Quote:
Originally posted by Statica
Fred:
Thats where I find most MS users comparison bad. They're comparing 98 vs XP .. 2K vs XP is the real comparison to be made. and other than those sparse features of XP over 2K, there is no real reason that XP is better; but tons of security reasons why 2K is better.
Most people who are in praise of XP are 9x users who have their first taste of an NT kernel and NTFS, over the nonsense that 9x and FAT32 represent, to them they are going to be wowed by the stability.
|
Hey Statica, do you know of any good websites/resources comparing the security of 2K to XP? I primarily use 2K; I only have one XP machine under my juristiction at work, and I haven't had a whole lot of chances to play around with it. I'm interested in knowing the specifics of what is different in XP.
__________________
Paul M. Victorey
------------------
I am not responsible for any problems that may arise as a result of following my advice. This includes, but is not limited to, computer failure, loss of data, nuclear war, famine, boils, no clean laundry, your daughter running off with a biker gang, or armageddon. Take my advice at your own risk.
|