Janet is at it again

[Strider]

I find it amazing that Janet is at it again : http://www.cnn.com/2005/SHOWBIZ/Music/10/28/people.janetjackson.ap/index.html

While I not trying to sound racist, but does Janet really have to sunbath nude? Maybe she's just a nudist? However, I think she's just doing this for the publicity because her career is taking a tumble and trying to create a public stir to get it back in the limelight. Although I think the whole Jackson family is a little strange.;)

[rjfvillarosa]

Just goes to show what a crock of **** cnn are, that video has been around for months.

Naked Janet Jackson video on Web

Friday, October 28, 2005 Posted: 1248 GMT (2048 HKT)
Obviously they don't have anything else more important to talk about.

[apollo]

Nothing racist about it Strider. Let me throw another "-ist" in the ring... "exhibitionist". That 'wardrobe malfunction' was the lamest (most lame?) publicity-stunt-but-not-a-publicity-stunt I've ever seen. If it was so unexpected, why was she wearing that strategically-placed bosom jewelery? (I admit it... I took a second look but it was purely for science.) I suppose it's possible she walks around with that stuff on all the time, but that brings us back to your oberservation of the Jackson's being weird, doesn't it.

Sex sells rjf - although I'm sure we all would've liked to think that CNN was above the rabble in that regard. I guess the only objective news outlet we have left is Fox News :p

[catacon]

I think people should be left alone. If she wants to sun-bathe nude, that's fine. As long as she stays out of my yard, I'm OK with it.

[blue60007]

Heh, like I really care if she was sun bathing nude, or if she picked her nose.

I agree with apollo, why would you have a wardrobe with strategically placed removalable parts? I have a feeling that was planned. Oh and why did he go grabbing over there? I could see maybe if he tripped or something and swatted over there but really?

[Force Flow]

I think the real problem is peoples' fascination with celebrities. They're not really as cracked up as they are made out to be.

[apollo]

I think the real problem is peoples' fascination with celebrities. They're not really as cracked up as they are made out to be.
Amen to that FF. I suppose the only reason this stuff gets reported is because 'we' lap it up (not us though :) ).

I think people should be left alone. If she wants to sun-bathe nude, that's fine. As long as she stays out of my yard, I'm OK with it.
Well said catacon. We're so used to being fed information about celebrities' private lives that we sometimes forget that's exactly what they are - private. I feel justified in my rant against the superbowl wardrobe malfunction, but what she (or any other celebrity) does 'in private' should not be anyone's business but her own. I know how I'd feel if I was in a similar situation (not the nude sunbathing, though... that would just be nasty :eek: )

[David M]

With her brothers carreer in the toilet she is probably pretty worried. I think most Hollywood carreers depend on publicity to keep them in the limelight and in the minds of people who hire them. It seems the problem is that most Hollywood celebrities cannot discern the difference between positive publicity and negative publicity.

Its an oxymoron to be considered a celebrity and to have no press coverage. She is just trying to get back in the limelight. Personally, I have no attraction to her whatsoever.

[blue60007]

I think the real problem is peoples' fascination with celebrities. They're not really as cracked up as they are made out to be.

Yep, half the time they are ding-dongs and ditzes. No one cares about the average working person that actually does a job to make a living.

[kosova]

doesnt this pic of her look bad or is it just me http://www.cnn.com/2005/SHOWBIZ/Music/10/28/people.janetjackson.ap/index.html

as for the whole super bowel and nudity of sunbathing watever. DOnt care!! let her do what she wants, if she's willing to humilate herself to get attention then watever.

[MakeYourslf2012]

I think people should be left alone. If she wants to sun-bathe nude, that's fine. As long as she stays out of my yard, I'm OK with it.


I wouldn't mind if Janet Jackson sun bathed in my yard. lol

[Colonel Sanders]

The link does say that it was an unwanted paparazi video and not anything that Janet might have intentionally or "accidentally" leaked to attempt to get publicity. I don't believe what she did was to try to get publicity.

While I not trying to sound racist, but does Janet really have to sunbath nude? Are you trying to suggest that because her skin is naturally dark that she does not need to tan? I have no idea if people with an ethnicity similar to hers or haveing dark skin would need to tan or not. If your skin tone is naturally dark, I don't think it would make much sense to tan.

I hope that last paragraph doesn't sound racsist.

L J

[Doobie]

The video was funny… who in there right mind spanks themselves while they sunbath but what do I expect from a Jackson. :eek:

[Statica]

Moderator note: Ok before we go on and on about semi-, quasi-, implied- or whatever rascist comments, please be aware that this board is frequented by a great many groups of people. We dont need to get involved in discussions of any nature that may be construed as that...
Please note that the original subject in the URL is for sun<b>bathing</b> not for sun<b>tanning</b>; big difference! sunbathing is a leisure activity that is not limited by any one skin color.
Also note that prepending your comment with "Not to sound <insert_what_you_are_about_to_do>" does not make it right for these boards. If you feel that your comment may be construed as it .. then leave it be...

[apollo]

Point taken Statica.

This is how I interpreted the initial statement:
"Does she really need to sunbath nude?"

But I see it's gone more in this direction:
"Does she really need to sunbath nude?"

...which, as you point out, is not appropriate (no offense to any of the posters :) ). It was not my intention to contribute to that line of thought and I apologize if I did so inadvertently.

[doctorgonzo]

I just want to know why I should care one bit what she or anybody else not within visual distance of me does with his/her free time.

[Colonel Sanders]

Moderator note: Ok before we go on and on about semi-, quasi-, implied- or whatever rascist comments, please be aware that this board is frequented by a great many groups of people. We dont need to get involved in discussions of any nature that may be construed as that...
Please note that the original subject in the URL is for sun<b>bathing</b> not for sun<b>tanning</b>; big difference! sunbathing is a leisure activity that is not limited by any one skin color.
Also note that prepending your comment with "Not to sound <insert_what_you_are_about_to_do>" does not make it right for these boards. If you feel that your comment may be construed as it .. then leave it be...

I'll agree with you Statica, I mis interpreted the original posters question. I don't want to start any sort of racial arguments, I do think my question is valid to an extent. If the moderators feel that it should be edited and removed I would have no objection to that.

L J