Why Use a Mac?

Last week, Jason authored an article on reasons why to use Linux. Jason is a real fan of Linux and I was part of the “heated discussion” he refers to at the beginning of his article. His article really did touch a nerve and has quickly become one of those most popular articles on all of PCMech.

Seeing as I was, indeed, part of said “heated discussion”, I thought I would shed some light on my personal choice of computer: the Mac.

In Summary, My View on The Others

Before I get into OS X, let me properly state my viewpoint on both Windows and Linux. I am not a fanboy of any operating system. All have strengths. All have weaknesses. The choice of operating system is a personal one.

Linux is great for the geek. It is not, in my view, an OS that is ready for prime time use by the typical consumer. Illustrating my point was when Rich and I asked Jason (in said heated discussion) about installing apps in Linux. He immediately started talking about “apt get”, yada yada. And, therein, he proved my point. To a Linux nerd, “apt get” is second nature. But, do you honestly expect the typical end user (think your next door neighbor) to be able to work with that?

Yes, there are package managers and they’re great. But, installing apps isn’t the end of it. Linux is still at a point where you’re either fighting driver support or are finding yourself being forced to use Terminal (the command line) to get things done. When I tried Linux, this is what I was up against. So, don’t try arguing with me, Linux nerds. This is my experience and I’m not exactly new to computers. I was literally LIVING in the command line when I was using Ubuntu. Getting dual screen to work? You have to do all kinds of config file editing. Just not workable. I have never had to edit a config file with OS X. And very rarely under Windows. With Linux, it is almost normal. (Dave now awaits the flame wars of the Linux crowd).

As for Windows, well Vista is and was a disaster. And, what that tells me is that Windows is an operating system in limbo. Windows XP is tried and true. Not that it is perfect, but at least it’s flaws are well known and have been dealt with. The end effect is that XP is a great OS with loads of support. Except that Microsoft is insistent on forcing Vista down everybody’s throat at it’s earliest convenience.

Windows is has-been. It is old news. They try to be new and they fail. For Windows to advance beyond the bloated Vista mess, it has to start ditching legacy support, move to 64-bit, and basically re-design some of the underlying things holding it back (i.e. registry).

But, I’m Using Mac

Again, I am not a fanboy of Apple. I am, though, a fan. I have been using Microsoft on my computers since the days of DOS 6.2. I have worked with every version of Windows that ever existed (for consumers anyway). But, after using XP forever, upgrading to Vista, regretting that decision, downgrading to XP again….well, I was tired of Windows. OS X Leopard was released and it looked fresh and new. So, the day Leopard came out, I went out and bought a Mac Pro. I have been using OS X as my primary OS ever since.

Now, I would never have bought a Mac if I could not have run Windows on it. That was a pre-requisite for me. I now own 3 different Macs and 2 of them have Windows installed inside of VMWare Fusion (the third is a Mini and simply doesn’t have the horsepower). But, as time goes on, I’m using Windows less and less (by choice). I use it for my accounting (because I don’t feel like buying the same software for the Mac) and I also use it for Live Writer. I also use it for Paint Shop Pro because I am so used to that particular image editor. Otherwise, you’ll find me in OS X.

Why I Prefer OS X and Apple

  1. Apple is quicker to develop enhancements. Microsoft has a dirt slow development schedule for Windows and the end result (Vista) sucked hard. Apple developed Leopard much quicker and the upgrade from Tiger was truly worthy of the upgrade.
  2. A Mac is the Only Computer That Can Run EVERY Operating System. I’m a computer tech blogger. I have reason to be able to try any operating system. The Mac is the only machine that allows me to do that. OS X cannot run on anything but Apple. Yes, with some hacking, some have managed to install OS X to a PC, but trust me it isn’t like running it on a true-blue Apple machine. You will be limited if you try the “hackintosh” method, if you can get it to work at all. Not to mention you’re breaking the EULA to even try. But, with OS X as the host OS, I can run any other OS I want either in a virtual machine or with Bootcamp. Personally, I have never used Bootcamp because VMWare Fusion is just that good.
  3. Software Design Is Better. In general, I find the design of applications for OS X to be much better thought out. The GUI design is very good for workability not to mention the visual aesthetics are better than Windows. In fact, the entire GUI of OS X just blows Vista out of the water. Now, some Linux distros using Compiz do some pretty wicked graphics inside the OS, some of which are better than OS X. Kudos to Linux for that, but not enough for me to deal with the rest of it.
  4. Conveniences. OS X Leopard just has things built in that makes Windows look ancient. For example, Quick Look allows easy viewing of any file without worrying about file attachments or being forced to open full, heavy applications just to view one file. Cover Flow makes browsing a folder so easy by providing full, graphical previews of all files in the folder.
  5. Better Value. OS X Leopard retails at $129. If you buy a Mac with it, it comes with it (of course). For that money, you get a real OS that doesn’t bog down (like Vista) and comes with truly useful utilities. For example, Automator comes with OS X and is a hidden gem of the OS, allowing you to easily and graphically create scripts which can help you automate all kinds of tasks on your Mac. I paid more than $129 to buy a retail version of Windows XP. Vista is even more.

For me, these things add up to one thing: I can get my work done quicker and more efficiently on the Mac.

When I had to downgrade from Vista to XP to not have my computer experience totally suck, it was clear to me that Windows is at a plateau. I was on a dead horse. I wanted to use an OS that was leaning forward. Linux has definite strengths, but I didn’t want to use it. It not being commercial does, quite frankly, hinder it. Mac was the clear choice for me.

Popular Misconceptions

  1. Mac is a different world and cannot operate with Windows users. Not true. Almost everybody I deal with uses Windows and I can open all their files with no problems at all. I have had no issues at all with that. Nobody even knows I’m using a Mac unless I tell them.
  2. Everything About Mac costs Money. Not true. There are a lot of free, open source applications available for the Mac. A LOT of them. In fact, it seems as if there are just as many as for Windows. Now, obviously all Linux apps are open source. That’s a given. But, it goes to show that you can load up your Mac with free software to your heart’s content and be very happy. Much of the software I use on my Mac on a daily basis is free (including my office suite).
  3. More Software For Windows than For Mac. Perhaps, but it doesn’t seem like it. Whenever I need to go out and find an OS X app to accomplish something, I find it. I think one thing that leads to this misconception is that you might not see as much retail box software for Mac. But, go online and you’ll see just how much is really available.
  4. Mac is just Uber-Expensive. This debate will rage forever, most likely. The thing about Mac hardware is that it is really good hardware. It will last. With PCs, the majority of them are made of bulk parts. When you pay more to get good quality parts for a PC, you’ll end up in the same price ballpark as a comparable Mac. All this said, it is true that you will need to pay more for a Mac. The fault of this belongs to Apple – NOT because they overprice their products, but because they don’t offer mid-range systems. The IMac is an all-in-one (which many don’t want) and the only tower they have is the expensive Mac Pro. There is no mid-range tower and that is a mistake. But, if you price compare a Mac Pro with a similarly equipped PC, you’re not going to find a huge gap. I am WELL aware that people are going to read that and think I’m a stupid Mactard, but I’ll stand by it – and this is coming from a person who didn’t use to think this.
  5. Apple controls everything you do. Come on, I hear the same thing about Microsoft all the time. The truth is that using a Mac is no different AT ALL than using a Windows machine – except it is a different OS. You don’t have to get your software from Apple. You don’t have to buy all your hardware upgrades from Apple. It is just not the super controlled machine that some make it out to be. If it were, I wouldn’t have bought it.

This article is already getting too long. I will leave it with this:

The choice of operating system is a personal one. If you dig Windows, more power to you. If you think Linux is the answer, more power to you. If you like the Mac, fine. All these machines basically do the same thing, just with different styles. Just the same as if you get to your destination by driving a Ford or a Chevy.

For me, though, I’m glad I jumped ship. I no longer feel as if my computer experience (which, face it, is most of my life given what I do for a living) is at a standstill using an OS which thinks the latest GUI improvement is big icons and glow buttons. Switching to Apple has made things interesting again. I am a techie and I like watching advancement and talking about the latest tech. Well, Microsoft gives me nothing to talk about. It is boring. And now that I’m using the Mac, I’m also finding that Microsoft’s slowness was affecting my work speed in ways I didn’t even realize.

Free eBook!

Like what you read?

If so, please join over 28,000 people who receive our exclusive weekly newsletter and computer tips, and get FREE COPIES of 5 eBooks we created, as our gift to you for subscribing. Just enter your name and email below:

If you enjoyed this article, you might also like...

Post A Comment Using Facebook

  • http://learnfirefox.cybernetnews.com Chris Rossini

    I also recently purchased my first Mac. I’ve used Windows all my life and finally had enough.

    I cannot be happier with my Mac. It feels like I stepped out of the stone ages into the future of computing.

    I’ve also messed with various Linux distros in the past, and I agree that the average user cannot handle Linux. The Linux community confuses me sometimes…there are those that want the average consumer to use it, and others who take pride in the fact that they can’t.

    All your points are spot on though. Mac FTW.

  • http://tech.bizriver.com Jason

    Great article David, an enjoyable read. For the most part, bang on. One point I will make is the one about “apt-get”. During our discussion it was given as the third option to install apps. the other being synaptic and Ubuntu’s Add / Remove software feature…but that’s neither here nor there. I also find using the terminal is something I do almost out of choice. Most things a typical user would need the terminal to do have GUI front-ends…”living in the shell” is by no means a neccessity for the average user….but again, that’s neither here nor there.

    I also agree that OS X, and for those who are curious it is pronounced OS Ten, is a great OS. I would even say perhaps the best general purpose OS. I choose Linux for reasons beyond criteria mentioned in your article and mine…for me it is an attitude and personal philosophy…I’m just lucky Linux is pretty fantastic.

    Windows Vista…*sigh*. Not really much more can be said. Not only did MS miss the target, but the gun jammed and backfired to boot. At a recent conference, Steve Balmer refered to Vista as a “work in progress”. Microsoft knows they flubbed it and I hope they don’t ramrod Windows 7 through development and end up with a worse disaster.

    For some interesting stats, W3Counter.com has some numbers on Global OS usage, among other things, at http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php

  • ALane

    “A Mac is the Only Computer That Can Run EVERY Operating System”

    I don’t think this belongs in your “Why I like MACs” option. While it is true, it’s not a strength. It is due to the fact that Apple WON’T license their product to anything but a mac.

    Don’t get me wrong, I like apple and OS X as much as the next guy… but stating Apple’s proprietary strong-handedness as a strength is a bit misleading.

    • Archie

      I’m actually glad they don’t license it, for the simple reason that, outside of the most common use cases, Apple software usually turns out to be buggy crud. I’m quite sure anyone who’s had the misfortune of providing tech support for Macs can testify to this.

      Not that there’s anything quite like the feeling when, even after an hour of prodding in the candied user interface as well as the terminal (which is typically useless with Apple’s own wonderfully designed software), iPhoto still just doesn’t start. Or whenever Safari spontaneously freezes on the spot, becoming completely unresponsive – and then Finder, which the leaves the option of either using another computer to google for magic key combinations or losing all your work. You guess you can see a pattern here already.

      And software for free? Yeah, if you’re already in the routine of combing through the web for rudimentary software that could be provided through a package management system for a fraction of the effort, it’s a piece of cake. BSD people will of course feel right at home firing up the terminal and saying “portage” this and “portage” that, as long as you’ve installed proper application support first.

      Unless you want games, of course. Then you’ll definitely want a parallel Windows installation to gain the best of both megalomaniac world views.

      • Frnak

        I’ll have a tiny bowl of facts with three extra large scoops of biased opinion please.

        Thanks Archie

  • Michael Moore

    ok so vista is a work in progress….so whats your point. Name one OS that is perfect and is not a continuing work in progress. I understand that the internet is riddled with vocal users who despise Microsoft but doesn’t it get to the point where its just not creditable. As of now the Vista install base is larger than linux and mac’s (100 million licenses). Regardless if those licenses were used or not the fact that they were paid for with the intention of use is sufficient. I know that basing MSFT is the big thing , really i get it, but it becomes boring after awhile.
    Macs are great. Cant downplay them because i believe they are great machines that run a great OS.
    Linux is also a great OS but again its not ready for the simplicity of use when it comes to either a PC or a Mac. When the day comes and i can use dual monitors by checking a box (ala windows) then we have achieved simplicity. Reality is reality and facts are facts. MSFT can not dump backward compatibility for numerous reasons one of them being is the fact that Windows is a enterprise OS not a consumer OS. Thats a big difference and one that not many people clearly understand. Business need reassurance that there ten year old printer works or that twenty year old tax software runs. To just dump it all for the sake of moving forward shows lack of insight and conherient thought in regards to bloggers and “analyst” such as forester. Windows is becoming more componentlized when it comes to both installation and imaging for deployment. Again consumers will not see it only because such advancements in the windows system is not meant for them. Group policy’s improvement, deployment and compatibility’s are reasons to switch to Vista.
    I am more than willing to agree that the marketing behind Vista was very poor and MSFT allowed public perception to dominate the mind share but people must learn to look and read behind the nonsense that is posted. The internet makes fools into wise kings.

    -Mikerosoft.

    (Dave, good seeing your article.)

    • David Risley

      Mike, I would love to have you write a post on why Windows is better than Linus or Mac. Honestly, it is something you rarely see and I think you could make the case.

  • derk

    I don’t think OSX can count on free open source ware. Vista’s problems sure give the other competitors a big plus. Without ISVs, however, OSX will never become a major market share holder. This was where OS/2, which was similarly deemed a better OS than Win95 13 years ago, got killed. And Apple has been notorious for treating ISVs as pupils dancing on their strings. In the eyes of ISVs, Apple is not only untrustworthy but also arrogant. M$ might mess Vista up (just a little bit in my eyes), but they are not losing out those ISVs. For ease of development, support and software evolving, Windows is still far ahead of its competitors.

    Disclaimer: This comes from a developer that writes commercial software.

  • http://www.brianwoods.com Brian Woods

    My problems with Apple is pretty much only that you are locked into the hardware they want you to have. I wanted to be able to back up to Blu Ray. Maybe one day you can do that on a Mac, but it isn’t today (and yes, I know there might well be an external option, but I’m a Peace Corps volunteer and carring an external hard drive around besides the laptop is problematic enough).

    You are dead on, too, that Windows people can easily learn OSX. It is pretty well designed.

    What gets me, though, is that some people think Apple is flawless. At the nearly Mac only office I worked in last year, things went pretty smoothly, unless you wanted to have Photoshop AND Illustrator open at once. Some of the programs were buggy (I don’t think Now Contacts ever really propogated updates throughout the PCs on the network properly). The Mac on my desk hated playing DVDs, too, and when ejecting would launch them across the room And That.Stupid.Pinwheel when a boss was yelling at me for something and the computer got nervous and opted to take 10 minutes to open an app instead of giving me the instant access to the info my boss wanted (which completely neutralizes your argument that their hardware is any better or more stable).

    There might be solutions to all these problems that are easy and simple, but none of the Mac gurus in the office could figure them out.

    I guess ultimately I feel that Apple focuses on OS enhancements more than hardware enhancements. Power DVD and my Blu Ray drive work flawlessly every time I use them in Vista. I got my first Vista bluescreen yesterday after using it since September. No OS is perfect…they all have their own faults and eccentricities.

    • David Risley

      Brian, sounds to me like you were using an old Mac. All of mine are pretty new and I never find myself waiting around for it or spitting out CDs. In fact, the Macs I use are the fastest machines I’ve ever used.

      Apple is working on the hardware all the time. It sounds to me like you’ve been off the Apple radar for years.

  • http://www.brianwoods.com Brian Woods

    Hi Dave!

    While I don’t know the year and I didn’t pay attention to which rev of OSX they had, they were all flat paneled iMacs, maybe even Intel based ones. I am trying to remember what the revision was listed as when the software updater ran. I am not positive, but I am thinking that most of them were G5s.

    I was very disillusioned a year ago when I finally realized that they weren’t better than Windows computers; they just had different problems. Maybe mine was just more onery than most or maybe all of them just needed more RAM (which is what I would have diagnosed the problem being in a WinPC).

    I think my biggest problem was not knowing how to start killing other programs when I sat there staring at that Pinwheel of Doom.

    All that said, I liked them for the most part. A couple of the guys in the office got tricked out Mac Book Pros last summer and those things were amazing. If they had Blu Ray drives, I’d be typing this from one of them right now instead of a Vaio.

  • Nick Woodson

    Okay….I started with Tandy (Model III) and Apple (2g) tens of thousands of years ago. Having said that, on all of my home PCs I use Linux….but my Macs are…well Macs. I’ve had NO trouble with Ubuntu, although the most user friendly is still PCLinux (use Synaptic for package management and it’s civilian-proof…I haven’t had driver issues with it either).

    People are afraid of Macs because of the FUD factor. I work in a Win2K environment and hate it…problem is that 2K/XP are what 90% of users know. It’s fatiguing…but true. You can’t get people to change just because you’re right.

    The point that you make about cost is only half right. You still can’t get a Mac at commodity prices which is exactly what most consumers want. That’s why WalMart/Sam’s, Costco, etc. do such a booming business. Face it, that stress was such that Dell had to change their bussiness model so it’s a safe bet that the point is valid. The average consumer still buys on price so I’ve been telling the “average” computer users I konw who need a new machine to get a Mini…mostly to prove that Macs are reasonably priced, but mostly so I don’t have to deal with Vista when they need help.

    I don’t expect Apple to change their business model…they don’t have to. By the same token, if someone only likes Corvettes they likely won’t buy a Porsche. Mac users just have to adjust to baseball, hot dogs, Apple pie and Microsoft.

  • N

    Looking at ‘flashy GUIs’ is what gives you something exciting to talk about?

    Are you kidding me?

    WOW.

    Whether on a whole or not it was a ‘failure’ — I love Vista. From the tons of enhancements under the hood to the changes in Explorer: it has and does everything I need it to do.

  • Michael (Mike_ROSOFT)

    Dave. I will write up a artcile about Windows. I really believe that poor preception and lack of understanding is what drives the anti msft hate or whatever people wish to call it. You should have a article by the end of this week (saturday).

    Thanks for the suggestions.

  • Kenny

    It’s really a moot point to make whether one operating system is better than the other, especially since it is all user preference. It all boils down to the hardware and macs just has a chip that allows OSX to be installed. Macs are no different than PC’s anymore… they both use x86 processors, and the same interchangeable hardware and both systems can run the same operating systems, except for OSX. Macs are definitely flashy, trendy, hip, and has bragging factor to boot like a sports car and you pay a premium for their brand and cool design. I personally don’t like macs because they aren’t utilitarian. I can’t put in a geforce 9800gx2 into a MacPro without running bootcamp to run vista or XP. Plus all MacPro’s come with a friggin XEON processor. Who needs a XEON unless you are running some kind of a data server?? For day to day use a XEON is a total waste of money… you need to be doing some heavy number crunching that would fill the huge caches on these processors. DDR3? why? no motherboard can truly take full advantage of the ddr3 bandwidth that just keeps on expanding everyweek. For a desktop computer a DDR2-800 is more than enough.

    Then there is driver support on OSX… a lot of hardware supported in OSX. Especially the latest video cards on the market. Not even a cheap mainstream 9600GT on a macpro w/o bootcamp. Then I hear the news that the 64-bit version of adobe photoshop won’t be released for OSX because apple dropped carbon support.

    But see? It’s personal preference. I like playing games, having the latest hardware, and want to use 64-bit photoshop. Thus I like Vista 64-bit edition because it lets me do all the above and more. For people who can care less about games, or 64-bit photoshop, or the latest hardware, then OSX is perfect as it does e-mail, internet, word processing data management very well. For people who love hacking and running the command line, and getting everything for free then linux is perfect.

  • Blobert

    “The thing about Mac hardware is that it is really good hardware. It will last. With PCs, the majority of them are made of bulk parts. When you pay more to get good quality parts for a PC, you’ll end up in the same price” What the Heck!??!?!??!?!? This assumption is based on what? And Apples “aren’t” built using bulk parts? WOW… just wow…..

    • Norn

      I actually find a lot of mac hardware to be really crappy. Remember the whole aluminum mac display fiasco? advertised at 16.7million colors when it was only capable of a little over 200,000 colors. Then the 1st gen macbook pro burning people’s laps, and apple replying to that and said to not put it on your lap as it is not a laptop, it’s a notebook. 1st gen ipod’s exploding due to battery issues because they used cheap lithiums.

      Lepoard is another thing too, a lot of software that were written for macs no longer work for Lepoard. For example photoshop 7.0. You have to buy photoshop CS in the least for it to run on lepoard. is there a freeware version of photoshop CS? I don’t think so. Even with a student discount it’s still a lot of money.

  • Diode

    I can’t believe what I just read. That article has Fanboy written all over it. To trash Vista while unsubstantiated, thus the article intent was proof to me. JMHO

  • Paul

    Very interesting article with many valid points. As a windows user since 3.1 I find that leopard is a easy system to adjust to, it just takes some time to figure out the unique differences. However as I just purchased a macbook pro I had a few comments based on my mac experience so far. While macs are well built machines, they are not crash proof. I have had itunes freeze 4 times and safari crash once using Leopard. The reason I found out was because of a logitech usb mouse which didn’t have the mac drivers installed. Now I know people bash Vista, but when I installed new hardware on my gaming machine it worked no drivers needed, windows took care of everything. Sure when it first came out vista had some driver issues, but hey it’s Microsoft what do you expect. An OS can’t be all things to all people that s why it’s nice to have the choice.

  • Gifin

    Well, I agree about Mac, in my mind Microsoft has turned into MicroSuck and Windows has turned into WindBlows. I think that XP is OK, 2000 is actually better.

    I too went out and got a Mac Pro after being saddled with Vista. I also, got a Dell with Ubuntu. One place I part ways with the discussion is about Linux, at least as far as Ubuntu goes.

    I hate to admit it, but years ago I tried to install Linux when it was a handful of files on a server in Europe and I had to use old command line tools to get the server to cough it up.

    It worked, kind of but I was not a fan of self inflicted pain. So, I retreated to my DOS 5 system and my Apple 2E.

    I don’t yet know about apt get, rpm, kernels etc. but if the average user does average things (email, install apps from Ubuntu, surf the web etc.) Ubuntu at least is simpler than Windblows systems and cheaper than a Mac. My distro (check out the geek speak!) is great and you would have to fight me for it.

  • Dolores

    It is not the responsibility of the Operating system to make drivers, its the responsibility of the hardware manufacturers. It is NOT vista’s fault that some drivers were faulty. And the same goes for drivers in linux. If you want to point a finger at someone, point it at the the hardware manufacturers. Driver issues are not OS issues.

  • william

    1. I have no doubt that Mister David Risley is
    a very experienced and competent computer user.

    2. I think the accent should have been putted
    on hardware; and not on software. Which machine
    is better built: the one produced by Apple, by
    Sun, by SGI, or by a certain PC manufacturer?

    3. If Itanium is a much better processor than
    any other model produced by other vendors (even
    Intel), and if we have “portable” OSs, this is
    one more reason to talk about hardaware, first.

    4. I claim that the operating system named “Open
    BSD” is better than the ones developed by Apple,
    Microsoft, IBM, and all the others.

    The project is widely known for the developers’
    insistence on open source code; and quality
    documentation; + uncompromising position on
    software licensing; and focus on security and
    code correctness. Yes, it has been developed by
    meticulous academics; and thoroughly tested. The
    result? Only two remote holes in the default
    install, in more than 10 years! It is well known
    the fact that the “OpenBSD boxes” are running
    for years without any problems. Indeed, the OS is
    not quite easy to install; but this must not be
    considered a problem, as long as the final result
    is: security, stability, small size, bug-free,
    no need to update every month, and other advan-
    tages. It’s almost perfect.

    Apple, Microsoft, Sun and others have “borrowed”
    code from BSDs. Simply because their experts were
    not able to write better code lines.

    OSX?! Maybe OS “BSD-X”!!

    So, what would you prefer: an iMac, a Power Mac,
    an Intellistation, a Sun workstation, or a SGI
    workstation?

    Well, if Nvidia claims that “the micro-processor
    is dead”, and everything is about “visualization”,
    I would anytime prefer to use a Silicon Graphics
    workstation, instead of a Mac, or a PC – even if
    they are equipped at a “high end” level.

    With SGI, you can FEEL the (huge) difference:
    every command is executed almost instantaneously.
    You don’t have to wait.

    If I’m not wrong, SGI is the preffered choice of
    the artists from Hollywood (those who create the
    “special effects”, in movies).

    I tryed a (low-end!) SGI workstation. And after,
    I never looked back to iMacs and PCs. Simply,
    they are not good enough. They are not FAST enough.

    And, in our days, Speed is everything.-

  • http://www.cyclelogicpress.com Partners in Grime

    Video rendering.

  • http://www.cyclelogicpress.com Partners in Grime

    Excellent summary of the Mac myths. Macs generally last longer than PCs.

  • Gifin

    Not so about drivers…The OS takes some responsibility for them and Microsoft requires them to be vetted, a job they were in a rush to do and missed the boat when it comes to Vista.

    When Microsoft had to bet the farm on 95 and 98 they made sure that the OS would work with everything including a Timex watch. I guess their priorities have changed.

  • http://www.cmillertime.com Chris Miller

    Another reason many people choose to pay such a price for Macs is that Apple’s service is simply amazing. Last week, I had Apple fix the Bluetooth module in my MacBook. The computer was gone for a total of four days and everything was covered under AppleCare. Also, the resale value for any Mac is substantially larger than resale values for PCs; making it worth the extra cash when you go to upgrade to a newer Mac.

  • Gifin

    Well, I got tired of Microsuck’s pushing junk on me like Vista with their overwhelming glacial takeover using OEMs like Dell.

    The next OS will be even worse, half PC half Internet, no thank you.

    I like the Mac and comparing Mac to WinX is like comparing Ford and Chevy, some like one and some like the other.

    I just DON’T LIKE MICROSOFT’S TACTICS. I can use both Mac and Wintel each for different tasks. I like the “fit and finish” of Mac over wintel, while I liked the “access” to the controls on wintel better.

    My reason to shift was I have begun moving to LinUnix and while Linux is still “teething” it gives me more control than either Mac or Windows. I got a Mac Pro because the new Mac X system has the Unix / BSD underpinning.

    Oh, by the way the last straw was Vista, it is sooo bad it blows chunks. All my friends keep coming to me to make it work, I have seen more Vista “issues” in the last month than I have ever seen with Wintel except maybe in the DOS 5 to win3.1x era. I will not use Vista and if the econo-box I have with Vista from Dell on it won’t take XP I will give it away.

    nuf’ said

  • http://www.brianwoods.com Brian Woods

    I can totally appreciate your reasoning and logic, Gifin.

    My only comment is that Vista came on the laptop I bought to take with me as a Peace Corps volunteer. *knock on wood* I have yet to have a single problem I wasn’t able to figure out. The worst was somehow I managed to kill my internet connection, but a System Restore fixed that (although I didn’t expect it to). For system tweaking, Vista has worked exactly like XP, just with more polish. All this is said after I had all kinds of problems with the Release Candidate I tried on my desktop at the end of 06.

    My best guess is that a “closed” system like a laptop means everything inside is forced to meet Vista specs where as my homebuilt desktop might have parts Vista didn’t like.

    There is another guy who helps people with computer problems, so my facts might be completely off, but personally, I’ved helped one Windows person with a problem that was user error and three Mac people with problems (two I chalk up to user error, one is that her Mac won’t read dual layer burned dvds).

    But yeah, I think of OSes as political parties. Some people are Democrats, some are Republicans and some are Libtertarians. I’ll be happy when the Libtertarians run a candidate that doesn’t require downloading packages for net access before you have net access.

  • Pingback: Why does everyone use a Macbook ?

  • richizy

    I have to say this article hits the debate right on target. I myself own leopard, ubuntu, vista, xp, and windows 7. They’re all hooked on the same home network, and I typically use each one for its own kind of niche. For example,

    Leopard – multimedia purposes, photoshop, video editing
    Ubuntu – my bittorrent client, filezilla, experimenting with terminal
    Vista – gaming, MS Office
    XP – …my parents use this since they’re too used to it. Pretty lightweight, stable, and capable of web browsing and document editing
    Windows 7 – playing around with it

    But obviously the top two OS’s are Leopard and Vista, since I use them for serious purposes (gaming is one >:D) Obviously, all OS’s are able to view documents, browse web, edit photos, the list goes on. Each OS has its pros and cons, but the master do-it-all OS I have to say is WIndows Vista SP1. Now that doesn’t mean it can “do-it-all” at the greatest quality or performance, but it can “do it all”, and THAT’s what I rely on.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Alerts

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of PCMECH readers to notify them of new posts. This email is just a short, plain email with titles and links to our latest posts. You can unsubscribe from this service at any time.

You can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Newsletter

Running for over 6 years, the PCMECH weekly newsletter helps you keep tabs on the world of tech. Each issue includes news bits, an article, an exclusive rant as well as a download of the week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 28,000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other option) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: