PCMech Forums - View Single Post - 64 bit Intel Processor? Its true, supposedly

Avenger · 02-22-2005, 04:24 PM

Well, if you guys want another point of view, here are some more benchmarks:

Toms Crappy Hardware
Hot Hardware
Tech Report
FiringSquad
Anandtech

Intel will need more than upping their FSB and L2 caches to overtake the Athlon 64. The Athlon 64 is just a superior architecture than what Intel has currently (only personal thoughts).

That's why I wonder why some review sites don't include all the benchmarks (the only ones that did san extensive review were Techreport and Anandtech), maybe, they don't want to ashame Intel (well, they already are), that's why they only focus on audio/video ancoding and some synthetic benchmarks.

I just hope AMD release their E stepping with SSE3 and 2MB cache to embarass Intel a lot more (only personal thoughts).

02-22-2005, 04:24 PM	#12
Avenger Member (6 bit) Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 56	Well, if you guys want another point of view, here are some more benchmarks: Toms Crappy Hardware Hot Hardware Tech Report FiringSquad Anandtech Intel will need more than upping their FSB and L2 caches to overtake the Athlon 64. The Athlon 64 is just a superior architecture than what Intel has currently (only personal thoughts). That's why I wonder why some review sites don't include all the benchmarks (the only ones that did san extensive review were Techreport and Anandtech), maybe, they don't want to ashame Intel (well, they already are), that's why they only focus on audio/video ancoding and some synthetic benchmarks. I just hope AMD release their E stepping with SSE3 and 2MB cache to embarass Intel a lot more (only personal thoughts). Last edited by Avenger; 02-22-2005 at 04:28 PM.