PCMech Forums - View Single Post

DrZaius · 09-03-2001, 03:32 PM

Thanks Mike, just read the review. It does look promising and is helping VIA get over the buggy KT266 reputation, but it seems people have short memories. Like I said before, VIA has repetely released buggy chipsets only to fix them later with a new version and claim "new features!" Past VIA blunders:

Apollo 133 to 133A
KT133 to KT133A
686A to 686B
KT266 to KT266A

I'm waiting for the nForce which should give VIA's KT266A a run for it's money, but I don't plan on upgrading anytime soon, I'm happy with my SiS735.

09-03-2001, 03:32 PM	#4
DrZaius Member (13 bit) Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Fullerton, CA Posts: 7,030	Thanks Mike, just read the review. It does look promising and is helping VIA get over the buggy KT266 reputation, but it seems people have short memories. Like I said before, VIA has repetely released buggy chipsets only to fix them later with a new version and claim "new features!" Past VIA blunders: Apollo 133 to 133A KT133 to KT133A 686A to 686B KT266 to KT266A I'm waiting for the nForce which should give VIA's KT266A a run for it's money, but I don't plan on upgrading anytime soon, I'm happy with my SiS735. __________________ "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire