PCMech Forums - View Single Post

Artaudd · 07-17-2001, 03:44 AM

i just found out some new info . i should be worried about the kapm-idled because its supposed to say that but its not really 'true'. Several months ago, kapmd was renamed to kapm-idled in an attempt to
> signal users that it was a special process, and that its CPU time wasn't
> "real CPU time." This hasn't silenced the bug reports and confusion.

But there are a 2-3 more processes that are right next to this one that say the same ting.

07-17-2001, 03:44 AM	#2
Artaudd Member (8 bit) Join Date: Apr 2000 Location: Fairfax, Virginia Posts: 173	new info i just found out some new info . i should be worried about the kapm-idled because its supposed to say that but its not really 'true'. Several months ago, kapmd was renamed to kapm-idled in an attempt to > signal users that it was a special process, and that its CPU time wasn't > "real CPU time." This hasn't silenced the bug reports and confusion. But there are a 2-3 more processes that are right next to this one that say the same ting.