell Utilities, and Threads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lespaul20</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/why-is-linux-reliable/comment-page-1/#comment-13891</link>
		<dc:creator>Lespaul20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/why-is-linux-reliable/#comment-13891</guid>
		<description>You could just say it&#039;s basically Unix. Although many who read or just visit this site are somewhat savvy, many that I know appreciate the &quot;I&#039;ll do it for you&quot; type of computing, and at times I do too. I really hope some flavor of Linux becomes as easy to use as Windows and in turn, more mainstream software companies write programs/games for. Linux is great for some, Windows/MacOS is ok for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could just say it&#8217;s basically Unix. Although many who read or just visit this site are somewhat savvy, many that I know appreciate the &#8220;I&#8217;ll do it for you&#8221; type of computing, and at times I do too. I really hope some flavor of Linux becomes as easy to use as Windows and in turn, more mainstream software companies write programs/games for. Linux is great for some, Windows/MacOS is ok for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
