|
But this is still your opinion, right? Not that there is anything wrong with that, but I still have not seen anything that compels me to say one is better than the other. If the "+" format's only claim to fame is that it is multisession with the ability to write part of a video, come back and write another part, well I don't think that means much to the general consumer.
And there is an entire industry that uses and will continue to use the "-" format. Every content creator I've worked with in studios and production houses from Chicago to Grand Rapids and Lansing to Detroit (and elsewhere) all use the "-" format. I was just talking the other day to a associate at C2 Media up in Grand Rapids and he was telling me about the horrors of the "+" format from their perspective. They had delievered a DVD+ to Chysler for a video montage of the Liberty to be shown at the autoshow in Detroit. The DVD+ wouldn't play on any DVD player Chrysler brought in. C2 was in quite a bind with that (a production intern had incorrectly used the "+" format rather than the "-" format. So I'm not at all convinced one is better than the other.
|