View Single Post
Old 09-09-2004, 02:53 AM   #9
RJ
Member (14 bit)
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Offenbach/Main (Germany)
Posts: 8,485
Send a message via ICQ to RJ
Quote:
19" LCD's with a max resolution of 1280x1024 seem to have a .294 dot pitch, even when they're high end, while the 17" will have a .264. Is the higher dot pitch going to be visible?
Yes it is. Both 17" and 19" display 1280x1024, but since the 19" is bigger, it displays 1280x1024 on a bigger area, hence gives you a bigger picture.

Quote:
What do you think about 25ms response times versus 12ms or 16ms response times? I don't do too much gaming, but occasionaly I break out unreal tournament.
The lower the better, but any of them is already good.

Quote:
Viewing angle: anyone who uses an LCD on a daily basis, do you ever find that viewing angle makes much of a difference? Most of the monitors I'm looking at have around 140/140 degree viewing, but some have up to 170/170. I'm not sure if I want to shell out the extra money for wider viewing.
It's a personal preference I guess. My TFT has 150/110, and while the 150 are good, I sometimes wish I had better vertical viewing angle. But it depends on your needs to look at the screen from the side. 140/140 looks ok to me.

Quote:
Brightness: 250 cd/m^2 seems pretty common. Does anybody prefer more?
No, it'd be too bright. About 250cd/mē is common and good. It's already more than twice as bright as a CRT. Also the brightness has an influence on the contrast ratio. A TFT with 250cd/mē and 450:1 contrast is good. A TFT with 370cd/mē and 450:1 has a lower contrast. . it's not the same. But when getting a TFT with 250cd/mē, 300:1 should be the minimum for contrast. The higher, the better.

Quote:
Connection: I've read some reviews and people say that with DVI the image quality is a bit better over the regular 15 pin D Sub cable. Does anyone have any experience with that?
DVI looks better, although the difference is only slightly. I personally wouldn't get a TFT without DVI, and I don't understand why the manufacturers don't include DVI in every TFT, as it's cheap to include. Anyway, the picture also looks good with VGA, so unless you are a real quality freak like me, you probably won't notice.
And I only noticed the difference after I switched to DVI. Before that, I had no comparison anyway.

Quote:
Samsung and Viewsonic seem to be pretty well thought of, so that's what I'm looking at right now. Does anyone recomend any other brands, or specific monitors?
Samsung ist good, but Viewsonic is bad for games. Also look at Philips, NEC, EIZO, they're also good brands.

RJ
__________________
All's right with the world when your PC is working right.
RJ is offline   Reply With Quote