Quote:
Originally posted by Colonel Sanders
I thinks it's abesolutley stupid. For an employer, it makes sense, but to keep track of your kids? No.
If your that worried about them doing something bad in there car/your car, don't let them drive. I know people who don't drive because they got in trouble driving. Everyone deserves some privacy, and by the time your old enough to drive, you should have some privacy. Maybe if you let a 14 year old drive(yes, around here I was even driving at that age)...  Even if a 14 year old here gets a license, they may only legally drive out in the country...
If you cant trust your kid, don't let them do it.
Next will be seeing GPS trackers standard in cars so cops can know exactly when you were speeding, how would you like that?
L J
|
As a parent it is your responsibility to keep your kid as safe as possible, this is a tool to help a parent do that. You may never know that your kid is an unsafe driver until it is too late, this may give you some insight to their behind the wheel behavior and allow you to take steps to correct that behavior.
Yes, children need some privacy but the need for privacy stops at the door that leads to things that can kill or serious hurt them.
trust is something that is earned not automatically given.
Quote:
Originally posted by Lespaul20
I would rather see a driver with 5 years experience going 100+ than a 16 yr old. My 2cents.
|
actually i would not. imagine you're travling at the speed limit of 65mph, at a 100mph, closing speed is 35mph and dodging in and out of traffic (to have a clear path) makes you a deadly weapon. if the faster speed car just touches another car, the driver will more than likely lose complete control of his vehicle and the struck car will also more than likely lose it as well (look at nascar sometime, these guys have closing speeds of less than 5 mph and look at the wrecks they get into due to slight impacts...are you suggesting that the average driver with 5 years of experience can deal with what the pros can't?)