PCMech Forums - View Single Post

reboot · 12-27-2001, 11:38 AM

Yup, same chip. Cranked it to 133 the day I got it, ran the benchmarks/burnin over night, and took it to 150 the next day.
Been there ever since, and totally flawless, except for the "too much RAM in windows 98" issue, not the chip's fault.
The 600@900 (with the 150mhz FSB) outperforms the Athlon 1.4 at (supposedly) 266mhz FSB with the same amount of RAM, albeit different mobos (duh).

12-27-2001, 11:38 AM	#13
reboot Member (14 bit) Join Date: Mar 1999 Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada Posts: 9,138	Yup, same chip. Cranked it to 133 the day I got it, ran the benchmarks/burnin over night, and took it to 150 the next day. Been there ever since, and totally flawless, except for the "too much RAM in windows 98" issue, not the chip's fault. The 600@900 (with the 150mhz FSB) outperforms the Athlon 1.4 at (supposedly) 266mhz FSB with the same amount of RAM, albeit different mobos (duh). __________________ Black holes are where God divided by zero... Cheers, Jim Jims Modems