LoC
12-23-2005, 10:38 PM
ok so i have overclocked my system to the specifications below. using 3DMark03 my test results do not seem to reflect the power of my system. for instance, one comparison shows at 3200+ Venice core nearly beating my 3700+ San Diego core. how can this be? espiecally is his FSB is 29MHz lower than mine?
Comparison system:
3200+ Venice 0518 APDW 10x240HTT - 2xeVGA 6800U PCI-E SLI @425/1100 - 2x256MB KHX3200K2/512 BH-5 @240mhz 2-2-2-6 7-14-2222 3120 16x 7x - NF4 6.53 remix chipset driver, 76.10 310 OFFICIAL
General Information (both):
Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP
DirectX Version 9.0c
(me)ASUSTeK Computer INC. A8N-SLI DELUXE
(comparison) DFI Corp,LTD LP NF4 Series
CPU:
(me)AMD Athlon(tm) 64 2531MHz | (comparison)AMD Athlon(tm) 64 2400MHz
FSB:
(me) 230 MHz | (comparison) 201 MHz
Memory:
(me) 2048 MB | (comparison) 512 MB
CPU Score:
(me) 1164 | (comparison) 1127
as well, though the comparison uses dual 6800GTs as opposed to my single, the "Wings of Fury" test are only 10FPS apart while the rest are nearly double my performance. i can not figure why the first test has such similar results and the rest show his SLI setup.
others with lesser systems seem to be able to match my capabilities and greatly surpass my system. this REALLY gets me angry that i spent money on what seemed to be a great system yet is destroyed by everyone else in benchmarks.
Comparison system:
3200+ Venice 0518 APDW 10x240HTT - 2xeVGA 6800U PCI-E SLI @425/1100 - 2x256MB KHX3200K2/512 BH-5 @240mhz 2-2-2-6 7-14-2222 3120 16x 7x - NF4 6.53 remix chipset driver, 76.10 310 OFFICIAL
General Information (both):
Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP
DirectX Version 9.0c
(me)ASUSTeK Computer INC. A8N-SLI DELUXE
(comparison) DFI Corp,LTD LP NF4 Series
CPU:
(me)AMD Athlon(tm) 64 2531MHz | (comparison)AMD Athlon(tm) 64 2400MHz
FSB:
(me) 230 MHz | (comparison) 201 MHz
Memory:
(me) 2048 MB | (comparison) 512 MB
CPU Score:
(me) 1164 | (comparison) 1127
as well, though the comparison uses dual 6800GTs as opposed to my single, the "Wings of Fury" test are only 10FPS apart while the rest are nearly double my performance. i can not figure why the first test has such similar results and the rest show his SLI setup.
others with lesser systems seem to be able to match my capabilities and greatly surpass my system. this REALLY gets me angry that i spent money on what seemed to be a great system yet is destroyed by everyone else in benchmarks.