[LawyerRon]

clydefo,
Your initial post declared there was “massive fraud”. Do you know the “elements” of a fraud case? What’s the burden of proof in a fraud case? Fraud is a crime requiring the “trier of fact” to reach a conclusion of law based on the finding of certain facts. The facts I’ve seen do not suggest all elements of fraud are met. But all the facts are not known. You and I are not the “triers of fact” here. So your inexcusable bias is leading you to a “conclusion” before all facts are known. The only other person I’ve seen take this approach so far is Jesse Jackson.

I personally don’t care which party wins this election. Further, I refuse to argue legal issues like fraud in this forum with non-lawyers because every lawyer knows that “a non-lawyer's legal opinion, like a stopped clock, can only be correct by coincidence”.