PCMech Forums - View Single Post

Paul Victorey · 03-23-2003, 07:04 PM

Actually, none of the inspections found any trace of biochem weapons, so there's no PROOF he has biochem weapons. We know he does NOT yet have nuclear weapons, and in fact, our evidence that he was trying to get them turned out to be forged documents, so there's no real evidence Saddam has any kind f nuclear program.

All the evidence for Iraq's nuclear capabilities were forged documents, and one Iraqi expatriate who claimed to be a nuclear engineer (he was actually a software programmer), and who testified before congress that Iraq was months away from having nuclear capabilities despite the fact he hasn't been in Iraq for 10 years.

So if Baghdad is nuked, it would have to be by us. If, however, Saddam still does have biochem weapons that weren't destroyed, those could be a threat to us.

03-23-2003, 07:04 PM	#21
Paul Victorey Member (12 bit) Join Date: Mar 1999 Location: MN or WI Posts: 3,017	Actually, none of the inspections found any trace of biochem weapons, so there's no PROOF he has biochem weapons. We know he does NOT yet have nuclear weapons, and in fact, our evidence that he was trying to get them turned out to be forged documents, so there's no real evidence Saddam has any kind f nuclear program. All the evidence for Iraq's nuclear capabilities were forged documents, and one Iraqi expatriate who claimed to be a nuclear engineer (he was actually a software programmer), and who testified before congress that Iraq was months away from having nuclear capabilities despite the fact he hasn't been in Iraq for 10 years. So if Baghdad is nuked, it would have to be by us. If, however, Saddam still does have biochem weapons that weren't destroyed, those could be a threat to us.