<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 Is Windows 7, Even If Not 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcmech.com/article/windows-7-is-windows-7-even-if-not-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/windows-7-is-windows-7-even-if-not-7/</link>
	<description>Helping Normal People Get Their Geek On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beyond &#187; Microsoft News from the PDC</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/windows-7-is-windows-7-even-if-not-7/comment-page-1/#comment-16113</link>
		<dc:creator>Beyond &#187; Microsoft News from the PDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/windows-7-is-windows-7-even-if-not-7/#comment-16113</guid>
		<description>[...] number to 6.1 rather than version 7 as a sign of its intention to ease the task of upgrading. (See this article on PCMech.com.) &quot;If it works on Windows Vista, it&#8217;ll work in Windows 7. The move from Vista to Windows [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] number to 6.1 rather than version 7 as a sign of its intention to ease the task of upgrading. (See this article on PCMech.com.) &quot;If it works on Windows Vista, it&#8217;ll work in Windows 7. The move from Vista to Windows [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lespaul20</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/windows-7-is-windows-7-even-if-not-7/comment-page-1/#comment-15872</link>
		<dc:creator>lespaul20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/windows-7-is-windows-7-even-if-not-7/#comment-15872</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think MS was using Kernel versions to name this. This will be seventh major desktop release from MS. This is a marketing name not a technical name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think MS was using Kernel versions to name this. This will be seventh major desktop release from MS. This is a marketing name not a technical name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Santos</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/windows-7-is-windows-7-even-if-not-7/comment-page-1/#comment-15766</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo Santos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/windows-7-is-windows-7-even-if-not-7/#comment-15766</guid>
		<description>i would bet with you that microsft will change the name of the next windows... lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would bet with you that microsft will change the name of the next windows&#8230; lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharron</title>
		<link>http://www.pcmech.com/article/windows-7-is-windows-7-even-if-not-7/comment-page-1/#comment-15748</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcmech.com/article/windows-7-is-windows-7-even-if-not-7/#comment-15748</guid>
		<description>Interesting. It ties in with my article on the subject of Windows 7 being called Windows 7 officially that I &lt;a href=&quot;http://kkomp.com/archives/2199&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blogged earlier today.&lt;/a&gt;

According to Mike Nash, the corporate VP of Windows management:

&quot;The decision to use the name Windows 7 is about simplicity...coming up with an all-new ‘aspirational’ name does not do justice to what we are trying to achieve...&quot;

...Which may just be an official way of saying 
&quot;We like a change from time to time&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. It ties in with my article on the subject of Windows 7 being called Windows 7 officially that I <a href="http://kkomp.com/archives/2199" rel="nofollow">blogged earlier today.</a></p>
<p>According to Mike Nash, the corporate VP of Windows management:</p>
<p>&#8220;The decision to use the name Windows 7 is about simplicity&#8230;coming up with an all-new ‘aspirational’ name does not do justice to what we are trying to achieve&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;Which may just be an official way of saying<br />
&#8220;We like a change from time to time&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
